National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Scope of Work for Project A-27." TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
12
bottomleft bottomright
Page
12
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Research Objective (1-1)
Report Output (2-2)
Business Case (3-4)
Train Control Technology (5-5)
Grade Crossing Hazards (6-6)
Requirements for Concurrent Shared-Track Operations (7-7)
Practical Shortcuts (8-8)
Advancing the Shared-Track Concept (9-9)
Introduction (10-10)
Reader's Guide to the Final Report (11-11)
Scope of Work for Project A-27 (12-12)
Research Approach (13-13)
Characteristics of a Shared-Track Corridor (14-14)
Freight Operations Perspective (15-16)
Why Share Track? (17-17)
The Business Model (18-18)
Business Model Structure (19-19)
The Business Case (20-20)
Shared-Track - A Practical Business Case Structure (21-22)
Role of the Designated State Safety Organization (23-23)
Methods for Risk Analyses (24-24)
Equal Risks, Equivalent Safety (25-25)
Underpinning the Case for Shared-Track (26-26)
The Role of Command and Control Systems in Shared-Track (27-27)
1) Train Control System Functions (28-28)
2) Train Control System Design Parameters (29-29)
4) Train Control - Emerging Technology - PTC and CBTC (30-30)
System and Integration Testing - Vendor Role (31-31)
8) Issues Unique to Train Control for Shared-Track (32-32)
Auxiliary Safety Critical Systems (33-33)
9) Fail-Safe Train Separation (34-35)
2) Regulatory and Practical Requirements (36-37)
4) Functional Design of a Communications System (38-38)
2) Regulatory Mandates (39-39)
4) The Rulebook (40-40)
5) Rules and Procedures for Shared-Track (41-41)
Background (42-42)
2) Diesel Multiple Units and Electrical Multiple Units (43-43)
2) Crash Energy Management (CEM) (44-44)
3) Propulsion System (45-45)
5) Other Considerations (46-46)
Vehicles for Shared-Track Applications (47-47)
3) Standardization (48-48)
Applying Technology to Shared-Track Operations - A Brief Guide (49-50)
Shared-Track Operations - The North American Experience (51-51)
2) Former Private Freight Railroad Owner Becomes a Privileged Tenant (52-52)
4) Pressure to Commingle Is Heaviest on Lines with Higher Freight Densities* - A Review of Different Solutions (53-53)
6) Transit Operators Choosing to Avoid Commingling Sacrificed Service Quality and Efficiency (54-54)
Business Case Template (55-55)
Alternatives Analysis (56-56)
Reasons to Consider Noncompliant Equipment (57-57)
Service Characteristics to Justify the Choice of a Light Rail System (58-58)
Structures Considerations (59-59)
Cost and Ridership Analyses (60-60)
Cost Analysis for Signal System Alternatives (61-62)
System Capital Cost Assessment (63-63)
System Operating Cost Assessment (64-65)
Alternatives Evaluation (66-66)
Introduction (67-67)
Risk Analysis and Modeling Methodology (68-70)
Results and Risk Analysis Findings (71-72)
Safety Case Findings (73-73)
San Diego Trolley (74-74)
Achievable Incremental Steps (75-75)
Practical Shortcuts For Shared-Track (76-76)
Demonstration Project (77-77)
Application of Risk Analyses Methodology to the Demonstration Project (78-78)
Data Collection Plan (79-79)
San Diego Trolley, Inc. (80-80)
Barriers to Implementation (81-81)
Shared Track - The Potential Market (82-82)
Shared-Track Operation - An Evolving Concept (83-84)
Bibliography (85-86)
Appendix 1 - Abbreviations (87-87)
Appendix 2 - Glossary of Shared-Track Definitions (88-92)
Appendix 3 - TCRP A-27 Research Task Descriptions (93-97)
Appendix 4 - Relative Cost Comparison of Train Control Systems (98-99)
Appendix 5 - Sample Operating Rulebook Table of Contents (100-100)
Appendix 6 - Vehicle Cost Drivers (101-101)
Appendix 7 - Some Examples of Current Production LRV and MU Vehicle Types (102-105)
Appendix 8 - Shared-Track System Status (106-106)
Appendix 9 - Shared-Track Configuration and Operational Alternatives (107-109)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (110-110)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 12
12 Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide Chapter 2--Shared-Track: Laying the Foundation--Policy and Strategy Policy and strategy. This section explains the policy and strategic underpinnings of a shared-track operation. It discusses the broader institutional aspects including the busi- ness model, the outline of a business case and the safety case. It reviews the FRA Waiver process, the role of State Safety Oversight, and the contribution of Risk Analysis to the safety case. Chapter 3--Enabling Shared-Track: Technology, Command, and Control Technical elements. This is a straightforward summary of train control technology, commu- nications, Rules and Procedures and current and new vehicle designs, and how each con- tributes to a viable shared-track operation. It notes the influence of each on safety and the practical application and integration with both the passenger and freight operation. The influ- ence of technology on the safety case is described. Chapter 4--Shared-Track: A Handbook of Examples and Applications Practitioner's guide to shared-track. This section serves as the practical manual. It is an account of North American shared-track operations and progress to date. A business case template illustrating the use and interpretation of business case data (sample worksheets are included) follows next. The guide contains a risk analysis template and an explanation of how the results impact the business case and ultimately project viability. Incremental steps to move beyond "rigid temporal separation" are reported as evidence of evolutionary progress in shared-track operations. Finally, concrete guidelines are suggested to help project planners develop a shared-track operation with a freight railroad. Chapter 5--Shared Use: Progress and Evolution Future directions for the shared-track service concept. What realistic approaches can be employed to increase the interest and potential of shared-track systems? Candidates and appropriate conditions are recommended for a demonstration project. The advantages and disadvantages, and their effect on the potential market are reviewed. This segment points out barriers and impediments to broader application and acceptance of this mode of operations. Finally it suggests area or research and efforts likely to enhance the practical appeal of this operational concept. Bibliography Appendices 1) Abbreviations 2) Glossary 3) TCRP A-27 Research Task Descriptions 4) Relative Cost Comparison of Train Control Systems 5) Sample Operating Rulebook Table of Contents 6) Vehicle Cost Drivers 7) Some Examples of Current Vehicle Production LRV and MU Vehicle Types 8) Shared-Track System Status 9) Shared-Track Configuration and Operational Alternatives Research Effort Scope of Work for Project A-27 TCRP issued its Research Project Statement for Project A-27, "Shared Use of Railroad Infra- structure with Non-FRA-Compliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles" on March 29, 2005. Thirteen tasks broken into two phases (summarized previously and shown in the Appendix) constituted the scope of work and defined the research effort. The principal aim of the investigation, reiter- ated here, is taken from the Project Statement.