National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Report Output." TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
2
bottomleft bottomright
Page
2
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Research Objective (1-1)
Report Output (2-2)
Business Case (3-4)
Train Control Technology (5-5)
Grade Crossing Hazards (6-6)
Requirements for Concurrent Shared-Track Operations (7-7)
Practical Shortcuts (8-8)
Advancing the Shared-Track Concept (9-9)
Introduction (10-10)
Reader's Guide to the Final Report (11-11)
Scope of Work for Project A-27 (12-12)
Research Approach (13-13)
Characteristics of a Shared-Track Corridor (14-14)
Freight Operations Perspective (15-16)
Why Share Track? (17-17)
The Business Model (18-18)
Business Model Structure (19-19)
The Business Case (20-20)
Shared-Track - A Practical Business Case Structure (21-22)
Role of the Designated State Safety Organization (23-23)
Methods for Risk Analyses (24-24)
Equal Risks, Equivalent Safety (25-25)
Underpinning the Case for Shared-Track (26-26)
The Role of Command and Control Systems in Shared-Track (27-27)
1) Train Control System Functions (28-28)
2) Train Control System Design Parameters (29-29)
4) Train Control - Emerging Technology - PTC and CBTC (30-30)
System and Integration Testing - Vendor Role (31-31)
8) Issues Unique to Train Control for Shared-Track (32-32)
Auxiliary Safety Critical Systems (33-33)
9) Fail-Safe Train Separation (34-35)
2) Regulatory and Practical Requirements (36-37)
4) Functional Design of a Communications System (38-38)
2) Regulatory Mandates (39-39)
4) The Rulebook (40-40)
5) Rules and Procedures for Shared-Track (41-41)
Background (42-42)
2) Diesel Multiple Units and Electrical Multiple Units (43-43)
2) Crash Energy Management (CEM) (44-44)
3) Propulsion System (45-45)
5) Other Considerations (46-46)
Vehicles for Shared-Track Applications (47-47)
3) Standardization (48-48)
Applying Technology to Shared-Track Operations - A Brief Guide (49-50)
Shared-Track Operations - The North American Experience (51-51)
2) Former Private Freight Railroad Owner Becomes a Privileged Tenant (52-52)
4) Pressure to Commingle Is Heaviest on Lines with Higher Freight Densities* - A Review of Different Solutions (53-53)
6) Transit Operators Choosing to Avoid Commingling Sacrificed Service Quality and Efficiency (54-54)
Business Case Template (55-55)
Alternatives Analysis (56-56)
Reasons to Consider Noncompliant Equipment (57-57)
Service Characteristics to Justify the Choice of a Light Rail System (58-58)
Structures Considerations (59-59)
Cost and Ridership Analyses (60-60)
Cost Analysis for Signal System Alternatives (61-62)
System Capital Cost Assessment (63-63)
System Operating Cost Assessment (64-65)
Alternatives Evaluation (66-66)
Introduction (67-67)
Risk Analysis and Modeling Methodology (68-70)
Results and Risk Analysis Findings (71-72)
Safety Case Findings (73-73)
San Diego Trolley (74-74)
Achievable Incremental Steps (75-75)
Practical Shortcuts For Shared-Track (76-76)
Demonstration Project (77-77)
Application of Risk Analyses Methodology to the Demonstration Project (78-78)
Data Collection Plan (79-79)
San Diego Trolley, Inc. (80-80)
Barriers to Implementation (81-81)
Shared Track - The Potential Market (82-82)
Shared-Track Operation - An Evolving Concept (83-84)
Bibliography (85-86)
Appendix 1 - Abbreviations (87-87)
Appendix 2 - Glossary of Shared-Track Definitions (88-92)
Appendix 3 - TCRP A-27 Research Task Descriptions (93-97)
Appendix 4 - Relative Cost Comparison of Train Control Systems (98-99)
Appendix 5 - Sample Operating Rulebook Table of Contents (100-100)
Appendix 6 - Vehicle Cost Drivers (101-101)
Appendix 7 - Some Examples of Current Production LRV and MU Vehicle Types (102-105)
Appendix 8 - Shared-Track System Status (106-106)
Appendix 9 - Shared-Track Configuration and Operational Alternatives (107-109)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (110-110)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 2
2 Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide Summary of Research Tasks The research program was divided into a series of tasks. The results of these task efforts were assembled and condensed for this final report. Phase I Tasks 1­5 describe current and state-of-the-art technology and vehicles, and inventory the status of shared-track projects in North America. This narrative forms the context for the anticipated guidelines to commence a shared-track operation. A requisite preliminary was a literature review, data collection, and analysis. Identification of relevant information helped to focus on the most critical issues, avoided duplication of previous efforts, built on that prior work, and ensured access to the most current knowledge and thinking. The Task 6 Report summarizes the results from Tasks 1­5. (1) Command and control (C&C) systems are a cornerstone of FRA approved safety procedures used on freight railroads to avoid collisions, and their principles are sig- nificant to development of any shared-track operations involving noncompliant rail transit vehicles. Techniques and technologies of the three major branches of C&C-- train control, communications and Rules and Procedures--underscore the goals of redundancy and other measures to ensure a fail-safe environment. (2) Information on current and new classes of railcar equipment was assembled and sup- plemented with descriptions of special attributes, such as crashworthiness and enhanced braking capabilities, needed in shared-track. Emphasis is on those features that will compensate for vehicle structural deficiencies. Such features will be part of any success- ful Waiver Petition and a small wedge towards gaining FRA acceptance for "equivalent safety" decisions. (3) North American shared-track operations and programs have been identified and inven- toried to provide a reference resource. The findings, exposition, and analysis contained in the earlier tasks make a coherent case for Phase II, development of analysis tools and products to further future shared- track operations. Phase II Tasks 7­12 examine characteristics of freight railroads, financ- ing, and parameters and metrics for a business model, a business case template, a risk analysis template and a demonstration project recommendation. Task 13 encompasses the findings and analyses of Tasks 1­5 and 7­12 to prepare a comprehensive final report and guidebook for the practitioner. Report Output The report contains examples of North American shared-track operations and describes progress to date. A business case template illustrating the use and interpretation of busi- ness case data, including sample worksheets, is included, as is a risk analysis template and an explanation of how the results impact the business case and ultimately project viabil- ity. Incremental steps to move beyond "rigid temporal separation" are reported as evi- dence of evolutionary progress in shared-track operations. Finally, concrete actions are proposed to help project planners develop a shared-track operation with a freight railroad. Ultimately the research suggests ways to increase the interest and potential of shared-track systems: · A list of possible candidates and preferred conditions for a demonstration project; · Highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of shared-track to broaden its service and practical economic appeal; and · Reflection on the barriers and obstacles to adoption of the shared-track concept.