Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 26


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 25
Shared-Track: Laying the Foundation--Policy and Strategy 25 Achieving Safety Equivalence Equivalent safety is not expressly defined in 49 CFR 211, the legal basis for wavier petitions and approved deviations from the Code of Federal Regulations (see Task 9, subsection "The Waiver Process"). Federal law requires: . . . the petition should explain how a level of safety at least equal to that afforded by the FRA rule will be provided by the alternative measures the petitioner proposes . . . requires a quantitative risk analysis of the risk of collision . . . (49 CFR 211, Appendix A, Section II, Part 2, Paragraph C). In other parts of 49 CFR 211, the concept of equivalent safety is often cited. The lack of explicit definition leaves this familiar and oft-quoted term open to interpretation both by regulators and petitioners. The prospective operator should endeavor to satisfy federal regulators on a practi- cal level by addressing several concerns as part of its waiver petition. How is equivalent safety measured or evaluated in this project? What is the appropriate and acceptable method for comparing the safety of a fully compliant operation to the proposed shared-track project? Is the validity of the comparison limited or qualified in any way? Comparing measures of safety equivalence with standards for other modes of transportation merits incorporation in any analysis. This multi-modal risk analysis should consider the null alternative (doing nothing), increased auto use, travel by bus, etc., that might result if a shared- track system is not built. Such an approach has been used for proposed Mag-Lev systems and air travel to determine overall risk, rather than mode specific risk. Equal Risks, Equivalent Safety Equivalent safety is best understood in terms of equal risks. Risk levels assumed for a federally compliant system must remain unchanged for any operating alternatives proposed for the project. Risk is defined as likelihood multiplied by consequence. Likelihood is the probability of a haz- ardous condition arising. Consequence is the severity of the hazard. Likelihood itself is a com- plex product of probability of a train encountering a hazardous event, number of trains and train miles operated in a given time, and number of passengers on each train. Together likelihood and consequence measure the total exposure of life and property to potential hazards. Table 4 pro- vides a simple illustration of the three major constituents of total risk assessment. Table 4. Illustration of three parts of total risk. Likelihood Probability Period Consequences Definition Chance of a hazard event Units of transportation The average amount affecting each unit of services operated in a of damage done given transportation service. given time period. that a hazard event occurs. Aviation Chance of a plane crash on Number of flights Average number of Example a given flight. operated per day. lives lost given a plane crash. Shared-Track Chance of an intrusion Number of light rail Average loss of life Example accident affecting a light vehicle trips operated per and property given rail vehicle and a freight day; number of freight that an intrusion event train. trains operated per day. occurs. Source of History of hazard events Operating plan and Accident history Data provides a probability per ridership projection provides unit of service. defines the units of quantification of Assumptions are made transportation services to severity of each type where there is insufficient be provided each day. of accident. data.