National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "5) Rules and Procedures for Shared-Track." TCRP Report 130: Shared Use of Railroad Infrastructure with Noncompliant Public Transit Rail Vehicles: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
41
bottomleft bottomright
Page
41
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Research Objective (1-1)
Report Output (2-2)
Business Case (3-4)
Train Control Technology (5-5)
Grade Crossing Hazards (6-6)
Requirements for Concurrent Shared-Track Operations (7-7)
Practical Shortcuts (8-8)
Advancing the Shared-Track Concept (9-9)
Introduction (10-10)
Reader's Guide to the Final Report (11-11)
Scope of Work for Project A-27 (12-12)
Research Approach (13-13)
Characteristics of a Shared-Track Corridor (14-14)
Freight Operations Perspective (15-16)
Why Share Track? (17-17)
The Business Model (18-18)
Business Model Structure (19-19)
The Business Case (20-20)
Shared-Track - A Practical Business Case Structure (21-22)
Role of the Designated State Safety Organization (23-23)
Methods for Risk Analyses (24-24)
Equal Risks, Equivalent Safety (25-25)
Underpinning the Case for Shared-Track (26-26)
The Role of Command and Control Systems in Shared-Track (27-27)
1) Train Control System Functions (28-28)
2) Train Control System Design Parameters (29-29)
4) Train Control - Emerging Technology - PTC and CBTC (30-30)
System and Integration Testing - Vendor Role (31-31)
8) Issues Unique to Train Control for Shared-Track (32-32)
Auxiliary Safety Critical Systems (33-33)
9) Fail-Safe Train Separation (34-35)
2) Regulatory and Practical Requirements (36-37)
4) Functional Design of a Communications System (38-38)
2) Regulatory Mandates (39-39)
4) The Rulebook (40-40)
5) Rules and Procedures for Shared-Track (41-41)
Background (42-42)
2) Diesel Multiple Units and Electrical Multiple Units (43-43)
2) Crash Energy Management (CEM) (44-44)
3) Propulsion System (45-45)
5) Other Considerations (46-46)
Vehicles for Shared-Track Applications (47-47)
3) Standardization (48-48)
Applying Technology to Shared-Track Operations - A Brief Guide (49-50)
Shared-Track Operations - The North American Experience (51-51)
2) Former Private Freight Railroad Owner Becomes a Privileged Tenant (52-52)
4) Pressure to Commingle Is Heaviest on Lines with Higher Freight Densities* - A Review of Different Solutions (53-53)
6) Transit Operators Choosing to Avoid Commingling Sacrificed Service Quality and Efficiency (54-54)
Business Case Template (55-55)
Alternatives Analysis (56-56)
Reasons to Consider Noncompliant Equipment (57-57)
Service Characteristics to Justify the Choice of a Light Rail System (58-58)
Structures Considerations (59-59)
Cost and Ridership Analyses (60-60)
Cost Analysis for Signal System Alternatives (61-62)
System Capital Cost Assessment (63-63)
System Operating Cost Assessment (64-65)
Alternatives Evaluation (66-66)
Introduction (67-67)
Risk Analysis and Modeling Methodology (68-70)
Results and Risk Analysis Findings (71-72)
Safety Case Findings (73-73)
San Diego Trolley (74-74)
Achievable Incremental Steps (75-75)
Practical Shortcuts For Shared-Track (76-76)
Demonstration Project (77-77)
Application of Risk Analyses Methodology to the Demonstration Project (78-78)
Data Collection Plan (79-79)
San Diego Trolley, Inc. (80-80)
Barriers to Implementation (81-81)
Shared Track - The Potential Market (82-82)
Shared-Track Operation - An Evolving Concept (83-84)
Bibliography (85-86)
Appendix 1 - Abbreviations (87-87)
Appendix 2 - Glossary of Shared-Track Definitions (88-92)
Appendix 3 - TCRP A-27 Research Task Descriptions (93-97)
Appendix 4 - Relative Cost Comparison of Train Control Systems (98-99)
Appendix 5 - Sample Operating Rulebook Table of Contents (100-100)
Appendix 6 - Vehicle Cost Drivers (101-101)
Appendix 7 - Some Examples of Current Production LRV and MU Vehicle Types (102-105)
Appendix 8 - Shared-Track System Status (106-106)
Appendix 9 - Shared-Track Configuration and Operational Alternatives (107-109)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (110-110)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 41
Enabling Shared-Track: Technology, Command, and Control 41 · Proficiency testing, fitness for duty and fatigue management practices; · Supplemental and revised documents to reflect system or operational changes; · Physical characteristics map and guide of the route for each employee; · Communications protocols for all employees of the passenger and freight system. A reliable communications system that links the control center to light passenger rail cars, freight equipment, MOW crews and work equipment, MOE crews and supervisors, and monitors/ commands the train control system. · Guidelines and instructions for incident and accident response and management While each system's rulebook may be organized differently, they all cover similar themes in a way appropriate to their system and culture. It is important that the freight operator be involved in the process of drafting the rulebook. While not all topics will be of concern to the freight carrier (e.g., light rail transit street running), there must be concurrence on topics of mutual interest. 5) Rules and Procedures for Shared-Track Operating R&P defines how the signal system directs train movements and interactions between traincrews, the control center, and trains. Rules describe signal aspects, their meaning, and standard procedures both in normal operation, and when failure occurs. This is a key aspect of train control and must complement the characteristics of the operation and technology. Shared-track operation complicates the development of rules because operating procedures for freight trains will necessarily differ from those for light passenger rail cars. Designers of a shared- track operation should address some or all of the issues bulleted below. · A prospective operator for shared-track operations should be cognizant of the mandates of FRA/FTA policy and regulations. · The agency operator must blend cultures and practices developed to serve freight movements, passenger operations, and a street running light rail transit (LRT) operation. · Implement joint training and testing programs, common rulebooks, user based special instructions and procedures, and physical characteristics training, including periodic revisions and currency updates. Institute proficiency testing. · Delineate ownership and responsibilities of each entity using the corridor, creating a need for communication between the parties at both a senior management level and the front line level for day-to-day operations. · Understand that Command and Control practices that may be necessary or appropriate for a passenger operation may not be valued, or may be perceived as impediments to their opera- tions, by the freight carrier. · Establish a control center that can set signals and switches, monitor and authorize train move- ments, and is capable of two way communications with train crews of both the passenger and freight equipment, and all MOW and MOE crews who access the shared ROW. · Confirm the transfer of operational authority for a former active freight line to a new passenger operating authority, along with the assumption of responsibility for Command and Control of both freight and passenger traffic. Transportation staff responsible for drafting rules and procedures should recognize that: 1. Since each shared-track operation and its associated communications network will be unique, the approach to Command and Control will have to be specifically tailored for the system. Commencement of any proposed shared-track operation will generate the need for new rules augmented and integrated with appropriate technology. A good foundation for new rules is the freight operators Book of Rules. 2. Shared-track creates the possibility for multiple operating environments within the same cor- ridor, including mainline railroad running, street running, mixing with automotive traffic,