Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 71
Shared-Track: A Handbook of Examples and Applications 71
Table 19. Summary of basic route
and service parameters.
Parameter Units Value
Days of Operation Days 250
Shared Route Length Miles 8.3
Number of Grade Crossings Number 8
Grade Crossings per Mile Number 0.96
Peak Service Interval Minutes 15
Off-Peak Service Interval Minutes 30
Route, traffic and ridership data. Basic route information was taken from the descriptions ear-
lier in this chapter. The specific inputs to the model are given in Table 19.
Note that the analysis is performed for nonholiday weekdays only. It is assumed that freight
trains only will operate on these days, and risks to train occupants at weekends are not affected.
However when a more advanced signal system is installed to reduce and offset the risks from
freight operations, this also will reduce risks of collisions between passenger trains during any
weekend and holiday operations.
The numbers of passenger train trips/day are summarized in Table 20. Option 1 lacks early
morning and evening trips, which are added in Options 2, 3, and 4.
In Options 2, 3, and 4 some midday and evening trips are freight-exposed, in that they pre-
cede, follow or pass an active freight train, including switching an en route industry track. Freight
activity and the corresponding number of freight-exposed trips in Options 2, 3 and 4 are sum-
marized in Table 21. In full temporal separation (Option 1), no passenger trips are exposed to
risk from freight operations.
The higher number of freight-exposed trips in Option 2 is due to the lower freight operating
speed and the extra time needed to make the moves over diamonds. In this option the freight
exposure is to intrusion accidents and the diamond crossing movements.
Average train occupancy, needed in the calculation of injuries and fatalities, is displayed in
Table 22 for each operating period.
Accident frequency and consequences for train-train collisions were estimated from FRA acci-
dent data for commuter rail collisions. Intrusion collision incidents are based on FRA data for
existing mixed passenger and freight operations. Data for all other accident scenarios, including
grade crossing collisions, derailment and obstruction also were derived from FRA studies.
Results and Risk Analysis Findings
Table 23 shows estimated numbers of accidents for each accident scenario. Tables 24 and 25
provide the injury rate and fatality rate per million passenger miles respectively. Details of the
accident scenarios are in the Task 10 Report.
Results show a slight increase in the number of collision accidents in Option 2 compared with
Option 1 (due mainly to more trips), and a substantial reduction in collision accidents for
Options 3 and 4, in spite of the increased train miles and the increase in intrusion collision risks
that arise from concurrent passenger and freight operations. The change is primarily due to the
Table 20. Passenger trips by time of day.
Traffic Parameter Option 1 Option 2, 3 and 4
Peak Service, Peak Direction 23 23
Peak Service Reverse Direction 23 23
Midday 28 28
Early Morning and Evening 0 24
OCR for page 71
Table 21. Exposure of passenger trips to freight activity.
Parameter Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Operating Parallel operations Shared single track Shared double track
Regime
Midday Freight One round trip, no One round trip, Same as Option 3
Activity industry switching switches one industry
track
Evening Freight One round trip, One round trip, Same as Option 3
Activity switched both industry switches one industry
tracks track
Midday Freight- 12 8 8
Exposed Trips
Evening Freight- 10 8 8
Exposed Trips
Table 22. Occupancy of passenger train by
operating period.
Total Occupants (Standees in Brackets)
Operating Period Option 1 Option 2, 3, and 4
Peak Period Peak 153 (18) 151 (11)
Direction
Peak Period Reverse 19 19
Direction
Midday 75 (2) 79 (3)
Early Morning and 0 29
Evening
Table 23. Estimated FRA-reportable train accidents over 10 years for
each option.
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Accident Scenario Full Temporal Concurrent Concurrent Concurrent
Separation Separate Shared Shared
(Base Case) Single Tracks Single Track Double Track
Train-Train Collisions 0.181 0.171 0.079 0.039
Intrusion Collisions 0.009 0.021 0.021 0.024
Diamond Collisions 0 0.023 0 0.014
All Train Collisions 0.190 0.215 0.099 0.077
Derailments 0.092 0.122 0.122 0.122
Obstructions 0.198 0.262 0.262 0.262
Grade Crossings 1.032 1.366 1.366 1.366
Total Accidents 1.51 1.94 1.85 1.81
Train-Miles (millions) 1.54 2.03 2.03 2.03
Accident Rate per 0.98 0.96 0.91 0.89
million train miles
Table 24. Estimated rates of passenger injuries for each option.
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Accident Scenario Full Temporal Concurrent Concurrent Concurrent
Separation Separate Shared Shared
(Base Case) Single Tracks Single Track Double Track
Train-Train Collisions 2.989 2.458 1.203 0.595
Intrusion Collisions 0.075 0.134 0.134 0.152
Diamond Collisions 0 0.007 0 0.004
All Train Collisions 3.064 2.60 1.34 0.75
Derailments 0.226 0.255 0.255 0.255
Obstructions 0.097 0.110 0.110 0.110
Grade Crossings 0 1.141 1.141 1.141
Total Accidents 4.40 4.09 2.84 2.23
Passenger miles 125.7 141.5 141.5 141.5
(millions)
Injury Rate per million 35.02 28.96 20.09 15.70
passenger miles