Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 56
56 References (1) AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways, Motion to Amend (15) Markow, Michael J. NCHRP Synthesis 371: Managing Selected the Definition to Advocate the Principles of Transportation Asset Transportation Assets: Signals, Lighting, Signs, Pavement Markings, Management, May 6, 2006. Culverts, and Sidewalks. Transportation Research Board of the (2) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Dou- National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. glas, Inc., Roy Jorgensen Associates, Inc., and P. T. Thompson. (16) Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. Use of Highway Maintenance Transportation Asset Management Guide, AASHTO publication Management Systems in State Highway Agencies, 2006. RP-TAMG-1, Contractor's Final Report prepared for NCHRP (17) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Michael D. Meyer. U.S. Domestic Project 20-24(11), 2002. Scan Program: Best Practices in Transportation Asset Management, (3) Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., and B. Davis. Transport-Related Scan Tour Report, NCHRP Project 20-68, 2007. Impacts of the Northridge Earthquake. Journal of Transportation (18) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Texas Transportation Institute, Uni- and Statistics, Volume I, Number 2, 1998. versity of Washington and Dowling Associates. NCHRP Web-Only (4) NCHRP Report 551: Performance Measures and Targets for Trans- Document 97: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurement-- portation Asset Management. Transportation Research Board of Final Report and Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. (5) Science Applications International Corp. 2002 AASHTO Guide to (19) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff and Venner Highway Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Asset Identification Consulting, Inc. NCHRP Web-Only Document 103: Final Report for and Protection, Contractor's Final Report prepared for NCHRP NCHRP Research Results Digest 317: Prototype Software for an Envi- Project 20-07/Task 151B, 2002. ronmental Information Management and Decision Support System. (6) Science Applications International Corp. and PB Consult. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- Guide to Risk Management of Multimodal Transportation Infra- ington, D.C., 2007. structure, Draft Final Report prepared for NCHRP Project (20) Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. 2059(17), 2007. Progress in Developing the National Asset Database, Publication (7) Patidar, V., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and P. Thompson. NCHRP Report OIG-060-40, 2006. 590: Multiple-Objective Optimization for Bridge Management Sys- (21) Moteff, John. Critical Infrastructure: The National Asset Database, tems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Publication Washington, D.C., 2007. RL33648, 2007. (8) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., PB Consult, and System Metrics (22) Friedman, David, Monteith, M. C., Kay, D. H., Couts, V. B., Group, Inc. NCHRP Report 545: Analytical Tools for Asset Manage- Trombly, J. W., Bratvold, D., and I. Hirshmann. NCHRP Report ment. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 525 Volume 11: Disruption Impact Estimating Tool--Transportation Washington, D.C., 2005. (DIETT)--A Tool for Prioritizing High-Value Transportation Choke (9) FHWA. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Reassess- Points. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, ment 2010+ Final Recommendations Report, 2008. 2006. (10) AASHTO. AASHTO Guide for Commonly Recognized (CoRe) (23) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Multimodal Transportation: Develop- Structural Elements, 1997 (amended 2001). ment of a Performance-Based Planning Process, NCHRP Research (11) FHWA. Guidelines for the Installation, Maintenance, and Repair, of Results Digest 226, 1998. Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals, (24) http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/CS/PERFORMANCE/ accessed in 2007. August 2008. (12) FHWA. Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Manual, 2005. (25) http://dashboard.virginiadot.org/ accessed in August 2008. (13) AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA Joint Committee, Asset Management Data (26) AASHTO. Measuring Performance Among State DOTs, 2006. Collection Guide: Task Force 45 Report, 2006. (27) FHWA. Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2006 (14) Smith, K. L., Stivers, M. L., Hoemer, T. E., and A. R. Romine. Conditions and Performance Report, 2006. NCHRP Web Document 8: Highway Maintenance Quality Assur- (28) U.S. Department of Transportation. Fiscal Year 2006 Performance ance. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. and Accountability Report, 2006.