Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
56 (1) AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways, Motion to Amend the Definition to Advocate the Principles of Transportation Asset Management, May 6, 2006. (2) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Dou- glas, Inc., Roy Jorgensen Associates, Inc., and P. T. Thompson. Transportation Asset Management Guide, AASHTO publication RP-TAMG-1, Contractorâs Final Report prepared for NCHRP Project 20-24(11), 2002. (3) Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., and B. Davis. Transport-Related Impacts of the Northridge Earthquake. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Volume I, Number 2, 1998. (4) NCHRP Report 551: Performance Measures and Targets for Trans- portation Asset Management. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. (5) Science Applications International Corp. 2002 AASHTO Guide to Highway Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Asset Identification and Protection, Contractorâs Final Report prepared for NCHRP Project 20-07/Task 151B, 2002. (6) Science Applications International Corp. and PB Consult. Guide to Risk Management of Multimodal Transportation Infra- structure, Draft Final Report prepared for NCHRP Project 20â59(17), 2007. (7) Patidar, V., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and P. Thompson. NCHRP Report 590: Multiple-Objective Optimization for Bridge Management Sys- tems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. (8) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., PB Consult, and System Metrics Group, Inc. NCHRP Report 545: Analytical Tools for Asset Manage- ment. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005. (9) FHWA. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Reassess- ment 2010+ Final Recommendations Report, 2008. (10) AASHTO. AASHTO Guide for Commonly Recognized (CoRe) Structural Elements, 1997 (amended 2001). (11) FHWA. Guidelines for the Installation, Maintenance, and Repair, of Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals, 2007. (12) FHWA. Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Manual, 2005. (13) AASHTO-AGC-ARTBA Joint Committee, Asset Management Data Collection Guide: Task Force 45 Report, 2006. (14) Smith, K. L., Stivers, M. L., Hoemer, T. E., and A. R. Romine. NCHRP Web Document 8: Highway Maintenance Quality Assur- ance. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. (15) Markow, Michael J. NCHRP Synthesis 371: Managing Selected Transportation Assets: Signals, Lighting, Signs, Pavement Markings, Culverts, and Sidewalks. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. (16) Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. Use of Highway Maintenance Management Systems in State Highway Agencies, 2006. (17) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and Michael D. Meyer. U.S. Domestic Scan Program: Best Practices in Transportation Asset Management, Scan Tour Report, NCHRP Project 20-68, 2007. (18) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Texas Transportation Institute, Uni- versity of Washington and Dowling Associates. NCHRP Web-Only Document 97: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurementâ Final Report and Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. (19) Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff and Venner Consulting, Inc. NCHRP Web-Only Document 103: Final Report for NCHRP Research Results Digest 317: Prototype Software for an Envi- ronmental Information Management and Decision Support System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2007. (20) Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. Progress in Developing the National Asset Database, Publication OIG-060-40, 2006. (21) Moteff, John. Critical Infrastructure: The National Asset Database, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Publication RL33648, 2007. (22) Friedman, David, Monteith, M. C., Kay, D. H., Couts, V. B., Trombly, J. W., Bratvold, D., and I. Hirshmann. NCHRP Report 525 Volume 11: Disruption Impact Estimating ToolâTransportation (DIETT)âA Tool for Prioritizing High-Value Transportation Choke Points. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2006. (23) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Multimodal Transportation: Develop- ment of a Performance-Based Planning Process, NCHRP Research Results Digest 226, 1998. (24) http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/CS/PERFORMANCE/ accessed in August 2008. (25) http://dashboard.virginiadot.org/ accessed in August 2008. (26) AASHTO. Measuring Performance Among State DOTs, 2006. (27) FHWA. Status of the Nationâs Highways, Bridges, and Transit: 2006 Conditions and Performance Report, 2006. (28) U.S. Department of Transportation. Fiscal Year 2006 Performance and Accountability Report, 2006. References