Performance Measurement Framework for Highway Capacity Decision Making (2009)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

69BibliographyGeneral Use of Performance Measures by Transportation Agencies Bremmer, D., Cotton, K.C., and Hamilton, B. Emerging Performance Measurement Responses to Changing Political Pressures at State Depart- ments of Transportation: Practitioners’ Perspective. Transportation Research Board, 2005. Brown, Mark. Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World- Class Performance. Quality Resources, New York, New York, 1996. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP Report 551: Performance Measures and Targets for Transportation Asset Management. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP Report 446: A Guidebook for Per- formance-Based Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board; Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 2000. Government Performance Project. Survey Results 2005: Categories, The Agencies. Government Performance Project, Washington, D.C., Last updated 2007. Available at http://www.gpponline.org. Referenced on July 13, 2007. Hendren, P.G., Neumann, L.A., and Pickrell, S.M. Linking Perfor- mance-Based Program Development and Delivery. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22-24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36) (2005), pages 121-130. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP36.pdf. Kassoff, H. (2001). Implementing Performance Measurement in Trans- portation Agencies. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 29-November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations (2001), pages 47-58. Available at http://www.trb.org/publications/conf/reports/cp_26.pdf. Larson, M.C. Organizing for Performance Management. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22-24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36) (2005), pages 99-120. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP36.pdf. Meyer, M. Measuring That Which Cannot Be Measured – At Least According to Conventional Wisdom. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 9-November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations (2001), pages 105-125. Available at http://www.trb.org/publications/conf/reports/ cp_26.pdf. Padgett, R. NCHRP 8-36, Task 47: Effective Organization of Performance Measurement. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006. Performance Measurement Exchange. Performance Measurement Exchange. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Lastupdated July 13, 2007. Available at http://knowledge.fhwa.dot.gov/ cops/p.m..nsf/home. Referenced on July 13, 2007. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 29- November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations (2001), 227 pages. Available at http://www.trb.org/publications/conf/reports/cp_26.pdf. Pickrell, S., and Neumann, L. Use of Performance Measures in Trans- portation Decision-Making. Report of a Conference, Irvine, Cali- fornia, October 29-November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations: Summary of the Second National Conference (2001), pages 17-33. Available at http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/conf/reports/cp_26.pdf. Poister, T.H., Margolis, D.L., and Zimmerman, D.E. Strategic Manage- ment at the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation: A Results- Driven Approach (2004). Transportation Research Record (1885), pages 56-64. Poister, T.H. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 238: Performance Measurement in State Departments of Transportation. Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1997. Poister, T.H. NCHRP Synthesis 326: Strategic Planning and Decision- Making in State Departments of Transportation. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004. Poister, T.H. Performance Measurement in Transportation: State of the Practice. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22-24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36) (2005), pages 81-98. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/online- pubs/conf/CP36.pdf. Poister, T.H., and Van Slyke, D.M. NCHRP Web Document 39: Managing Change in State Departments of Transportation. Scan 1 of 8: Innovations in Strategic Leadership and Measurement for State DOTS. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Georgia State Univer- sity, 2001. Shaw, T. NCHRP Synthesis 311: Performance Measures of Operational Effectiveness for Highway Segments and Systems. Transportation Research Board, 2003. TCRP Report 88: A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance- Measurement System. Transportation Research Board; Kittelson and Associates, Inc., 2003. TransTech Management, Inc. Strategic Performance Measures for State Departments of Transportation: A Handbook for CEOs and Execu- tives. TransTech Management, Inc.; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2003.

70TransTech Management, Inc. Measuring Performance Among State DOTs. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; Federal Highway Administration; Washington, D.C., 2006. Transportation System Monitoring and Enhancement Adams, L.H., Harrison, F.D., and Vandervalk, A. Issues and Challenges in Using Existing Data and Tools for Performance Measurement. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22-24, 2004. Sec- ond National Conference on Performance Measures (36) (2005), pages 131-140. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ conf/CP36.pdf. American Planning Association. Land-Based Classification Standards: www.planning.org/lbcs/. Bahar, G., Masliah, M., Mollett, C., and Persaud, B. NCHRP Report 501: Integrated Safety Management Process. Transportation Research Board; iTRANS Consulting, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2003. Bhat, C.R., Bricka, S., La Mondia, J., Kapur, A., Guo, J.Y., and Sen, S. Metropolitan Area Transit Accessibility Analysis Tool. Report No. 0-5178-P3). Texas University; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2006. Brydia, R.E., Schneider IV, W.H., Mattingly, S.P., Sattler, M.L., and Upayokin, A. Operations-Oriented Performance Measures for Freeway Management Systems: Year 1 Report No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5292-1). Texas Transportation Institute; Texas Department of Transporta- tion; Federal Highway Administration, Austin, Texas, 2007. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP Report 446: A Guidebook for Per- formance-Based Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board; Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2000. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP 7-15, Task 1.3: Cost-Effective Mea- sures and Planning Procedures for Travel Time, Delay, and Reliabil- ity. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP Research Results Digest 312: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurement. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007. Chen, C., Li, W., and Kwan, M. Point-Based Accessibility and Individual- Based Accessibility. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. 18 pages. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007. Donaldson, B.M., and Weber, J.T. Use of a GIS-Based Model of Habitat Cores and Landscape Corridors for the Virginia Department of Trans- portation’s Project Planning and Environmental Scoping. Virginia Transportation Research Council; Virginia Department of Trans- portation; Federal Highway Administration, 2006. El-Geneidy, A.M., and Levinson, D.M. Access to Destinations: Devel- opment of Accessibility Measures. University of Minnesota, Min- neapolis; Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2006. Federal Geographic Data Committee: www.fgdc.gov/metadata/ geospatial-metadata-standards. Harrison, R., Schofield, M., Loftus-Otway, L., Middleton, D., and West, J. Developing Freight Highway Corridor Performance Measure Strate- gies in Texas No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5410-1). Texas University, Austin; Texas Department of Transportation; Federal Highway Administra- tion, Austin, Texas, 2006. Hendren and Meyers. NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 53 (02): Peer Exchange Series on State and Metropolitan Transportation Planning Issues. Meeting 2: Non-Traditional Performance Measures. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.Levinson, D.M., and Krizek, K.J. Access to Destinations. Elsevier, 2005. MacDonald, D., Yew, C.P., Arnold, R., Baxter, J., Halvorson, R.K., Kas- soff, H. et al. Transportation Performance Measures in Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand. American Trade Initiatives; Fed- eral Highway Administration; American Association of State High- way and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2004. Meyer, M. Measuring That Which Cannot Be Measured – At Least According to Conventional Wisdom. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 29-November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations (2001). Pages 105-125. Available at http://www.trb.org/publications/conf/ reports/cp_26.pdf. Muller, B., Johnson, L.E., Wyckoff, J.W., Nuszdorfer, F., and Beckham, B. Areawide Cumulative Effects Analysis Using GIS. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. 18 pages. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007. National Biological Information Infrastructure. www.nbii.gov/portal/ server.pt. National Information Exchange Model. www.neim.gov/index.php. Randall, J.E. (Forthcoming, 2007). NCHRP 03-81: Strategies for Inte- grated Operation of Freeway and Arterial Corridors. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Shaw, T. NCHRP Synthesis 311: Performance Measures of Operational Effectiveness for Highway Segments and Systems. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003. Environmental Stewardship American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). AASHTO Center for Environmental Excellence (2007). Available at http://environment.transportation.org/. Last accessed on August 3, 2007. Amekudzi, A., and Meyer, M.D. NCHRP Report 541: Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning. Trans- portation Research Board, 2005. Bracaglia, F. NCHRP Web Document 79: Monitoring, Analyzing, and Reporting on the Environmental Streamlining Pilot Projects. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. Brown, J.W. Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infra- structure Projects. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Federal Highway Administration, 2006. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (forthcoming). NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 23: Guidelines for Environmental Performance Measurements. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff, and Venner Con- sulting, Inc. NCHRP Web Only Document 103: Final Report for NCHRP Research Results Digest 317: Prototype Software for an Envi- ronmental Information Management and Decision Support System. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006. Center for Sustainable Transportation (CST). Sustainable Transporta- tion Performance Indicators Project. University of Winnipeg, Win- nipeg, Manitoba, 2001. DOT-Funded Positions and Other Support to Resource and Regulatory Agencies, Tribes, and Non-Governmental Organizations for Environ- mental Stewardship and Streamlining Initiatives. (2005). Retrieved July 12, 2007. Available at http://environment.transportation.org/ center/products_programs/dot_funded.aspx. Environmental plan: improving environmental sustainability and public health in New Zealand (2004). Transit New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand. Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews: Executive Order Implementation. U.S. Department of

71Transportation, Washington, D.C. Last updated December 2006. Available at http://www.dot.gov/execorder/13274/index.htm. Refer- enced on July 12, 2007. Environmental Research Needs in Transportation: Report of a Confer- ence, Washington, D.C., March 21-23, 2002. (2002). Washington, D.C. Page 268. Available At http://trb.org/publications/conf/reports/ cp_28.pdf. Evink, G.L. NCHRP Synthesis 305: Interaction Between Roadways and Wildlife Ecology. Transportation Research Board, 2002. FHWA (1999), The Environmental Guidebook, Federal Highway Admin- istration, FHWA-99-005. Last updated 2007. Available at www. fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/index.htm. Referenced on July 12, 2007. FHWA Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (2007). Environmen- tal Review Toolkit, Streamlining and Stewardship. Last updated July 2007. Available at http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/index. asp. Referenced on July 12, 2007. Washington, D.C. The Gallup Organization. Implementing Performance Measurement in Environmental Streamlining, prepared for U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004. The Green Highways Initiative: http://www.greenhighways.org. Litman, T. Well Measured – Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning. Victoria, BC: Victoria Trans- port Policy Institute, Canada, 2005. The Louis Berger Group, Inc. NCHRP Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effects of Proposed Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. Measures, Markers, and Mileposts: The Gray Notebook for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2007. Washington State Department of Trans- portation, Olympia, Washington, 2007. Paving the Way to Cleaner, Greener Highways, the Mid-Atlantic Green Highways Initiative, January 2006. Schwartz, M. Technologies to Improve Consideration of Environmen- tal Concerns in Transportation Decisions. NCHRP Research Results Digest (304), page 37, 2006. State DOT Environmental Programs: Evaluation and Performance Mea- sures. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Research, Devel- opment, and Technology Transfer, Madison, Wisconsin, 2007. Sustainable Development Strategy, 2007-2009 (2006). No. TP 13123. Ottawa, Ontario: Transport Canada. Available at http://www.tc. gc.ca/programs/environment/SD/sds0709/menu.htm. Accessed on July 12, 2007. TERM 2001: Indicators Tracking Transport and Environment Integration in the European Union: Summary. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001. Thieman, S. Strategic Transportation, Environmental Planning Process for Urbanizing Places (STEP UP). 10th National Conference on Trans- portation Planning for Small- and Medium-Sized Communities. Page 11, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006. Venner, M. Managing Environmental Performance at State Transporta- tion Agencies. Transportation Research Record (1859), pages 9-18, 2003. Venner, M. NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 10: Early Mitigation for Net Envi- ronmental Benefit: Meaningful Off-Setting Measures for Unavoidable Impacts. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. Virginia Geographic Information Network (VGIN) (2007). Virginia Geographic Information Network. Last accessed on August 13, 2007. Accessible at http://www.vgin.state.va.us/. Wisconsin Land Information Clearinghouse (WiscLINC) (2007). Wis- consin Land Information Clearinghouse. Last accessed on August 13, 2007. Accessible at http://www.sco.wisc.edu/wisclinc/.Community Enhancement American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design. Washington, D.C., 2004. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP 08-36, Task 11: Technical Methods to Support Analysis of Environmental-Justice Issues. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP 08-36, Task 12A: Analysis of the Factors Affecting Future Transportation Environment and their Impli- cations for State DOTs. Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C., 2002. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP 08-36, Task 22: Demonstrating the Positive Impacts of Transportation Investments on Economic, Social, Environmental, Community, and Quality of Life Issues. Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation Impacts of Smart Growth and Comprehensive Planning Initiatives. Prepared for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and Fed- eral Highway Administration through National Cooperative High- way Research Program Project 25-25(02), 2004. Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrell, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y.H., Arrington, G.B. et al. TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004. Edwards, M.R., Peer, R.L., Lindner, E., and Klein, T.H. NCHRP Report 542: Evaluating Cultural Resource Significance: Implementation Tools. Transportation Research Board, URS Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2005. Flexibility in Highway Design. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 1997. Forkenbrock, D.J., and Sheeley, J. NCHRP Report 532: Effective Meth- ods for Environmental Justice Assessment. Transportation Research Board, University of Iowa, Iowa City; Washington, D.C., 2004. Forkenbrock, D.J., and Weisbrod, G.E. NCHRP Report 456: Guidebook for Assessing the Social and Economic Effects of Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board; University of Iowa, Iowa City, 2001. ICF Consulting. Handbook on Integrating Land Use Considerations into Transportation Projects to Address Induced Growth No. NCHRP 25- 25/Task 03). Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. NCHRP Report 423A: Land Use Impacts of Transportation: A Guidebook. Transportation Research Board; Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1999. Neuman, T.R., Schwartz, M., Clark, L., Bednar, J., Forbes, D., Vomacka, D. et al., (2002). NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions. Transportation Research Board; EDAW, Inc., Washington, D.C., 2002. The Louis Berger Group, Inc. NCHRP Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effects of Proposed Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002. Thinking Beyond the Pavement. AASHTO Quarterly Magazine, 77(3). Pages 7-34, 1998. TransTech Management, Inc. NCHRP Web Document 69: Performance Measures for Context Sensitive Solutions – A Guidebook for State DOTs (2004). Washington, D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program. July 15, 2007, Available at http://trb.org/ publications/nchrp/nchrp_w69.pdf. Ward, B.G. Measuring the Effectiveness of Community Impact Assessment: Recommended Core Measures No. FDOT BC353-28). University of South Florida, Tampa; Florida Department of Transportation; Fed- eral Highway Administration, Tallahassee, Florida, 2005.

72Economic Impact and Development Babcock, M.W. Approximation of the Economic Impacts of the Kansas Com- prehensive Transportation Program. Kansas State University, Manhat- tan; Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, Kansas, 2004. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NCHRP 08-36, Task 12A: Analysis of the Factors Affecting Future Transportation Environment and their Impli- cations for State DOTs. Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C., 2002. Cox, W. Maximizing Urban Transport Economic Benefits: Urban Per- formance Indicators. Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport. 9th International Conference (Thredbo 9). Pages 231-246, 2007. Economic Analysis Primer. Federal Highway Administration. Washing- ton, D.C., 2003. Economic Development Research Group, Inc. Monetary Valuation per Dollar of Investment in Different Performance Measures. Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program and AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007. Highway and Transit Investments: Options for Improving Information on Projects’ Benefits and Costs and Increasing Accountability for Results. No. GAO-05-172. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Wash- ington, D.C., 2005. Lakshmanan, T.R., and Chatterjee, L.R. Economic Consequences of Transport Improvements. Access (26). Pages 28-33, 2005.Lewis, D. NCHRP Report 342: Primer on Transportation, Productivity and Economic Development. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1991. A Manual on User Benefit Analysis of Highway and Bus-Transit Improve- ments, 1977. American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1978. Pickton, T., Clements, J., and Felsburg, R.W. Statewide Economic Benefits of Transportation Investment. BBC Research & Consulting; Felsburg Holt & Ullevig; Colorado Department of Transportation; Federal Highway Administration, Denver, Colorado, 2007. Rose, D.C., Gluck, J., Williams, K., and Kramer, J. NCHRP Report 548: A Guidebook for Including Access Management in Transporta- tion Planning. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005. Roskin, M. (2003). Transportation and Economic Development 2002. Transportation and Economic Development 2002 Confe- rence, Portland Oregon. 104 pages. Available at http://gulliver.trb. org/publications/circulars/ec050.pdf. Transportation Research Board. Weisbrod, G., Vary, D., and Treyz, G. NCHRP Report 463: Economic Implications of Congestion. Transportation Research Board; Cam- bridge Systematics, Inc., 2001. Weisbrod, G., and Weisbrod, B. (1997). Assessing the Economic Impact of Transportation Projects: How to Choose the Appropriate Tech- nique for Your Project. Transportation Research Circular (477). Page 28, 1997.