National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 134: Transit, Call Centers, and 511: A Guide for Decision Makers (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "3.1.1.2 Information Provided by Transit Agencies." TCRP Report 134: Transit, Call Centers, and 511: A Guide for Decision Makers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
18
bottomleft bottomright
Page
18
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-7)
1.1 Background (8-8)
1.3 Research Tasks (9-9)
2.2 National Inventory of Operational 511 Systems (10-10)
2.3 Transit Agency Case Studies (11-12)
2.4 Non-Transit Call Center Interviews (13-13)
2.6 Transit Rider Focus Group (14-16)
3.1.1.1 Customer Information Needs and Preferences (17-17)
3.1.1.2 Information Provided by Transit Agencies (18-18)
3.1.1.3 Dissemination Methods/Technologies Utilized (19-19)
3.1.1.4 Matching Dissemination Methods/Technologies with Customer Needs and Preferences (20-21)
3.1.2.3 Technologies (22-24)
3.1.2.4 Metrics (25-25)
3.1.3 Implications of Agency Size and Type (26-27)
3.2.2 Implications for Transit Agencies (28-28)
3.3.2.1 Operational 511 Systems (29-29)
3.3.2.2 Transit Agency Participation in 511 Systems (30-31)
3.3.3.1 Customer Information and Call Center Approaches (32-32)
3.3.3.2 Participation in Non-511 Traveler Information Systems (33-33)
3.3.4 Transit-Related 511 Operating Statistics (34-34)
3.4 Transit Agency Case Studies (35-35)
3.4.1.1 Arizona 511 (36-37)
3.4.1.2 El Dorado Transit (Sacramento California, Area) (38-38)
3.4.1.4 Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority (39-39)
3.4.1.5 Island Explorer (Bar Harbor, Maine) (40-40)
3.4.1.7 Charlotte Area Transit (North Carolina) (41-41)
3.4.1.8 San Diego 511 (42-44)
3.4.1.10 Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority (45-45)
3.4.1.12 Southeast Florida 511 (46-51)
3.4.1.13 San Francisco Bay Area 511 (52-61)
3.4.2.1 Manchester Transit Authority (New Hampshire) (62-62)
3.4.2.3 King County Metro Transit (Seattle) (63-63)
3.4.3.2 Regional Transit District (Denver) (64-64)
3.4.3.4 Tri-Met (Portland) (65-65)
3.5.1 Rationale for Transit Content Decisions (66-66)
3.6 Transit Rider Focus Group (67-67)
3.6.2 Transit Information on 511 (68-69)
4.1.1.1 National Overview of 511 Systems and Transit Participation (70-70)
4.1.1.3 Transit Rationale for Participation/Non-Participation in 511 (71-71)
4.1.1.4 Impacts of 511 Participation on Transit Agencies (72-73)
4.1.2.1 Buy-In on 511 as a Multimodal Resource (74-74)
4.1.3.2 Transit Information on 511 (75-75)
4.1.4.1 The Role of the Telephone in Transit Customer Information (76-76)
4.2.1.1 General Recommendations on the Applicability of Basic and Additional Transit Information on 511 (77-77)
4.2.1.2 Basic Transit Information (78-78)
4.2.2.1 Consider Greater Utilization of Proven, Advanced Technologies and Techniques (79-80)
4.3 Plan for Implementing the Research Findings (81-82)
References (83-84)
Appendix A - Transit Agency Interview Questionnaire (85-87)
Appendix B - Transit Rider Focus Group Discussion Guide (88-89)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (90-90)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
18 A consumer research study was conducted by the Utah 511 than 30 min), or riders traveling to unfamiliar locations, are advisory group and a Bay Area TravInfoŽ focus group to de- most likely to use 511. termine the needs and preferences of transit customers with respect to 511 traveler information. (TravInfo was the San 3.1.1.2 Information Provided by Transit Agencies Francisco Bay Area intermodal traveler information system that preceded the Bay Area 511 system.) Based on the data re- The literature includes the results of a nationwide survey ceived from respondents, it was found that transit information of transit agencies in the United States that identified the can be defined according to the following seven categories (8), types of information agencies provide to their customers. Of which are listed in order of importance: the 30 transit agencies that responded to the survey, most provided at least the following types of information: (11) ˇ Schedules and on-time status, ˇ Transit news/updates, ˇ Operational information (e.g., route detours); ˇ Routes and maps, ˇ Route and schedule information; ˇ Conveniences (such as elevators and bike racks), ˇ Proposed service changes; ˇ Fares, ˇ Public meeting information; ˇ Contact information for transit operators, and ˇ Security; ˇ System regulations. ˇ Safety (e.g., mind the gap); ˇ General information (e.g., how to ride, fare information); Also, it was also found that riders usually need traveler in- and formation when they are making a trip that they normally do ˇ Transit in the community (e.g., transit agency teamed with not make, when there are service disruptions, or when they local business). need to know the real-time status of a transit vehicle. (9) In 2001, another survey was conducted by ITS America to One of the questions asked of the transit agencies inter- determine the information needs of travelers. Among the sur- viewed for this study pertained to the type of information they vey respondents, 20% were transit riders. The survey revealed provide to customers. The results--consistent with the general that the transit customers want to know about service delays, needs and preferences of customers (as detailed in the previous travel time or arrival time estimates, and the level of crowding section on Customer Information Needs and Preferences)-- on transit vehicles. The respondents wanted such information indicate that most transit agency customer information fo- to be in real time and updated every 10 to 15 min. (10) The sur- cuses on trip planning, schedule, fare, and how-to-ride infor- vey also showed that commuters making longer trips (greater mation. Figure 1 summarizes the interview results related to 25 (out of 25 interviewed) Number of Agencies 20 15 10 5 0 e e d le s g us r ns rid un bu in u Fa at ed ok io fo to e st st h th bo nd Sc ow ge e is m a d ug H an -ti re st /s l Lo he ea g ts n W R n ni ai an pl pl om ip C Tr Information Type Figure 1. Transit information disseminated by transit agency call center.