Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 74
74 A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods The six-step process forms the basis for the Project Delivery Decision Report. Steps 1 through 5 can be combined for a complete report. The advantage/disadvantage checklist and the related comments will be important to documentation. An executive summary should be added to the beginning of the report to summarize the decision. Any pertinent data or research (e.g., sched- ule constraint calculations, delivery code research, and so forth) should be added as appendices. A suggested Project Delivery Decision Report outline is offered below: 1. Executive Summary 2. Project Description 3. Project Goals 4. Delivery Methods Considered 5. Advantages and Disadvantages 6. Delivery Method Decision 7. Appendices Conclusion The Tier 1--Analytical Delivery Decision Approach provides airports with a structured approach to choosing the most appropriate project delivery method for each individual project. At the end of Step 5, there may be a single, clear, and logical choice for a project delivery method. If this is the case, that delivery method should be selected and the decision documented in a Proj- ect Delivery Decision Report. If, at the end of this stage, a dominant choice has not emerged, the airport should document the results and move to the Tier 2 approach for a more detailed analy- sis of the remaining delivery methods.