National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 21: A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods (2009)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Touran, Ali, Gransberg, Douglas D, Molenaar, Keith R, Ghavamifar, Kamran, Bakhshi, Payam, Transportation Research Board. "Conclusion." ACRP Report 21: A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
83
bottomleft bottomright
Page
83

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 83
Tier 2--Weighted-Matrix Delivery Decision Approach 83 Conclusion The Tier 2--Weighted-Matrix Delivery Decision Approach extends the Tier 1 approach through an examination of how project delivery methods align with project goals and pertinent issues as they are consolidated into selection factors. The weighted ranking of project selection factors requires decision-makers to define their priorities and more closely examine the attri- butes of each delivery method that passed through the Tier 1 filter. At the end of Step 4, there should be a single, clear, and logical choice for a project delivery method, and this choice can be documented in the Project Delivery Decision Report.