Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 10
CHAPTER 3
Performance Data for Rural DRT
Measuring and assessing rural DRT performance require that performance data be identified and
defined. This is an important step that will help improve consistency in data definitions and report-
ing. Particularly at rural transit systems there may be limited administrative staff for data collection
tasks, and these tasks may be burdensome without technology tools such as a computer-assisted
scheduling/dispatch (CASD) system. Data on DRT may be intermingled with data for other service
modes, such as route deviation, but consistent data reporting practices are needed for assessing rural
DRT performance. This chapter identifies key performance data for rural DRT systems and also
reviews other data elements that are often collected for performance assessment purposes.
3.1 Performance Data--Which Data Elements Are
Particularly Important?
This Guidebook's companion guidebook on urban DRT systems, TCRP Report 124, identi-
fied a long list of data elements that DRT systems can consider for data collection and assessment
purposes. This list was then distilled to six key data elements for performance assessment, in
keeping with the research project's objective of selecting a limited number of performance data
elements and measures.
For rural DRT systems, a similar set of six data elements is used for this Guidebook as the key
data for performance assessment purposes:
· Vehicle-hours,
· Vehicle-miles,
· Passenger trips,
· Total operating expense,
· Accidents/safety incidents, and
· On-time trips
In addition to these data elements, a number of others are identified and discussed in this
chapter. These additional data elements and related performance measures provide rural DRT
systems with additional resources for assessing their performance.
3.2 Performance Data for Rural DRT--Now There Is NTD
With the Rural NTD established in 2006 for transit systems operating in rural areas, transit
managers at the nation's rural systems must now comply with specific federal reporting require-
ments. NTD reporting has been a staple for urban transit systems since the 1970s, and adoption
of standardized reporting for rural systems in 2006 is a positive progression.
10