National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 136: Guidebook for Rural Demand-Response Transportation: Measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance (2009)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Ellis, Elizabeth, McCollom, Brian, Transportation Research Board. "2.1 Rural DRT - It's Different." TCRP Report 136: Guidebook for Rural Demand-Response Transportation: Measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
3
bottomleft bottomright
Page
3
Front Matter (R1-R9)
1.1 Development of Guidebook and Relationship to TCRP Report 124 (1-1)
1.2 Guidebook Organization (2-2)
2.1 Rural DRT - It's Different (3-3)
2.2 The Rural Transit Environment (4-6)
2.3 What Does All This Mean for Rural DRT Performance Assessment? (7-9)
3.2 Performance Data for Rural DRT - Now There Is NTD (10-10)
3.3 Key Performance Data for Rural DRT Performance Assessment (11-17)
3.4 Other Performance Data for Rural DRT Performance Assessment (18-21)
3.5 Rural DRT - Performance Data to Measure Transit Impact (22-22)
4.1 Key Performance Measures for Assessing Rural DRT (23-28)
4.2 Additional Performance Measures (29-30)
4.3 Transit-Impact Performance Measures (31-32)
5.1 Factors Influencing Rural DRT Performance (33-35)
5.2 Different Methodologies for Assessing DRT Performance (36-37)
5.3 Categorization of Rural DRT Systems (38-45)
6.1 Rural Systems Participating as Representative Systems (46-48)
6.2 Comparing Your Performance Against Other Systems - Performance Data of Representative Rural DRT Systems (49-54)
6.3 Summary Rural DRT Performance Data (55-58)
7.1 Actions for Improving Rural DRT Performance (59-60)
7.2 Performance Improvement Actions - More Details and Selected Experience (61-85)
References (86-87)
Appendix A - Rural NTD Data, Demand-Response-Only Systems, 2007 Report Year (88-88)
Appendix B - Summary Performance Data and System Characteristics by Individual System for Representative Rural DRT Systems, FY07 Data (89-90)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (91-91)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 3
CHAPTER 2 Rural DRT and Why Performance Matters Rural DRT is far more diverse than its urban counterpart. There are many more DRT systems operating in rural areas across the country than there are in urban settings. Of the approximate 1,500 rural systems nationwide, the large majority provides demand-response service; there are only about 400 urban DRT systems. Rural DRT covers a wider range of system types compared with urban DRT as characterized by sponsoring organizations, types of services operated, and geographic size of service area, among other attributes. However, similarly to urban DRT, rural DRT systems are under performance pressures although the pressures may have somewhat different emphasis. Pressures on urban DRT are often related to the growing demand for service and high costs per passenger trip, particularly for ADA paratransit systems, while the issues for rural DRT often relate to funding and the need to stretch limited operating and capital resources. This means that the performance focus in any particular month for a rural DRT system may not be managing ridership demand (as it might be for a large urban ADA paratransit system), but it may well be the ability of the system to keep an aging fleet of vans in road-worthy condition for service each day. This chapter provides a framework for the Guidebook, providing a brief background on rural DRT and the broader environment--geographic, demographic, policy--within which it operates. This environment must be understood when the performance of rural DRT is addressed. 2.1 Rural DRT--It's Different DRT is typically defined as public transit that is not traditional fixed-route, fixed-schedule, but rather a service that responds in some manner or form to individualized requests or demand for transportation service. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has defined DRT as follows: Demand-response is a transit mode comprised of passenger cars, vans or small buses operating in response to calls from passengers or their agents to the transit operator, who then dispatches a vehicle to pick up the passengers and transport them to their destinations. A demand-response (DR) operation is characterized by the following: a. The vehicles do not operate over a fixed-route or on a fixed-schedule except, per- haps, on a temporary basis to satisfy a special need, and 3