Click for next page ( 60


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 59
49 related to vegetation communities and wildlife habitat, and structure assessment was developed to provide an "objective, explains how to manage the habitat, survey and monitor for independent and equitable quantitative system for identify- wildlife, implement best management practices and conser- ing natural resource improvement opportunities." Mary- vation actions, and pursue landowner opportunities (Rousso land's SHA responded to the survey associated with this and Hoehn 2009). research that the Green Infrastructure Assessment has been useful during the highway design process to locate potential forest, wetland, and stream mitigation sites. The database Case Study 2. Vermont Wildlife Linkages has the capacity for "layering in" a variety of natural and And Maryland's Greenprint Program: Two Alternatives To Looking At Important cultural resource information into a GIS format. It also has Landscape Linkages the potential to provide useful information to planners early in the highway planning process. A Smart Map technology was developed to build on the Green Infrastructure data to Twenty-two respondents from across the United States iden- integrate local land uses and other socioeconomic and envi- tified the need to identify, map, and prioritize wildlife con- ronmental resources. This approach has formed the basis nectivity in states and across regions. The majority of efforts for a collaborative watershed approach to environmental in mapping wildlife corridors and areas of connectivity have mitigation for highway projects. This system of GIS data on occurred in western states (e.g., Arizona). The following two natural resources is much broader than a wildlife linkages examples demonstrate how two east coast states have tackled system. It is presented in this case study because it provides wildlife connectivity using different approaches. In states an example of how a state with little of its original wildlife with more intact ecosystems that support a large component communities remaining can prioritize lands and mitigation of original wildlife species, connectivity can be based on based on other ecological attributes, such as wetlands and wildlife movements and preferred habitat modeling. In states natural communities. with little of the original species' assemblages, wildlife con- nectivity mapping is carried out by linking (through protec- tion or restoration) the remaining ecologically intact lands. Case Study 3. National Level Efforts To Standardize Geographic Information System Data Dealing With Natural Resources In 2006, the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Agency released "Ver- mont Wildlife Linkage Habitat Analysis: A GIS-Based, A recurring theme in survey responses was the need to Landscape Level Identification of Potentially Significant standardize data available in a GIS format, and to have all Wildlife Linkage Habitats Associated with State of Vermont data layers in the same place. If professionals can go to a Roadways." This mapping research is presented as a case single source, or at least have the GIS resources provided in study because it was part of an effort that involved work similar formats, then they can more efficiently and timely among personnel of the two agencies to better understand consider environmental resources during ecological survey and address the issues associated with wildlife and roads. efforts. Needs for standards have begun to be addressed for The linkages report and database were developed from a transportation engineers with TERRA, the Transportation GIS-based landscape-level model designed to predict loca- Engineering and Road Research Alliance, which is a part- tions of potentially significant wildlife linkage habitats asso- nership of government, industry, and academia that continu- ciated with state highways. The limitations of this report and ously advances innovations in road design. Perhaps a similar data are that they are specific to only highways: the core central standards organization can be brought together to areas and connectivity zones appear to be defined solely near assist transportation biologists working at the crossroads these roads and are not broad-based zones across the land- of the natural environment and transportation. The natural scape and for other roadways. The findings assist in mitiga- world is managed and regulated by multiple agencies and tion directly related to those specific highways, but do little it is dynamic. Methods of data gathering and access are to help with large-scale long-term planning in areas away quite varied as well. It may not be possible to standardize from the road, or areas where new road projects may go. data methodologies for things as varied as the coastline in Future efforts may address the broader landscape. an estuary, the parts per million of a particular pollutant, acoustic surveys of bats, or satellite imagery of a prairie. A In 2001, the Maryland state legislature created the Green- central standards organization, nonetheless, can begin to Print Program. It was designed to protect lands critical to refer users to standards created by national entities, such as long-term ecological health of the state. The lands identified NatureServe's Natural Heritage program. in this project became known as Maryland's Green Infra- structure [see Maryland Green Infrastructure Assessment in Although the bioregions of United States are quite vari- References]. The objective of this program is to protect the able, efforts to establish several GIS data standards are under most valuable remaining ecological lands in the entire state, way. The National Geospatial Program, for example, was not only those along highway corridors. The Green Infra- developed by the USGS. It provides leadership for USGS