National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Potential Measures for Improving the Identification of Root Causes for Hazardous Materials Crashes
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14336.
×
Page 110
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14336.
×
Page 111

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Battelle. 2001. Comparative Risks of Hazardous Materials and Non-Hazardous Materials Truck Shipment Accidents/ Incidents. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Adminis- tration. http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/documents/hazmatriskfinalreport.pdf. Battelle. April 2005. Hazardous Materials Serious Crash Analysis: Phase 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/ hazmat/Hazardous-Materials-Serious-Crash-Analysis-Phase2-April2005.pdf (accessed Aug, 2009). Blower, D. 1998. The Relative Contribution of Truck Drivers and Passenger Car Drivers to Two-Vehicle, Truck-Car Traffic Crashes. UMTRI 98-25. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Blower, D. 2002. “Vehicle Condition and Heavy Truck Accident Involvement.” In Proc. of the International Truck & Bus Safety & Policy Symposium. Knoxville, TN: Center for Transportation Research, University of Tennessee, and National Safety Council, pp. 311–322. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Project 5 Overview—Developing Common Data on Accident Circumstances. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Transportation Statistics. http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/breadcrumbs/Print Version.cgi?date=23151349 (accessed Sep 2008). Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Rail Equipment—Train Accident Data. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Trans- portation Statistics. http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/breadcrumbs/PrintVersion.cgi?date=23115859 (accessed Sep 2008). Coray Gurnitz Consulting and Abacus Technology. 2007. Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010: 2006 Listening Ses- sion. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Dobbins, James and Mark Abkowitz. Jan 2009. “Use of Emerging Technologies for Marine Accident Data Analy- sis Visualization and Quality Control.” In 2009 TRB 88th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers. DVD. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. User’s Guide to Federal Accidental Release Databases. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Motor Carrier Safety Management Information System Code Book, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. http://mcmiscatalog.fmcsa.dot.gov/beta/Catalogs&Documentation/Documentation/census/mcmis_doc.asp (accessed Aug 2009). Federal Railroad Administration. April 2005. “Human Factors Root Cause Analysis of Accidents/Incidents Involving Remote Control Locomotive Operations.” In Research Results, RR05-05. Washington, D.C.: Federal Railroad Administration. Federal Railroad Administration. May 2003. FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports, DOT/FRA/RRS-22. Washington, D.C.: Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Safety, http://www.google.com/search? sourceid=navclient&aq=0h&oq=&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4SUNA_enUS316US218&q=fra+guide+for+preparing+ accident+%2f+incident+reports (accessed Aug 2009). Federal Railroad Administration. May 2003a. “Chapter 7—Form FRA F 6180.54 Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report.” In FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports, DOT/FRA/RRS-22, Washington, D.C.: Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Safety. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=0h&oq= &ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4SUNA_enUS316US218&q=fra+guide+for+preparing+accident+%2f+incident+reports (accessed Aug 2009). Government Accountability Office. 2005. Highway Safety: Further Opportunities Exist to Improve Data on Crashes Involving Commercial Motor Vehicles. GAO-06-102. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office. 110 References

Hedlund, J. and D. Blower. 2006. Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS) Analysis Series: Using LTCCS Data for Statistical Analyses of Crash Risk. FMCSA-RI-05-037. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. “National Crash Data Bases Underestimate Underride Statistics.” February 1999. Road Management & Engineer- ing Journal. http://www.usroads.com/journals/rmej/9902/rm990202.htm. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2002. 2002 FARS Coding and Validation Manual. Washing- ton, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Traffic Safety Administration. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/FARS02CVMAN.PDF (accessed Aug 2009). National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration. August 2008. “Traffic Safety Facts 2007.” DOT HS 811 017. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic and Safety Administra- tion. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811017.pdf (accessed Aug 2009). National Transportation Safety Board. 2002. Safety Report: Transportation Safety Databases. NTSB/SR-02/02. Washington D.C.: National Transportation Safety Board. National Transportation Safety Board. July 1998. Safety Study, Safety at Passive Grade Crossings. NTSB/SS-98/02 Vol 1 and 2. Washington D.C.: National Transportation Safety Board. Paulsson, R. 2005. Deliverable 5.2: In-Depth Accident Causation Data Study Methodology Development Report (SafetyNet). Brussels: European Commission. http://www.erso.eu/safetynet/fixed/WP5/SN_Deliverable_ 5%202%20v3_051123_Final%20submission.pdf. Scopatz, Robert A. 2006. Illinois Department of Transportation Crash Data Process Audit. College Station, TX: Data Nexus, Inc. http://www.dot.state.il.us/trafficsafety/ITRCC/Illinois%20Crash%20Data%20Processes_ 04102006.pdf. Scopatz, Robert A. 2001. “Crashes Involving Long Combination Vehicles: Data Quality Problems and Rec- ommendations for Improvement.” Transportation Research Record 1779, pp. 162–172. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Shappell, S. A. and D. A. Wiegmann. 2000. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System—HFACS. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Shupe Consulting. 2001. Unified Reporting of Commercial and Non-Commercial Traffic Accidents. No. SD2000- 14-F. Pierre, SD: South Dakota Department of Transportation. Transportation Research Board. 1981. Transportation Research Circular 231: Truck Accident Data Systems: State- of-the-Art Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Vogt, A. and J. G. Bared. 1998. Accident Models for Two-Lane Rural Roads: Segments and Intersections. Report No. FHWA-RD-98-133. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. References 111

Next: Appendices »
Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program (HMCRP) Report 1: Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis examines potential technical improvements to hazardous materials accident databases that are collected and managed by various agencies. The report explores gaps and redundancies in reporting requirements and attempts to estimate the extent of the under-reporting of serious incidents.

Appendixes A through E to HMCRP 1 are available online.

Appendix A: Questionnaires

Appendix B: Questionnaire Results for Carriers and Database Administrators

Appendix C: Brief Summary of the 2005 MCMIS Crash Records

Appendix D: The Percent of Missing Data for Variables from TIFA/FARS, 1999–2004

Appendix E: Selected Analyses Performed with the Hazmat Accident Database

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!