National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

HMCRP Report 1: Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis (2009)
Hazardous Material Cooperative Research Program (HMCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "4.4.10 Data Uses." HMCRP Report 1: Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
72
bottomleft bottomright
Page
72
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-8)
1.1 Project Purpose (9-9)
1.2.1 Literature Review (10-10)
1.2.3 Analysis of Databases (11-11)
1.3 Effective Methods to Ensure High-Quality Data (12-12)
1.4 Potential Measures to Enhance the Ability of Databases to Identify the Root Causes of Hazmat Crashes (13-13)
2.2.1 Rail Equipment - Train Accident Data (14-14)
2.2.2 Project 5 Overview - Developing Common Data on Accident Circumstances (15-15)
2.2.4 Transportation Research Circular 231: Truck Accident Data Systems: State-of-the-Art Report (16-16)
2.2.6 The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System - HFACS (17-17)
2.2.9 Highway Safety: Further Opportunities Exist to Improve Data on Crashes Involving Commercial Motor Vehicles (18-18)
2.2.11 Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010: 2006 Listening Session (19-19)
2.2.16 Hazardous Materials Serious Crash Analysis: Phase 2 (20-20)
2.3 Summary of Findings and Implications (21-21)
2.3.2 Solutions Being Implemented or Under Consideration (22-22)
3.1 Introduction (23-23)
3.2 Summary of Responses from Carriers (24-24)
3.2.1 Carrier Satisfaction with HMIRS (25-25)
3.3.1 Shipper 1 (26-26)
3.3.2 Shipper 2 (27-27)
3.4.1 Interviews with Agencies Maintaining Databases (PHMSA) (28-28)
3.4.2 Interviews with Agencies Maintaining Databases (FMCSA) (29-29)
3.4.3 Interviews with Agencies Maintaining Databases (FRA) (30-30)
3.5 Summary of Findings from Interviews (31-31)
4.1.1 MCMIS Database Description (32-32)
4.1.3 Database Format (33-33)
4.1.6 Types of Fields Covered (34-34)
4.1.7 Database Purpose and Function (35-35)
4.1.10 Accuracy and Completeness of Data (36-36)
4.1.11 Identification of Hazmat Incidents in MCMIS (37-41)
4.1.12 Quality Control Process (42-42)
4.1.13 Interconnectivity with Other Databases (43-43)
4.1.14 Analyses Using Database (44-44)
4.1.15 Summary and Potential Measures for Improving Root Cause Analysis (45-45)
4.2 Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) (46-46)
4.2.1 Database Description (47-48)
4.2.3 Data Collection (49-49)
4.2.5 Accuracy and Completeness of Data (50-53)
4.2.8 Analyses Using Database (54-59)
4.2.9 Summary and Potential Measures for Improving Root Cause Analysis (60-60)
4.3 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (61-61)
4.3.4 Types of Hazmat Data Included (62-62)
4.3.6 Data Quality (63-63)
4.3.7 Additional Fields (64-64)
4.3.9 Compatibility with Other Databases (65-65)
4.4.4 Types of Hazmat Data Included (66-66)
4.4.5 Usefulness of the Data for Determining Root Causes (67-70)
4.4.7 Additional Fields (71-71)
4.4.10 Data Uses (72-72)
4.5.1 Database Description (73-73)
4.5.3 Data Collection (74-74)
4.5.7 Interconnectivity with Other Databases (75-75)
4.5.8 Analyses Using Database (76-77)
4.5.9 Summary and Potential Measures to Improve Root Cause Analysis (78-78)
4.6 Railroad Accident/Incident Reporting System (RAIRS) (79-79)
4.6.1 Track, Roadbed, and Structures (80-80)
4.6.3 Mechanical and Electrical Failures (81-81)
4.6.5 Summary of Causes and Impact (82-83)
4.7.3 Data Collection (84-84)
4.7.5 Accuracy and Completeness (85-85)
4.8.1 Scope of Investigations (86-86)
4.8.2 Approach to Identifying Root Causes (87-87)
4.8.4 Data Quality (88-88)
4.8.5 Probable Cause Findings (89-89)
4.8.6 Summary (90-90)
4.9.1 Introduction (91-91)
4.9.4 Populating Records and Improving Data Quality (92-92)
4.9.6 Database Enhancements and Limitations (93-93)
4.9.7 Summary (94-94)
5.2 Information System Development (95-95)
5.2.1 Develop Framework for Identifying Contributing Causes and Root Causes of Hazardous Material Accidents (96-96)
5.2.3 Add or Modify Inventory Data in Databases (97-97)
5.2.5 Develop a System for Each Database That Will Target About 5% of Hazmat Crashes for More Detailed Investigation (98-98)
5.3.2 Complete Values for All Parameters (99-102)
5.4.1 Potential Measures for MCMIS (103-104)
5.4.2 Potential Measures for HMIRS (105-106)
5.4.3 Potential Measures for TIFA (107-107)
5.4.4 Potential Measures for RAIRS (108-108)
5.6 Follow-On Project (109-109)
References (110-111)
Appendices (112-112)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (113-113)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 72
72 Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis crash causation. Some data fields could be added very easily, with little modification of the program. Including other data fields would take additional resources. Recommended additional fields are as follows: · The right-of-way data element could identify which vehicle, if any, within a crash had the right of way prior to the collision. This could be coded readily from the PAR in almost all cases. Some state crash reports include right of way on the report. Right of way would be useful in most crashes in identifying the vehicle that primarily contributed to the crash. · Critical event is a field that identifies and describes the event that precipitated the crash for the vehicle. This field is included in both the GES and CDS files. Coding manuals are available and could be used to ensure that coding is consistent with NCSA standards. · The managers of the TIFA survey might also consider adding a field for critical reason. Criti- cal reason captures the "reason" for the critical event, classified broadly as driver, vehicle, or environment, with detailed levels under each. The variable is useful for identifying the imme- diate failure that led to the crash and would shed light on crash causation. The field was used in the Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS), conducted jointly by FMCSA and NHTSA, and in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS), conducted by NHTSA. Therefore, coding procedures are available. The suggestion to add a critical rea- son data field to TIFA, however, is subject to whether the information is available within the TIFA protocol, which relies primarily on PARs, to code this field. The TIFA program could add the following additional information about hazmat cargo: · MC number of the cargo tank, which has been collected in the past as part of a special data col- lection effort and, therefore, the feasibility of collecting this information has been demonstrated. · Quantity of hazardous material transported, which would entail adding cargo weight data fields back to the survey. The program could consider capturing the quantity in terms of liquid measure, where appropriate. 4.4.8 Potential Measures to Improve Data Quality The TIFA system is complete and mature. It is subject to annual review and adjustment, including continuing training of the coders. However, greater cooperation with the FARS pro- gram might help increase the accuracy with which trucks are identified. 4.4.9 Compatibility with Other Databases The comments in Section 4.3.9 on the FARS data apply equally to TIFA, since TIFA uses the same case number system. However, there is an additional constraint on linking the TIFA file to other data systems, if that raises a risk of identifying specific individuals or organizations. The TIFA program is bound by commitments to respondents to protect their identity, and by the terms of its operations under the University of Michigan's Institutional Review Board (IRB). Thus, any effort to link the data to other data systems would be unlikely to be allowed. 4.4.10 Data Uses FMCSA uses TIFA data for a variety of research purposes. In addition, the TIFA data are used by researchers at UMTRI and other universities for traffic safety research. The research is designed to identify the scope of traffic safety problems related to trucks and to identify risk fac- tors in truck crashes, whether related to the vehicle, driver, operation, or environment. This information is used by government entities--including FMCSA, NHTSA, and certain states-- for regulatory purposes.