National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations (2010)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Woodward, Jon M, Briscoe, Lisa Lassman, Dunholter, Paul, Transportation Research Board. "Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach." ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
11
bottomleft bottomright
Page
11
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Guidebook Summary (1-1)
How to Use the Guidebook (2-2)
The Relationship Between Environmental Planning for Airports and General Community Response Factors (3-3)
Culture Shift Required (4-5)
Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills) (6-6)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise (7-7)
Best Practices for Managing Noise Compatibility Issues (8-9)
Legal/Administrative Requirements for Public Contact (10-10)
Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach (11-11)
Potential Communication Objectives (12-12)
Example Evaluation Questions (13-13)
What Does the Public Really Want? (14-14)
Introduction (15-15)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (16-16)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (17-26)
Self-Assessment Tool (27-27)
How to Use the Self-Assessment Tool (28-31)
Implementation Steps Matrix (32-32)
How to Use the Implementation Steps Matrix (33-35)
Community Engagement Techniques and Tools (36-36)
Community Involvement Manuals (37-37)
Communications Checklists (38-39)
Checklists For Meeting Preparation and Meeting Announcements (40-40)
Brochures (41-42)
Fact Sheets (43-43)
Flyers or Posters (44-44)
Newsletters (45-45)
Frequently Asked Questions (46-46)
Annual Reports and Noise Program Overviews (47-48)
Multimedia Presentations (49-50)
Websites (51-51)
Interactive Learning Tool (52-53)
Advanced Technology Demonstrations (54-54)
Outreach Vehicle Tools (55-55)
Airport and Peer Industry Literature Review (56-56)
Airport Case Studies (57-57)
University Case Study (58-58)
Best Practices in the Airport Industry: An Assessment of Airport Community Involvement Efforts (59-60)
Best Practices in the Transportation Industry: Transportation Research Board White Paper (61-61)
What is Good Practice? (62-62)
Challenges to Practitioners: Areas for Development (63-63)
Conclusions (64-64)
Study Findings (65-66)
Large/Medium-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - San Francisco International Airport (SFO) (67-69)
Small/Non-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - Long Beach Airport (LGB) (70-72)
Cargo Hub Airport - Louisville International Airport/Standiford Field (SDF) (73-75)
Large General Aviation/Reliever Airport - Van Nuys Airport (VNY) (76-79)
Smaller General Aviation Airport - Ohio State University Airport (OSU) (80-81)
Education Industry - Crisis in the College/University Relationship with the Community: A Case Study (14) (82-84)
Conclusions (85-86)
Chapter 6 - Noise Management and Public Response (87-87)
Congressional and Federal Regulatory Actions (88-89)
FAA Orders and Guidance on Environmental Planning (90-90)
State and Local Action (91-91)
Airport Role in Comprehensive Planning (92-92)
Stakeholder Involvement and Jurisdictional Coordination (93-93)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise Levels (94-94)
Thresholds of Significant Noise (95-99)
Difference Between Compatible and Incompatible (Noise-Sensitive) Land Uses (100-100)
Differences within the FAA Divisions Regarding Thresholds of Noise Level Evaluation (60/65 DNL in Airports vs. 45/60/65 DNL in Air Traffic) (101-101)
Precedence of Federal and State/Local Standards and When Applicable (102-103)
Measured versus Computer-Modeled Noise Levels (104-104)
Sound Insulation Programs for Noise Abatement (105-106)
Difference between Interior and Exterior Sound Levels and Methods to Abate Each (107-107)
Contour and Impact Area Change Over Time and the Differences Between Federal and Local Response to Change (108-108)
Self Assessment Tools for Noise Management Programs (109-109)
Evaluation Checklist for Airports with Established Noise Programs (110-110)
Chapter 7 - Noise Metrics and Community Response (111-111)
Cumulative Noise Metrics (112-112)
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) (113-113)
Sound Exposure Level (SEL) (114-114)
Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) (115-115)
Number of Events Above (NA) (116-116)
Time Above (117-117)
Best Applications (118-118)
Noise Complaint Characteristics (119-121)
Preferential Runway Use Program (122-122)
Flight Track Modifications to Fly Over Compatible Uses (123-123)
Approach Thrust and Flap Management Procedures (124-124)
Restrict Ground Run-up Activity (125-125)
Displaced Threshold - Landings (126-126)
High Speed Exit Taxiways (127-127)
Enhanced Navigational Aids (128-128)
Airport Access Restrictions (129-130)
Best Practices (131-132)
Chapter 9 - Land Use Management Techniques for Noise Abatement (133-133)
Purchase of Non-Compatible Land (134-134)
Waiver of Claim (135-135)
Purchase Assurance/Sales Assistance (136-136)
Comprehensive Community Planning (137-137)
Noise Impact Overlay Zoning (138-138)
Dedication of Noise and Overflight Easements (139-139)
Development Density Restrictions in High Noise Areas (140-140)
Building Code Modifications (141-141)
Best Practices in Land Use Management for Noise Compatibility (142-143)
References (144-151)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (152-152)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 11
Need for Building Relationships 11 Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach During recent decades, there has been a shift toward greater public involvement and an increasing expectation on the part of the public that they have a right to be heard and treated as partners in the decision-making process. Because the public is so well-informed and involved in many areas, organizations and institutions that the public perceives as being public assets are finding that developing a customer service/public service attitude is critical to the success of their mission. A university example, detailed in the University of Missouri at Kansas City Case Study (14) presented in Chapter 5 of this Guidebook, describes how a university's development plans were threatened because of their assumption of total autonomy. They believed they had no need to do more than inform the public. After facing a very angry and well-organized public, the univer- sity decided that involvement and good two-way communication was the key to increased com- munity approval and support. The project incurred months of delays as the university fought to overcome its own mistakes made early in the public review process by establishing better com- munity relations. Other institutions such as state departments of transportation and the EPA are moving in a similar direction. What does having a public service attitude mean? A customer or public service attitude means that every individual in the organization must relate to the public as if every member of the pub- lic were contributing to their paycheck, because directly or indirectly they do. Many airports inter- viewed confirmed the need for a customer service attitude. Engagement creates opportunities to deliver improved recommendations. It establishes a more consistent framework for both airport staff and policy makers to make more informed decisions about important issues. It fosters enthusiasm and excitement about best planning practices, and involves the public in important policy considerations. Engagement advances the airport staff's credibility and contributes to an atmosphere of trust. The public feels more like they are part of the solution, rather than pawns being manipulated through a jaded set of procedures. As airport planners and managers engage a community, their capacities for brainstorming and knowledge are extended, and they grow as public servants.