Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 116
116 Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations Slant Range Distance/Altitude Another factor frequently cited by the public as a noise issue is the distance from the aircraft in flight to the listener on the ground (the slant/range distance) or the aircraft's altitude. The slant/range distance represents the hypotenuse of a triangle formed by the aircraft altitude and the lateral distance from the ground location to the point of closest approach along an aircraft's path of flight. Noise complaints recorded by those airports surveyed for this evaluation cited "too low" as a common source of public concern. Similarly, the public will often be aware of preferred flight patterns and complain that the air- craft was "right over my house" and frequently point to a location halfway above the horizon instead of straight up. The perception of location, coupled with distance, is often difficult to answer without the use of triangulation. An aircraft 45 degrees above the horizon is as far away horizontally as it is vertically and farther than either when measured in a straight line distance. Members of the public often are interested in the number of events that overfly an area at dif- ferent altitudes and may request that altitudes be raised to abate noise. As the distance between the noise source and the receiver is increased, the noise level will decrease by six decibels with every doubling of distance. Consequently, a noise event of 80 dBA of SEL at 3,000 feet overhead will be decreased to 74 dBA of SEL if the altitude of the aircraft is increased to 6,000 feet. It is often very difficult to increase aircraft altitudes by significant amounts at any course along a flight track without adding substantial length to the track prior to passing over, or in some cases, with- out significantly increasing the power setting used in flight (and the resulting noise level). However, if the same flight track were relocated laterally by one mile, the noise reduction would be the same because the distance between the source and the receiver would be increased to 6,000 feet. It is often much easier to relocate a flight track than to increase altitude enough to achieve a meaningful reduction in single event noise levels. Hybrid Metrics As information has become more available for individual aircraft types, as noise prediction tools have been improved, and as the public has become more sophisticated in their understand- ing of the effects and consequences of aircraft development actions, new applications of avail- able metrics have evolved to be more responsive to public interests. Several supplemental metrics have evolved in recent years that allow the noise analyst to develop information that may be more meaningful to members of the public in their understanding of aviation noise. While such sup- plemental metrics are not required for inclusion in any environmental evaluation, their avail- ability is well known and often advisable at locations where noise is a contentious issue. These metrics are typically formed from combinations of simpler single event metrics. Because they are developed from more detailed computer modeling and post-processing requirements than the more standard metrics described in earlier sections, they are more costly to produce. They include Number of Events Above, Time Above, and Audibility. Number of Events Above (NA) In recent years, the Number of Events Above metric has become popular as a means of com- paring the number of operations above various thresholds of loudness associated with opera- tional alternatives. The INM is capable of computing the SEL or Lmax of every operation that is included in its input data, at any location selected by the program's user. The availability of this information will allow the noise analyst to sort output data to provide the numbers of daily operations that exceed selected noise thresholds. For example, the number of flights exceed-