National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations (2010)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Woodward, Jon M, Briscoe, Lisa Lassman, Dunholter, Paul, Transportation Research Board. "Preferential Runway Use Program." ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
122
bottomleft bottomright
Page
122
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Guidebook Summary (1-1)
How to Use the Guidebook (2-2)
The Relationship Between Environmental Planning for Airports and General Community Response Factors (3-3)
Culture Shift Required (4-5)
Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills) (6-6)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise (7-7)
Best Practices for Managing Noise Compatibility Issues (8-9)
Legal/Administrative Requirements for Public Contact (10-10)
Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach (11-11)
Potential Communication Objectives (12-12)
Example Evaluation Questions (13-13)
What Does the Public Really Want? (14-14)
Introduction (15-15)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (16-16)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (17-26)
Self-Assessment Tool (27-27)
How to Use the Self-Assessment Tool (28-31)
Implementation Steps Matrix (32-32)
How to Use the Implementation Steps Matrix (33-35)
Community Engagement Techniques and Tools (36-36)
Community Involvement Manuals (37-37)
Communications Checklists (38-39)
Checklists For Meeting Preparation and Meeting Announcements (40-40)
Brochures (41-42)
Fact Sheets (43-43)
Flyers or Posters (44-44)
Newsletters (45-45)
Frequently Asked Questions (46-46)
Annual Reports and Noise Program Overviews (47-48)
Multimedia Presentations (49-50)
Websites (51-51)
Interactive Learning Tool (52-53)
Advanced Technology Demonstrations (54-54)
Outreach Vehicle Tools (55-55)
Airport and Peer Industry Literature Review (56-56)
Airport Case Studies (57-57)
University Case Study (58-58)
Best Practices in the Airport Industry: An Assessment of Airport Community Involvement Efforts (59-60)
Best Practices in the Transportation Industry: Transportation Research Board White Paper (61-61)
What is Good Practice? (62-62)
Challenges to Practitioners: Areas for Development (63-63)
Conclusions (64-64)
Study Findings (65-66)
Large/Medium-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - San Francisco International Airport (SFO) (67-69)
Small/Non-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - Long Beach Airport (LGB) (70-72)
Cargo Hub Airport - Louisville International Airport/Standiford Field (SDF) (73-75)
Large General Aviation/Reliever Airport - Van Nuys Airport (VNY) (76-79)
Smaller General Aviation Airport - Ohio State University Airport (OSU) (80-81)
Education Industry - Crisis in the College/University Relationship with the Community: A Case Study (14) (82-84)
Conclusions (85-86)
Chapter 6 - Noise Management and Public Response (87-87)
Congressional and Federal Regulatory Actions (88-89)
FAA Orders and Guidance on Environmental Planning (90-90)
State and Local Action (91-91)
Airport Role in Comprehensive Planning (92-92)
Stakeholder Involvement and Jurisdictional Coordination (93-93)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise Levels (94-94)
Thresholds of Significant Noise (95-99)
Difference Between Compatible and Incompatible (Noise-Sensitive) Land Uses (100-100)
Differences within the FAA Divisions Regarding Thresholds of Noise Level Evaluation (60/65 DNL in Airports vs. 45/60/65 DNL in Air Traffic) (101-101)
Precedence of Federal and State/Local Standards and When Applicable (102-103)
Measured versus Computer-Modeled Noise Levels (104-104)
Sound Insulation Programs for Noise Abatement (105-106)
Difference between Interior and Exterior Sound Levels and Methods to Abate Each (107-107)
Contour and Impact Area Change Over Time and the Differences Between Federal and Local Response to Change (108-108)
Self Assessment Tools for Noise Management Programs (109-109)
Evaluation Checklist for Airports with Established Noise Programs (110-110)
Chapter 7 - Noise Metrics and Community Response (111-111)
Cumulative Noise Metrics (112-112)
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) (113-113)
Sound Exposure Level (SEL) (114-114)
Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) (115-115)
Number of Events Above (NA) (116-116)
Time Above (117-117)
Best Applications (118-118)
Noise Complaint Characteristics (119-121)
Preferential Runway Use Program (122-122)
Flight Track Modifications to Fly Over Compatible Uses (123-123)
Approach Thrust and Flap Management Procedures (124-124)
Restrict Ground Run-up Activity (125-125)
Displaced Threshold - Landings (126-126)
High Speed Exit Taxiways (127-127)
Enhanced Navigational Aids (128-128)
Airport Access Restrictions (129-130)
Best Practices (131-132)
Chapter 9 - Land Use Management Techniques for Noise Abatement (133-133)
Purchase of Non-Compatible Land (134-134)
Waiver of Claim (135-135)
Purchase Assurance/Sales Assistance (136-136)
Comprehensive Community Planning (137-137)
Noise Impact Overlay Zoning (138-138)
Dedication of Noise and Overflight Easements (139-139)
Development Density Restrictions in High Noise Areas (140-140)
Building Code Modifications (141-141)
Best Practices in Land Use Management for Noise Compatibility (142-143)
References (144-151)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (152-152)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 122
122 Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations The subsequent paragraphs provide a short definition of the purpose of each measure, the lim- itations to its implementation, the parties responsible for its implementation and management, the general public reaction to its use and the sources of additional information about its appli- cation. Examples of how the action may be displayed to explain its effects to a public audience is provided for the most effective of these techniques. Flight Management Techniques To abate the noise of aircraft in flight, the following techniques have been used at airports across the United States in efforts to seek relief for those affected. Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Purpose: An automated arrival procedure designed to reduce noise impacts on communities located under the approach path to a runway. The procedure is designed for aircraft to utilize a continuous descent of aircraft on a gradual slope while idling without the deployment of flaps and landing gear to reduce airframe noise. Procedure provides benefit to communities located 7-15 miles from airport and reduces fuel burn where approaching aircraft will typically fly level segments of their arrivals to sequence into the air traffic flows. These level flights may result in higher noise levels as aircraft use more thrust to remain level and have gear and/or flaps extended to maintain slow speeds. The CDA technology is new and has been implemented only at Louisville, KY, and London Heathrow Airports. CDAs are in development at several other air- ports, including Atlanta Hartsfield, Mather Field, and Los Angeles International. Limitations: CDA requires extensive research and coordination in the development of the descent profile. Procedures are designed for one or more runway ends, but usually both. It has not yet been shown to work well in environments exposed to conflicts between arriving and departing traffic, nor during peak operating periods. Procedure works very well in single operation, off-peak periods when properly designed. Implemented by: Airlines/operators with guidance from the FAA Air Traffic and Flight Standards. Airports may seek their approval if believed to be a desirable noise abatement action. Public reaction: Public experiences lesser noise levels along the full course of the approach through the absence of thrust adjustments required to maintain episodes of periodic level flight. Reaction to date on this relatively new procedure has been generally positive. The investigation of CDAs is one of the PARTNER projects undertaken by the FAA/NASA/ Transort Canada sponsored Center of Excellence. Additional information about CDAs may be found at: http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/partner/projects/project4.html (164). Preferential Runway Use Program Purpose: This is an airport-initiated program that delineates selection procedures for the use of each runway at an airport. The runway use program can be either informal (voluntary) or for- mal (mandatory). These programs attempt to manage the number of aircraft that fly over areas along the approach and departure routes leading to or from each runway end. By doing so, the programs manage the overall noise energy present, over time, in those areas. To be effective for noise abatement, they should always be indexed to the population overflown or incorporate techniques to provide relief and respite to those persons under the preferential routes of flight. Limitations: Preferential runway use programs are driven by wind availability. When wind conditions are favorable (up to a five knot tail wind component) and runway length is adequate