National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations (2010)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Woodward, Jon M, Briscoe, Lisa Lassman, Dunholter, Paul, Transportation Research Board. "Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills)." ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
6
bottomleft bottomright
Page
6
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Guidebook Summary (1-1)
How to Use the Guidebook (2-2)
The Relationship Between Environmental Planning for Airports and General Community Response Factors (3-3)
Culture Shift Required (4-5)
Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills) (6-6)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise (7-7)
Best Practices for Managing Noise Compatibility Issues (8-9)
Legal/Administrative Requirements for Public Contact (10-10)
Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach (11-11)
Potential Communication Objectives (12-12)
Example Evaluation Questions (13-13)
What Does the Public Really Want? (14-14)
Introduction (15-15)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (16-16)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (17-26)
Self-Assessment Tool (27-27)
How to Use the Self-Assessment Tool (28-31)
Implementation Steps Matrix (32-32)
How to Use the Implementation Steps Matrix (33-35)
Community Engagement Techniques and Tools (36-36)
Community Involvement Manuals (37-37)
Communications Checklists (38-39)
Checklists For Meeting Preparation and Meeting Announcements (40-40)
Brochures (41-42)
Fact Sheets (43-43)
Flyers or Posters (44-44)
Newsletters (45-45)
Frequently Asked Questions (46-46)
Annual Reports and Noise Program Overviews (47-48)
Multimedia Presentations (49-50)
Websites (51-51)
Interactive Learning Tool (52-53)
Advanced Technology Demonstrations (54-54)
Outreach Vehicle Tools (55-55)
Airport and Peer Industry Literature Review (56-56)
Airport Case Studies (57-57)
University Case Study (58-58)
Best Practices in the Airport Industry: An Assessment of Airport Community Involvement Efforts (59-60)
Best Practices in the Transportation Industry: Transportation Research Board White Paper (61-61)
What is Good Practice? (62-62)
Challenges to Practitioners: Areas for Development (63-63)
Conclusions (64-64)
Study Findings (65-66)
Large/Medium-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - San Francisco International Airport (SFO) (67-69)
Small/Non-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - Long Beach Airport (LGB) (70-72)
Cargo Hub Airport - Louisville International Airport/Standiford Field (SDF) (73-75)
Large General Aviation/Reliever Airport - Van Nuys Airport (VNY) (76-79)
Smaller General Aviation Airport - Ohio State University Airport (OSU) (80-81)
Education Industry - Crisis in the College/University Relationship with the Community: A Case Study (14) (82-84)
Conclusions (85-86)
Chapter 6 - Noise Management and Public Response (87-87)
Congressional and Federal Regulatory Actions (88-89)
FAA Orders and Guidance on Environmental Planning (90-90)
State and Local Action (91-91)
Airport Role in Comprehensive Planning (92-92)
Stakeholder Involvement and Jurisdictional Coordination (93-93)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise Levels (94-94)
Thresholds of Significant Noise (95-99)
Difference Between Compatible and Incompatible (Noise-Sensitive) Land Uses (100-100)
Differences within the FAA Divisions Regarding Thresholds of Noise Level Evaluation (60/65 DNL in Airports vs. 45/60/65 DNL in Air Traffic) (101-101)
Precedence of Federal and State/Local Standards and When Applicable (102-103)
Measured versus Computer-Modeled Noise Levels (104-104)
Sound Insulation Programs for Noise Abatement (105-106)
Difference between Interior and Exterior Sound Levels and Methods to Abate Each (107-107)
Contour and Impact Area Change Over Time and the Differences Between Federal and Local Response to Change (108-108)
Self Assessment Tools for Noise Management Programs (109-109)
Evaluation Checklist for Airports with Established Noise Programs (110-110)
Chapter 7 - Noise Metrics and Community Response (111-111)
Cumulative Noise Metrics (112-112)
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) (113-113)
Sound Exposure Level (SEL) (114-114)
Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) (115-115)
Number of Events Above (NA) (116-116)
Time Above (117-117)
Best Applications (118-118)
Noise Complaint Characteristics (119-121)
Preferential Runway Use Program (122-122)
Flight Track Modifications to Fly Over Compatible Uses (123-123)
Approach Thrust and Flap Management Procedures (124-124)
Restrict Ground Run-up Activity (125-125)
Displaced Threshold - Landings (126-126)
High Speed Exit Taxiways (127-127)
Enhanced Navigational Aids (128-128)
Airport Access Restrictions (129-130)
Best Practices (131-132)
Chapter 9 - Land Use Management Techniques for Noise Abatement (133-133)
Purchase of Non-Compatible Land (134-134)
Waiver of Claim (135-135)
Purchase Assurance/Sales Assistance (136-136)
Comprehensive Community Planning (137-137)
Noise Impact Overlay Zoning (138-138)
Dedication of Noise and Overflight Easements (139-139)
Development Density Restrictions in High Noise Areas (140-140)
Building Code Modifications (141-141)
Best Practices in Land Use Management for Noise Compatibility (142-143)
References (144-151)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (152-152)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 6
6 Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations Best Practices in Achieving Effective Communications: 6 Keys Airport surveys, follow-up interviews, case studies, literature reviews, and professional experience were reviewed to identify the fundamental ideas that would help managers of air- ports of all sizes implement an effective noise communications approach. Managers may use these best practices to assess their own approach to communicating with the public about air- craft noise and determine where, or if, they could make changes that would improve public Airport Survey engagement. Comments Communication needs Build Trust Through "Good" Two-Way Communications to mean constructive involvement, not just a Trust and respect are the keys to a long-term relationship between the airport and commu- one-way thing. (LGB) nity groups. They require proactive involvement with the public and other interest groups using interactive techniques. Although the relationship may at times shift from collaborative to adver- sarial, efforts toward building trust and respect through engaged communications will ultimately result in an understanding of each parties position. A singular focus on educating the public will not build relationships, nor will it build trust. Regular attendance at Put Senior Leadership Out Front the Roundtable or Forum by the Airport When groups have something important at stake they look to an organization's leader for Director builds a cul- clues on its approach and as the ultimate authority on decisions and conflict resolution. Airport ture of the importance of noise abatement staff, user representatives, and the public will look to the words and attitudes expressed by the within the airport and senior airport management to guide their own attitudes and responses. The presence of airport encourages other upper level management brings other decision makers to the table, and can help in the resolu- important decision- tion of issues. makers like elected officials, tower repre- sentatives and users to Use Graphics to Illustrate the Message attend. (SFO) Advancements in computer software continue to allow visualization of real life and virtual Participation of the "What If" scenarios. A picture is worth a thousand words ­ and animated pictures may be Airport Director and worth a million in effectively explaining the concepts of aircraft noise to a non-technical pub- the FAA can be impor- tant at big public lic. Audiences seem to better understand concepts conveyed through visual presentations, and meetings because of factual data that illustrates issues through charts, graphs and video clips. With graphics, their authority and audiences tend to become more positively engaged with the presenter and the issues. expertise. People tend to believe them. (LGB) Highly visual Have a Transparent Process approaches that are Public mistrust of the airport and its motives is at the foundation of most airport conflicts. Con- interesting and color- ful are successful in sistent openness and truthfulness, demonstrated by telling people what is known, as soon as it can communications on be told, in a transparent planning process, builds lasting trust. the web and written materials. (SFO) Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills) Keep each other informed. Keep every- An emerging realization, strongly supported by airports that have successful public commu- body in the loop. Be nications programs, is that a "public service attitude" and "people skills" are equally important open as much as possi- to technical skills among noise staff members. Community interest groups strongly agree. Air- ble; tell them things if at all possible. (Boston ports with no noise staff must work to see that all employees who might respond to noise con- CAC) cerns are sensitive to the public relations aspects of the issue.