National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations (2010)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Woodward, Jon M, Briscoe, Lisa Lassman, Dunholter, Paul, Transportation Research Board. "State and Local Action." ACRP Report 15: Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
91
bottomleft bottomright
Page
91
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Guidebook Summary (1-1)
How to Use the Guidebook (2-2)
The Relationship Between Environmental Planning for Airports and General Community Response Factors (3-3)
Culture Shift Required (4-5)
Select Staff for Service-Oriented Attitude (People-Skills) (6-6)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise (7-7)
Best Practices for Managing Noise Compatibility Issues (8-9)
Legal/Administrative Requirements for Public Contact (10-10)
Shifting to a Public Service-Oriented Approach (11-11)
Potential Communication Objectives (12-12)
Example Evaluation Questions (13-13)
What Does the Public Really Want? (14-14)
Introduction (15-15)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (16-16)
Strategies for Successful Community Engagement (17-26)
Self-Assessment Tool (27-27)
How to Use the Self-Assessment Tool (28-31)
Implementation Steps Matrix (32-32)
How to Use the Implementation Steps Matrix (33-35)
Community Engagement Techniques and Tools (36-36)
Community Involvement Manuals (37-37)
Communications Checklists (38-39)
Checklists For Meeting Preparation and Meeting Announcements (40-40)
Brochures (41-42)
Fact Sheets (43-43)
Flyers or Posters (44-44)
Newsletters (45-45)
Frequently Asked Questions (46-46)
Annual Reports and Noise Program Overviews (47-48)
Multimedia Presentations (49-50)
Websites (51-51)
Interactive Learning Tool (52-53)
Advanced Technology Demonstrations (54-54)
Outreach Vehicle Tools (55-55)
Airport and Peer Industry Literature Review (56-56)
Airport Case Studies (57-57)
University Case Study (58-58)
Best Practices in the Airport Industry: An Assessment of Airport Community Involvement Efforts (59-60)
Best Practices in the Transportation Industry: Transportation Research Board White Paper (61-61)
What is Good Practice? (62-62)
Challenges to Practitioners: Areas for Development (63-63)
Conclusions (64-64)
Study Findings (65-66)
Large/Medium-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - San Francisco International Airport (SFO) (67-69)
Small/Non-Hub Airport with Passenger Service - Long Beach Airport (LGB) (70-72)
Cargo Hub Airport - Louisville International Airport/Standiford Field (SDF) (73-75)
Large General Aviation/Reliever Airport - Van Nuys Airport (VNY) (76-79)
Smaller General Aviation Airport - Ohio State University Airport (OSU) (80-81)
Education Industry - Crisis in the College/University Relationship with the Community: A Case Study (14) (82-84)
Conclusions (85-86)
Chapter 6 - Noise Management and Public Response (87-87)
Congressional and Federal Regulatory Actions (88-89)
FAA Orders and Guidance on Environmental Planning (90-90)
State and Local Action (91-91)
Airport Role in Comprehensive Planning (92-92)
Stakeholder Involvement and Jurisdictional Coordination (93-93)
Cumulative versus Single Event Noise Levels (94-94)
Thresholds of Significant Noise (95-99)
Difference Between Compatible and Incompatible (Noise-Sensitive) Land Uses (100-100)
Differences within the FAA Divisions Regarding Thresholds of Noise Level Evaluation (60/65 DNL in Airports vs. 45/60/65 DNL in Air Traffic) (101-101)
Precedence of Federal and State/Local Standards and When Applicable (102-103)
Measured versus Computer-Modeled Noise Levels (104-104)
Sound Insulation Programs for Noise Abatement (105-106)
Difference between Interior and Exterior Sound Levels and Methods to Abate Each (107-107)
Contour and Impact Area Change Over Time and the Differences Between Federal and Local Response to Change (108-108)
Self Assessment Tools for Noise Management Programs (109-109)
Evaluation Checklist for Airports with Established Noise Programs (110-110)
Chapter 7 - Noise Metrics and Community Response (111-111)
Cumulative Noise Metrics (112-112)
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) (113-113)
Sound Exposure Level (SEL) (114-114)
Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) (115-115)
Number of Events Above (NA) (116-116)
Time Above (117-117)
Best Applications (118-118)
Noise Complaint Characteristics (119-121)
Preferential Runway Use Program (122-122)
Flight Track Modifications to Fly Over Compatible Uses (123-123)
Approach Thrust and Flap Management Procedures (124-124)
Restrict Ground Run-up Activity (125-125)
Displaced Threshold - Landings (126-126)
High Speed Exit Taxiways (127-127)
Enhanced Navigational Aids (128-128)
Airport Access Restrictions (129-130)
Best Practices (131-132)
Chapter 9 - Land Use Management Techniques for Noise Abatement (133-133)
Purchase of Non-Compatible Land (134-134)
Waiver of Claim (135-135)
Purchase Assurance/Sales Assistance (136-136)
Comprehensive Community Planning (137-137)
Noise Impact Overlay Zoning (138-138)
Dedication of Noise and Overflight Easements (139-139)
Development Density Restrictions in High Noise Areas (140-140)
Building Code Modifications (141-141)
Best Practices in Land Use Management for Noise Compatibility (142-143)
References (144-151)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (152-152)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 91
Noise Management and Public Response 91 · Environmental Desk Reference (2007) (143) ­ The FAA released a reference document late during 2007 that was intended to provide applicable special purpose laws relating to envi- ronmental evaluations in a single location for FAA staff, airports, and preparers of environ- mental documentation. It presents the information based on the 23 environmental categories typically included in an Environmental Impact Statement by providing information in each of the following sections: 6-5 ­ Introduction and Definitions ­ Applicable Statutes and Implementing Laws or Regulations ­ Applicability to Airport Development Actions ­ Permits, Certifications, and Approvals ­ Environmental Compliance Procedures ­ Environmental Analysis ­ Determining Impacts ­ Determining Impact Significance ­ Environmental Impact Statement Content · The Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning process, has evolved over the years since its initiation, but the guidance document (FAA Advisory Circular 150-5020-1) (144) is outdated. An update is in preparation, with completion and release expected during 2008. The reader may find the documentation provided in the current Part 150 planning guidance of use. 6-6 · The 14 CFR Part 161, Notice and Approval of Airport Noise and Access Restrictions (138), requirements are often cited by the public as a mechanism for airports to implement curfews, noise level limitations, runway use requirements and similar actions as a means of abating noise in communities. The regulation is provided on the accompanying Toolkit. 6-7 State and Local Action Several states and communities have established environmental regulations similar to those enacted by the NEPA, for environmental review, or for land use management. For airports, these regulations are frequently focused on reporting the effects of current environmental conse- quences on surrounding communities. There may be differences between the standards adopted by the FAA in its Order 5040.4B regarding levels of significance, or there may be additional reporting required for airports within the state. Frequently, the anticipated future consequences of airport development projects must be reported against current conditions (under NEPA, future consequences are reported against future baseline conditions). Owing to the great diver- sity between state and local programs, the airport manager should establish contact with local legal advice and assistance of State aviation organizations to assure that state and local require- ments are met for the evaluation of aircraft noise. In general, courts have established federal preemption over state and local actions to restrict noise associated with aircraft in flight. The U.S. Supreme Court (City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal (1973) (441 U.S. 624, 93 S.Ct. 1854, 36 L.Ed.2d 547) (145) opened the door to the theory that communities cannot use police powers to control aircraft noise if the community is not the owner or operator of the airport. Further, the U.S. Court of Appeals found in Leudtke v. County of Milwaukee (1975) (7th Cir.; 521 F.2d 387) (146) that the airport and the airlines could not be held liable for violation of a state law if operations were con- ducted in compliance with federal laws and regulations (subsequently, the preemption of state-law relief was expressly overruled). Extensive additional information on these and similar cases, with an emphasis on federal and California litigation, may be found at http:// airportnoiselaw.org.