National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 15 - Conclusions
Page 158
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14340.
×
Page 158
Page 159
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2009. Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14340.
×
Page 159

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

158 1. FAA. Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2005. AC 150-5220-22a. 2. Cook, R. F. Soft-Ground Aircraft Arresting Systems, Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1987. FAA/ PM-87-27. 3. Cook, R. F. Evaluation of a Foam Arrestor Bed for Aircraft Safety Overrun Areas. Dayton: University of Dayton Research Institute, 1988. UDR-TR-88-07. 4. Bade, E., C. Eng, and E. M. Minter. Soft Ground Arresting of Civil Aircraft: Scaled Model VC 10 Tests in Gravel and Sintered Fuel Ash Pellets. Farnborough, UK: Royal Aircraft Establishment, 1971. RAE Technical Report 71015. 5. White, J. C. and S. K. Agrawal. Soft Ground Arresting System for Air- ports, Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Adminis- tration, 1993. CT-93-80. 6. Dole, G. R. “A Review of Computer Simulations for Aircraft-Surface Dynamics.” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1986, pp. 257–265. 7. Cook, R., C. A. Teubert, and G. Hayhoe. Soft Ground Arrestor De- sign Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1995. DOT/FAA/CT-95. 8. Heymsfield, E., W. M. Hale, and T. L. Halsey. A Parametric Sensi- tivity Analysis of Soft Ground Arrestor Systems. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007. 9. Stouffer, S. A Study of the Pressure and Moisture in the ESCO Ar- restor Bed at Minneapolis–St. Paul Airport. Dayton, OH: University of Dayton Research Institute, 2000. 10. Stehly, R. Report of Concrete Testing, Project: Engineered Material Arresting System Minneapolis–St. Paul Airport. American Engineer- ing Testing, Inc., 2007. 11. Zodiac ESCO. EMAS MAX: Preliminary Design Report for EMAS Systems at the Runway 14 and 32 Departure Ends at St. Paul Down- town Airport in St. Paul, Minnesota, Revision B 8-7-07. Logan Township, NJ: Zodiac ESCO, 2007. Revision B 8-7-07. 12. Minneapolis–St. Paul Airport. Minneapolis–St. Paul International Airport Certification Manual. Minneapolis–St. Paul, MN: 2004. pp. Section 11, 139.309 Safety Areas:11-1-11-5. 13. Rogers, C. Aggregate for Truck Arrestor Beds. Downsview, Ontario: Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, 2006. 14. Currey, N. Aircraft Landing Gear Design: Principles and Practices. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astro- nautics, Inc., 1988. 15. Pritchard, J. “Overview of Landing Gear Dynamics.” Journal of Air- craft, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2001, pp. 130–137. 16. Chester, D. H. “Aircraft Landing Impact Parametric Study with Emphasis on Nose Gear Landing Conditions.” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 394–403. 17. Micklos, R. P. and T. Defiore. Methods for Experimentally Deter- mining Commercial Jet Aircraft Landing Parameters From Video Image Data, Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993. DOT- FAA-CT-93-7. 18. Tipps, D. O. et al. Side Load Factor Statistics From Commercial Aircraft Ground Operations. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003. DOT/ FAA/AR-02/129. 19. FAA. Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. Washington, D.C.: Fed- eral Aviation Administration, 1993. CFR 14 Part 77. 20. FAA. Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving Certain Air Carriers. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1996. CFR 14 Part 139. 21. FAA. Runway Safety Area Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1999. Order 5200.8. 22. FAA. Runway Safety Area Status Database. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2007. 23. David, R. E. Location of Commercial Aircraft Accidents/Incidents Relative to Runways. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Admin- istration, 1990. DOT/FAA/AOV 90-1. 24. Hall, J., M. Ayres, Jr., D. Wong, A. Appleyard, M. Eddowes, H. Shi- razi, R. Speir, D. Pitfield, R. Caves, O. Selezneva, and T. Puzin. ACRP Report 3: Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council, 2008. 25. FAA. Introduction to Safety Management Systems (SMS) for Airport Operators. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2007. AC 150/5200-37. 26. NTSB. Report ATL06IA108. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- portation Safety Board, 2006. 27. NTSB. Report NYC03IA117. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- portation Safety Board, 2003. 28. NTSB. Report NYC99FA110. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- portation Safety Board, 2000. 29. Aeronautical Information Services. Find an Airport. AirportIQ 5010: Airport Master Records and Reports. http://www.gcr1.com/5010web/. 30. FAA. Financial Feasibility and Equivalency of Runway Safety Area Improvements and Engineered Material Arresting Systems. Washing- ton, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2004. Order 5200.9. References

31. San Filippo, W. K. and H. DeLong. Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS): An Alternative Solution to Runway Overruns. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2004. 32. Rastegar, J. S. and J. G. Qiaode. Roadway for Decelerating and/or Accelerating a Vehicle Including an Aircraft. U.S. Patent 6,969,213, 2005. 33. Barsotti, M. A. Optimization of a Passive Aircraft Arrestor with a Depth-Varying Crushable Material Using a Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Model. Graduate Thesis, University of Texas at San Antonio, 2008. 34. Angley, R. D. et al. Arresting Material Test Apparatus and Meth- ods. U.S. Patent 5,789,681, August 4, 1998. 35. Zodiac ESCO. EMAS: Design Report for Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood Airport R/W 9L. Logan Township, NJ: Zodiac ESCO, 2005. 36. Pittsburgh Corning. Brochure: FOAMGLAS Insulation. Pittsburgh Corning, 2005. Number FG-3 20M. Rev 11/05. 37. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Brochure: Glasopor, Konstruksjonspel- lets for framtiden, Produktinfo. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS, 2006. 38. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Glasopor Product Specification. 180107. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS, n.d. 39. Bell, N., Y. Yu, and P. J. Mucha. Particle-Based Simulation of Gran- ular Materials. Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, 2005. 40. Zodiac ESCO. Energy Absorbers. Zodiac ESCO. http://www.esco. zodiac.com/index.cfm/navid-30. Accessed July 1, 2009. 41. Zodiac ESCO. Barrier Nets. Zodiac ESCO. http://www.esco.zodiac. com/index.cfm/navid-98. Accessed July 1, 2009. 42. Boeing. 737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning. Renton, WA: The Boeing Company, 2005. 43. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Glasopor. http://www.glasopor.no. 44. FAA. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. Wash- ington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1997. CFR 14 Part 25. 45. Stapp, J. P. “Human Tolerance to Deceleration.” American Journal of Surgery, 93(4), April 1957, pp. 734–40. 46. Latham, F. “Linear Deceleration Studies and Human Tolerance.” Clin. Sci. (Lond.), 17(1), February 1958, pp. 121–35. 47. Lewis, S. T. and J. P. Stapp. “Human Tolerance to Aircraft Seat Belt Restraint.” J. Aviat. Med., 29(3), March 1958, pp. 187–96. 48. Hendler, E. “Linear Acceleration as a Survivable Hazard in Avia- tion.” J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 495–501. 49. DeWeese, R. L. and D. M. Moorcraft. Evaluation of a Head Injury Criteria Component Test Device. Washington, D.C.: Office of Aero- space Medicine, 2004. DOT/FAA/AM-04/18. 50. Moseley, H. G. and A. F. Zeller. “Relation of Injury to Forces and Direction of Deceleration in Aircraft Accidents.” J. Aviat. Med., 2(10), October 1958, pp. 739–49. 51. NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Occupant Crash Protection. Washington, D.C.: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Undated. 49 CFR Part 571.208. 52. FAA. Federal Aviation Regulation, Airworthiness Standards: Trans- port Category Airplanes. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Ad- ministration, Undated. CFR 14 Section 25.662. 53. Zuidema, G. D. et al. “Human Tolerance to Prolonged Accelera- tion.” J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 469–481. 54. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Ventricular Tachycardia. Medline Plus. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000187.htm. 55. Stapp, J. P. “Human Tolerance to Deceleration: Summary of 166 Runs.” J. Aviat. Med., 22(1), February 1951, pp. 42–5. 56. Stapp, J. P. “Effects of Mechanical Force on Living Tissue.” J. Aviat. Med., 26(4), August 1955, pp. 268–88. 57. Krishnamurthy, A. Current Concepts in Acceleration Physiology. India Society of Aerospace Medicine. www.isam-india.org. 58. Preston-Thomas, H. et al. “Human Tolerance to Multistage Rocket Acceleration Curves.” J. Aviat. Med., 26(5), October 1955, pp. 390–98. 59. Zuidema, G. D. et al. “Human Tolerance to Prolonged Acceleration.” J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 469–481. 60. Goodyear. Aircraft Tire Data Book. Akron, OH: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 2007. 61. Brockman, R. A. and W. R. Braisted. “Critical Speed Estimation for Aircraft Tires.” Tire Science and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1994, pp. 121–144. 62. Stander, N. and W. Roux. LS-OPT Training Class, Optimization and Robust Design Using LS-OPT and LS-DYNA. Detroit, MI: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2008. 63. Cook, R., C. A. Teubert, and G. Hayhoe. Soft Ground Arrestor Design Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1995. 159

Next: Appendix A - Bibliography »
Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report 29: Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems explores alternative materials that could be used for an engineered material arresting system (EMAS), as well as potential active arrestor designs for civil aircraft applications. The report examines cellular glass foam, aggregate foam, engineered aggregate, and a main-gear engagement active arrestor system.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!