Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 159

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 158
158 References 1. FAA. Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft 16. Chester, D. H. "Aircraft Landing Impact Parametric Study with Overruns. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, Emphasis on Nose Gear Landing Conditions." Journal of Aircraft, 2005. AC 150-5220-22a. Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 394403. 2. Cook, R. F. Soft-Ground Aircraft Arresting Systems, Final Report. 17. Micklos, R. P. and T. Defiore. Methods for Experimentally Deter- Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1987. FAA/ mining Commercial Jet Aircraft Landing Parameters From Video PM-87-27. Image Data, Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation 3. Cook, R. F. Evaluation of a Foam Arrestor Bed for Aircraft Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1993. DOT- Overrun Areas. Dayton: University of Dayton Research Institute, FAA-CT-93-7. 1988. UDR-TR-88-07. 18. Tipps, D. O. et al. Side Load Factor Statistics From Commercial 4. Bade, E., C. Eng, and E. M. Minter. Soft Ground Arresting of Civil Aircraft Ground Operations. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Aircraft: Scaled Model VC 10 Tests in Gravel and Sintered Fuel Ash Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003. DOT/ Pellets. Farnborough, UK: Royal Aircraft Establishment, 1971. RAE FAA/AR-02/129. Technical Report 71015. 19. FAA. Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. Washington, D.C.: Fed- 5. White, J. C. and S. K. Agrawal. Soft Ground Arresting System for Air- eral Aviation Administration, 1993. CFR 14 Part 77. ports, Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Adminis- 20. FAA. Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving Certain Air tration, 1993. CT-93-80. Carriers. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 6. Dole, G. R. "A Review of Computer Simulations for Aircraft-Surface 1996. CFR 14 Part 139. Dynamics." Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1986, pp. 257265. 21. FAA. Runway Safety Area Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal 7. Cook, R., C. A. Teubert, and G. Hayhoe. Soft Ground Arrestor De- Aviation Administration, 1999. Order 5200.8. sign Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 22. FAA. Runway Safety Area Status Database. Washington, D.C.: 1995. DOT/FAA/CT-95. Federal Aviation Administration, 2007. 8. Heymsfield, E., W. M. Hale, and T. L. Halsey. A Parametric Sensi- 23. David, R. E. Location of Commercial Aircraft Accidents/Incidents tivity Analysis of Soft Ground Arrestor Systems. American Society of Relative to Runways. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Admin- Civil Engineers, 2007. istration, 1990. DOT/FAA/AOV 90-1. 9. Stouffer, S. A Study of the Pressure and Moisture in the ESCO Ar- 24. Hall, J., M. Ayres, Jr., D. Wong, A. Appleyard, M. Eddowes, H. Shi- restor Bed at MinneapolisSt. Paul Airport. Dayton, OH: University of Dayton Research Institute, 2000. razi, R. Speir, D. Pitfield, R. Caves, O. Selezneva, and T. Puzin. 10. Stehly, R. Report of Concrete Testing, Project: Engineered Material ACRP Report 3: Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Arresting System MinneapolisSt. Paul Airport. American Engineer- Runway Safety Areas. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research ing Testing, Inc., 2007. Council, 2008. 11. Zodiac ESCO. EMAS MAX: Preliminary Design Report for EMAS 25. FAA. Introduction to Safety Management Systems (SMS) for Airport Systems at the Runway 14 and 32 Departure Ends at St. Paul Down- Operators. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, town Airport in St. Paul, Minnesota, Revision B 8-7-07. Logan 2007. AC 150/5200-37. Township, NJ: Zodiac ESCO, 2007. Revision B 8-7-07. 26. NTSB. Report ATL06IA108. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- 12. MinneapolisSt. Paul Airport. MinneapolisSt. Paul International portation Safety Board, 2006. Airport Certification Manual. MinneapolisSt. Paul, MN: 2004. 27. NTSB. Report NYC03IA117. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- pp. Section 11, 139.309 Safety Areas:11-1-11-5. portation Safety Board, 2003. 13. Rogers, C. Aggregate for Truck Arrestor Beds. Downsview, Ontario: 28. NTSB. Report NYC99FA110. Washington, D.C.: National Trans- Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, 2006. portation Safety Board, 2000. 14. Currey, N. Aircraft Landing Gear Design: Principles and Practices. 29. Aeronautical Information Services. Find an Airport. AirportIQ 5010: Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astro- Airport Master Records and Reports. nautics, Inc., 1988. 30. FAA. Financial Feasibility and Equivalency of Runway Safety Area 15. Pritchard, J. "Overview of Landing Gear Dynamics." Journal of Air- Improvements and Engineered Material Arresting Systems. Washing- craft, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2001, pp. 130137. ton, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2004. Order 5200.9.

OCR for page 158
159 31. San Filippo, W. K. and H. DeLong. Engineered Materials Arresting 48. Hendler, E. "Linear Acceleration as a Survivable Hazard in Avia- System (EMAS): An Alternative Solution to Runway Overruns. tion." J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 495501. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2004. 49. DeWeese, R. L. and D. M. Moorcraft. Evaluation of a Head Injury 32. Rastegar, J. S. and J. G. Qiaode. Roadway for Decelerating and/or Criteria Component Test Device. Washington, D.C.: Office of Aero- Accelerating a Vehicle Including an Aircraft. U.S. Patent 6,969,213, space Medicine, 2004. DOT/FAA/AM-04/18. 2005. 50. Moseley, H. G. and A. F. Zeller. "Relation of Injury to Forces and 33. Barsotti, M. A. Optimization of a Passive Aircraft Arrestor with a Direction of Deceleration in Aircraft Accidents." J. Aviat. Med., Depth-Varying Crushable Material Using a Smoothed Particle 2(10), October 1958, pp. 73949. Hydrodynamics (SPH) Model. Graduate Thesis, University of Texas 51. NHTSA. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Occupant Crash at San Antonio, 2008. Protection. Washington, D.C.: National Highway Transportation 34. Angley, R. D. et al. Arresting Material Test Apparatus and Meth- Safety Administration, Undated. 49 CFR Part 571.208. ods. U.S. Patent 5,789,681, August 4, 1998. 52. FAA. Federal Aviation Regulation, Airworthiness Standards: Trans- 35. Zodiac ESCO. EMAS: Design Report for Fort LauderdaleHollywood port Category Airplanes. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Ad- Airport R/W 9L. Logan Township, NJ: Zodiac ESCO, 2005. ministration, Undated. CFR 14 Section 25.662. 36. Pittsburgh Corning. Brochure: FOAMGLAS Insulation. Pittsburgh 53. Zuidema, G. D. et al. "Human Tolerance to Prolonged Accelera- Corning, 2005. Number FG-3 20M. Rev 11/05. tion." J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 469481. 37. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Brochure: Glasopor, Konstruksjonspel- 54. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Ventricular Tachycardia. Medline lets for framtiden, Produktinfo. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS, 2006. Plus. 38. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Glasopor Product Specification. 180107. 55. Stapp, J. P. "Human Tolerance to Deceleration: Summary of 166 Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS, n.d. Runs." J. Aviat. Med., 22(1), February 1951, pp. 425. 39. Bell, N., Y. Yu, and P. J. Mucha. Particle-Based Simulation of Gran- 56. Stapp, J. P. "Effects of Mechanical Force on Living Tissue." J. Aviat. ular Materials. Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Med., 26(4), August 1955, pp. 26888. Computer Animation, 2005. 57. Krishnamurthy, A. Current Concepts in Acceleration Physiology. 40. Zodiac ESCO. Energy Absorbers. Zodiac ESCO. http://www.esco. India Society of Aerospace Medicine. Accessed July 1, 2009. 58. Preston-Thomas, H. et al. "Human Tolerance to Multistage Rocket 41. Zodiac ESCO. Barrier Nets. Zodiac ESCO. http://www.esco.zodiac. Acceleration Curves." J. Aviat. Med., 26(5), October 1955, pp. 39098. com/index.cfm/navid-98. Accessed July 1, 2009. 59. Zuidema, G. D. et al. "Human Tolerance to Prolonged Acceleration." 42. Boeing. 737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning. Renton, J. Aviat. Med., 27(6), December 1956, pp. 469481. WA: The Boeing Company, 2005. 60. Goodyear. Aircraft Tire Data Book. Akron, OH: Goodyear Tire & 43. Norsk Glassgjenvinning AS. Glasopor. Rubber Company, 2007. 44. FAA. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. Wash- 61. Brockman, R. A. and W. R. Braisted. "Critical Speed Estimation for ington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1997. CFR 14 Part 25. Aircraft Tires." Tire Science and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1994, 45. Stapp, J. P. "Human Tolerance to Deceleration." American Journal pp. 121144. of Surgery, 93(4), April 1957, pp. 73440. 62. Stander, N. and W. Roux. LS-OPT Training Class, Optimization 46. Latham, F. "Linear Deceleration Studies and Human Tolerance." and Robust Design Using LS-OPT and LS-DYNA. Detroit, MI: Clin. Sci. (Lond.), 17(1), February 1958, pp. 12135. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2008. 47. Lewis, S. T. and J. P. Stapp. "Human Tolerance to Aircraft Seat Belt 63. Cook, R., C. A. Teubert, and G. Hayhoe. Soft Ground Arrestor Design Restraint." J. Aviat. Med., 29(3), March 1958, pp. 18796. Program. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1995.