National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 644: Guidelines for Conducting a Disparity and Availability Study for the Federal DBE Program (2010)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Wainwright, Jon, Holt, Colette, Transportation Research Board. "Cases (Alphabetical)." NCHRP Report 644: Guidelines for Conducting a Disparity and Availability Study for the Federal DBE Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
99
bottomleft bottomright
Page
99
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Strict Scrutiny Standard (1-1)
Strict Scrutiny as Applied to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (2-6)
Implications and Effects of Western States (7-7)
TRB Model Disparity Study Project (8-8)
Introduction (9-11)
Guidelines for Conducting Disparity and Availability Studies (12-15)
Review of Existing Studies (16-24)
Current State DOT Goal-Setting Methods (25-28)
Determination of Relevant Product Market (29-29)
Estimation of DBE Availability (30-47)
State DOT Disparity Analyses (48-50)
Anecdotal Analyses (51-53)
Management of the Study Process (54-54)
Collection of Subcontracting Data (55-55)
Multi-Jurisdiction Studies (56-56)
Model Study Scope of Work (57-57)
Tips for a Successful DBE Disparity or Availability Study RFP Process (58-59)
Non-DBE Subcontract Data Is Just as Important as DBE Subcontract Data (60-61)
Methods for Collecting Subcontract Data in Anticipation of Future Studies (62-62)
Methods for Addressing Missing Subcontract Data for Current Studies (63-64)
Strict Scrutiny Standard (68-78)
Strict Scrutiny as Applied to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (79-81)
State DOTs' Implementation of Part 26 Must be Narrowly Tailored (82-83)
Judicial Review of DBE Goal Setting Under Part 26 (84-87)
Additional Evidence of Discrimination (88-91)
Additional Elements of Narrowly Tailored DBE Goal Setting (92-93)
Implications of Western States (94-95)
Appendix D - Glossary (96-98)
Cases (Alphabetical) (99-99)
Cases (By Circuit) (100-100)
General References (101-101)
Disparity and Availability Studies (102-103)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (104-104)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 99
99 References Cases (Alphabetical) Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of Philadelphia, 6 F.3d 990 (3rd Cir. 1993) (Philadelphia II). Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peņa, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (Adarand III). Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of Philadelphia, Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peņa, 965 F. Supp. 1556 (D. Colo. 1997), 91 F.3d 586 (3rd Cir. 1996) (Philadelphia III). rev'd, 228 F.3d 1147 (2000) (Adarand IV). Coral Construction Co. v. King County, 941 F.2d. 910 (9th Cir. 1991). Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater, 228 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000), cert. Engineering Contractors Assoc. of South Florida, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade granted, 532 U.S. 941, then dismissed as improvidently granted, 534 County, 943 F.Supp. 1546 (S.D. Fla. 1996) (Engineering Contractors I). U.S. 103 (2001) (Adarand VII). Engineering Contractors Association of South Florida, Inc. v. Metro- Association for Fairness in Business, Inc. v. New Jersey, 82 F.Supp.2d 353 politan Dade County, 122 F.3d 895 (11th Cir. 1997) (Engineering (D. N.J. 2000). Contractors II). Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Columbus, 936 F. F. Buddie Contracting Ltd., v. Cuyahoga Community College District, Supp. 1363 (S.D. Ohio 1996). 31 F.Supp.2d. 571 (N.D. Oh. 1998). Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Coalition for Economic Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980). Equity, 950 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1991). Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003). Associated General Contractors of Connecticut v. City of New Haven, 791 Harrison & Burrowes Bridge Constructors, Inc. v. Cuomo, 981 F.2d 50 F.Supp. 941 (D. Conn. 1992). (2nd Cir. 1992). Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik, 50 F.Supp.2d 741 H. B. Rowe, Inc. v. Tippett, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100569 (E.D. N.C. (S.D. Ohio 1999) (Drabik I). 2008). Associated General Contractors of Ohio v. Drabik, 214 F.3d 730 (6th Cir. Hershell Gill Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, Florida, 2000) (Drabik II). 333 F.Supp.2d 1305 (S.D. Fla. 2004). Associated Utility Contractors of Maryland, Inc. v. Mayor and City Coun- Main Line Paving Co., Inc. v. Board of Education, 725 F.Supp. 1349 (E.D. cil of Baltimore, 83 F.Supp.2d 613 (D. Md. 2000) (Baltimore I). Penn. 1989). Associated Utility Contractors of Maryland, Inc. v. Mayor and City Coun- Maryland Troopers Association, Inc. v. Evans, 993 F.2d 1072, 1076­77 cil of Baltimore 218 F.Supp.2d 749 (D. Md. 2002) (Baltimore II). (4th Cir. 1993). Brunet v. City of Columbus, 1 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 1993), cert. denied sub Milwaukee County Pavers Ass'n v. Fiedler, 922 F.2d 419, 424 (7th Cir. nom Brunet v. Tucker, 510 U.S. 1164 (1994). 1991), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 954 (1991). Builders Association of Greater Chicago v. City of Chicago, 298 F. Supp.2d North Shore Concrete and Associates, Inc. v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. 725 (N.D. Ill. 2003). Dist. LEXIS 6785 (E.D. N.Y. 1998). Builders Association of Greater Chicago v. County of Cook, 123 F.Supp.2d Northeastern Florida Chapter of the AGC v. Jacksonville, 508 U.S. 656 1087 (N.D. Ill. 2000) (Cook I). (1993). Builders Association of Greater Chicago v. County of Cook, 256 F.3d 642 Northern Contracting, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Transportation, (7th Cir. 2001) (Cook II). 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, 3226 (N.D. Ill., Mar. 3, 2004) (Northern City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989). Contracting I). Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 823 Northern Contracting, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Transportation, 2005 F.Supp. 821 (D. Colo. 1993) (Concrete Works I). U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19868 (Sept. 8, 2005) (Northern Contracting II). Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 36 F.3d Northern Contracting, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Transportation, 473 1513 (10th Cir. 1994) (Concrete Works II). F.3d 715 (7th Cir. 2007) (Northern Contracting III). Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 86 O'Donnell Construction Co., Inc, v. District of Columbia, 963 F.2d 420 F.Supp.2d 1042 (D. Colo. 2000) (Concrete Works III). (D.C. Cir. 1992). Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 321 F.3d Phillips & Jordan, Inc. v. Watts, 13 F.Supp.2d 1308 (N.D. Fla. 1998). 950 (10th Cir. 2003) (Concrete Works IV), cert. denied, 540 U.S. Rothe Development Corporation v. U.S. Department of Defense, 262 F.3d 1027 (2003). 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (Rothe V). Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County, 908 F.2d 909 (11th Cir. 1990), Rothe Development Corporation v. U.S. Department of Defense, 545 F.3d cert. denied, 498 U.S. 983 (1990). 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (Rothe VII).