Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 26
26 References 1. Shu, X. and N. Wilson. TCRP Research Results Digest 82: Use of tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, Guard/Girder/Restraining Rails. Transportation Research Board, D.C., 2006. The National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 4. Elkins, J., J. Peters, G. Arnold, and B. Rajkumar. "Steady-state 2. Wu, H., X. Shu, N. Wilson, and W. Shust. TCRP Report 71, Track- Curving and Wheel/Rail Wear Properties of a Transit Vehicle on Related Research, Volume 5: Flange Climb Derailment Criteria and the Tight Turn Loop." UMTA-CO-06-0009-83-1, Washington, D.C., Wheel/Rail Profile Management and Maintenance Guidelines for Dec. 1982. Transit Operations. Transportation Research Board, National Research 5. Shu, X. and J. Tunna. "Investigation into Flange Climbing Derail- Council, Washington, D.C., 2005. ment and Distance Criterion with Wheel and Worn Rail Profiles." 3. Griffin, T. Interfleet Technology, Inc., TCRP Report 114: Center Research Report R-982, Association of American Railroads, Trans- Truck Performance on Low-Floor Light Rail Vehicles. Transporta- portation Technology Center, Inc., Feb. 2007.