National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: References
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page 94

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

95 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “Primer on Contracting for the 21st Century,” White paper, Subcommittee on Construction–Contract Administration Task Force, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996, 38 pp. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO Guide for Design-Build Procurement, American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2008, p. 58. American Council of Consulting Engineers, “Qualifications- Based Selection,” Presentation, European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations Conference, Brus- sels, Belgium, Oct. 2004, 40 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.efca.be/downloads/archive/e4b52f1d-0d94- 4e10-ac66-f3d38a410ecb.ppt [accessed Nov. 22, 2008]. “Briefing—FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Quality Through Innovative Contracting,” Practices: Special Experimental Projects No. 14 (SEP-14), Federal Highway Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., 2008 [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/sep_a.cfm [accessed June 7, 2009]. Carter, R., O. Tomeh, G. Darido, D. Schneck, and F. Waesche, Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guide- lines, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/1311_ ENG_HTML.htm [accessed Jan. 24, 2007]. DeBacker, M., “Greener Transportation Infrastructure,” Benchmark Magazine, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 9–13. Drennon, P.W., “Utah’s I-15, a Transportation Case Study: Role of the Owner’s Design Professional in Design/Build and in the Provisions for Quality,” Quality Congress, ASQ’s . . . Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, Mil- waukee, Wis., 1998, p. 166. Grinder, R.D., “U.S. Department of Transportation, a Brief History,” Office of the Department of Transportation Historian, Washington, D.C., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://dotlibrary.dot.gov/Historian/history.htm [accessed June 7, 2009]. Handbook on Project Delivery, California Council, Ameri- can Institute of Architects, Sacramento, 1996. Hess, S.A. and J.V. Bales, Design Professional and Con- struction Manager Law, American Bar Association, Chicago, Ill., 2007, 293 pp. Kessler, F., “Managing Your Money: Project Delivery Meth- ods,” Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliot LLP, White Paper, 2005 [WWW document] [Online]. Available: http://www.nossaman.com/db30/cgi-bin/news/FWK_ MassTransit_04.05.pdf [accessed March 20, 2007]. Migliaccio, G.C., G.E. Gibson, and J.T. O’Connor, “Chang- ing Project Delivery Strategy, an Implementation Frame- work,” Public Works Management & Policy, Vol. 12, No. 3, Jan. 2008, pp. 483–502. “MnDOT’s Response to National Transportation Safety Board Recommendations, I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Nov. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ i35wbridge/ [accessed Dec. 22, 2008]. Nickerson, R.L. and S.A. Sabol, NCHRP Research Results Digest 274: Quality Assurance of Structural Materials, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2003, 21 pp. Oppenheim, A.N., Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Continuum, London, England, 1992. Richter, W.L., Transportation in America, ABC–CLIO, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif., 1995, 631 pp. Shadan, K., R. Dawson, and S. Zeevaart, Construction Proj- ect Management Handbook, Federal Transit Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., 2006, 128 pp. Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning National Association, “The United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design,” Technical Resources Department Background Paper, Chantilly, Va., June 24, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.smacna. org/pdf/LEED%20Background.pdf [accessed May 25, 2009]. University of Washington, “UW: Greenroads,” 2009 [Online]. Available: http://pavementinteractive.org/index. php?title=UW:Green_Roads [accessed May 25, 2009]. Washington State Department of Transportation, Guidebook for Design-Build Highway Project Development, Olympia, June 20, 2004, 85 pp. Wiss, R.A., R.T. Roberts, and S.D. Phraner, “Beyond Design-Build-Operate-Maintain: New Partnership Ap- proach Toward Fixed Guideway Transit Projects,” Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1704, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 13–18. Yates, J.K. and J. Duran, “Utilizing Dispute Review Boards in Relational Contracting: A Case Study,” Journal of Pro- fessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 4, Oct. 2006, pp. 334–342. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Next: Glossary »
Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs Get This Book
×
 Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs explores current methods in which state departments of transportation and other public engineering agencies are applying construction manager-at-risk (CMR) project delivery to their construction projects.

CMR project delivery is an integrated team approach to the planning, design, and construction of a highway project, to help control schedule and budget, and to help ensure quality for the project owner. The team consists of the owner; the designer, who might be an in-house engineer; and the at-risk construction manager. The goal of this project delivery method is to engage at-risk construction expertise early in the design process to enhance constructability, manage risk, and facilitate concurrent execution of design and construction without the owner relinquishing control over the details of design as it would in a design-build project.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!