National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R4
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R5
Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R6
Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R7
Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14350.
×
Page R8

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2010 www.TRB.org NAT IONAL COOPERAT IVE H IGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM NCHRP SYNTHESIS 402 Research Sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration SUBJECT AREAS Planning and Administration, and Materials and Construction Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs A Synthesis of Highway Practice CONSULTANTS DOUGLAS D. GRANSBERG University of Oklahoma and JENNIFER S. SHANE Iowa State University

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective approach to the solution of many problems facing highway administrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local interest and can best be studied by highway departments individually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation develops increasingly complex problems of wide interest to highway authorities. These problems are best studied through a coordinated program of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national highway research program employing modern scientific techniques. This program is supported on a continuing basis by funds from participating member states of the Association and it receives the full cooperation and support of the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation. The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies was requested by the Association to administer the research program because of the Board’s recognized objectivity and understanding of modern research practices. The Board is uniquely suited for this purpose as it maintains an extensive committee structure from which authorities on any highway transportation subject may be drawn; it possesses avenues of communications and cooperation with federal, state, and local governmental agencies, universities, and industry; its relationship to the National Research Council is an insurance of objectivity; it maintains a full-time research correlation staff of specialists in highway transportation matters to bring the findings of research directly to those who are in a position to use them. The program is developed on the basis of research needs identified by chief administrators of the highway and transportation departments and by committees of AASHTO. Each year, specific areas of research needs to be included in the program are proposed to the National Research Council and the Board by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Research projects to fulfill these needs are defined by the Board, and qualified research agencies are selected from those that have submitted proposals. Administration and surveillance of research contracts are the responsibilities of the National Research Council and the Transportation Research Board. The needs for highway research are many, and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program can make significant contributions to the solution of highway transportation problems of mutual concern to many responsible groups. The program, however, is intended to complement rather than to substitute for or duplicate other highway research programs. Published reports of the NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM are available from: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 and can be ordered through the Internet at: http://www.national-academies.org/trb/bookstore Printed in the United States of America NCHRP SYNTHESIS 402 Project 20-5 (Topic 40-02) ISSN 0547-5570 ISBN 978-0-309-14301-1 Library of Congress Control No. 2009938319 © 2010 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, or Transit Development Corporation endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP. NOTICE The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Such approval reflects the Governing Board’s judgment that the program concerned is of national importance and appropriate with respect to both the purposes and resources of the National Research Council. The members of the technical committee selected to monitor this project and to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with due consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the research, and, while they have been accepted as appropriate by the technical committee, they are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Each report is reviewed and accepted for publication by the technical committee according to procedures established and monitored by the Transportation Research Board Executive Committee and the Governing Board of the National Research Council. NOTE: The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, and the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished schol- ars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and techni- cal matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Acad- emy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achieve- ments of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academyís purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Acad- emy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scien- tific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both the Academies and the Insti- tute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisci- plinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation depart- ments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org

NCHRP COMMITTEE FOR PROJECT 20-5 CHAIR CATHERINE NELSON, Oregon DOT MEMBERS KATHLEEN S. AMES, Springfield, Illinois STUART D. ANDERSON, Texas A&M University CYNTHIA J. BURBANK, PB America, Alexandria, Virginia LISA FREESE, Scott County (MN) Public Works Division MALCOLM T. KERLEY, Virginia DOT RICHARD D. LAND, California DOT JAMES W. MARCH, Federal Highway Administration MARK A. MAREK, Texas DOT JOHN M. MASON, JR., Auburn University ANANTH PRASAD, HNTB Corporation ROBERT L. SACK, New York State DOT FRANCINE SHAW-WHITSON, Federal Highway Administration LARRY VELASQUEZ, New Mexico DOT FHWA LIAISON WILLIAM ZACCAGNINO TRB LIAISON STEPHEN F. MAHER COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMS STAFF CHRISTOPHER W. JENKS, Director, Cooperative Research Programs CRAWFORD F. JENCKS, Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Programs NANDA SRINIVASAN, Senior Program Officer EILEEN DELANEY, Director of Publications NCHRP SYNTHESIS STAFF STEPHEN R. GODWIN, Director for Studies and Special Programs JON M. WILLIAMS, Program Director, IDEA and Synthesis Studies GAIL R. STABA, Senior Program Officer DONNA L. VLASAK, Senior Program Officer DON TIPPMAN, Editor CHERYL KEITH, Senior Program Assistant TOPIC PANEL STUART D. ANDERSON, Texas A&M University FREDERICK HEJL, Transportation Research Board JAY HIETPAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation JIM McMINIMEE, Utah Department of Transportation ANANTH PRASAD, HNTB Corporation RODGER D. ROCHELLE, North Carolina Department of Transportation PORIE SAIKIA-EAPEN, CH2M Hill RAYMOND S. TRITT, California Department of Transportation PETER A. KOPAC, Federal Highway Administration (Liaison) GERALD YAKOWENKO, Federal Highway Administration (Liaison)

Highway administrators, engineers, and researchers often face problems for which infor- mation already exists, either in documented form or as undocumented experience and prac- tice. This information may be fragmented, scattered, and unevaluated. As a consequence, full knowledge of what has been learned about a problem may not be brought to bear on its solution. Costly research findings may go unused, valuable experience may be overlooked, and due consideration may not be given to recommended practices for solving or alleviat- ing the problem. There is information on nearly every subject of concern to highway administrators and engineers. Much of it derives from research or from the work of practitioners faced with problems in their day-to-day work. To provide a systematic means for assembling and eval- uating such useful information and to make it available to the entire highway community, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials—through the mechanism of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program—authorized the Transportation Research Board to undertake a continuing study. This study, NCHRP Proj- ect 20-5, “Synthesis of Information Related to Highway Problems,” searches out and syn- thesizes useful knowledge from all available sources and prepares concise, documented reports on specific topics. Reports from this endeavor constitute an NCHRP report series, Synthesis of Highway Practice. This synthesis series reports on current knowledge and practice, in a compact format, without the detailed directions usually found in handbooks or design manuals. Each report in the series provides a compendium of the best knowledge available on those measures found to be the most successful in resolving specific problems. FOREWORD Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMR) project delivery (also called Construction Manager/ General Contractor or CM/GC) is an integrated team approach to the planning, design, and construction of a highway project, to control schedule and budget, and to ensure quality for the project owner. The team consists of the owner; the designer, who might be an in-house engineer; and the at-risk construction manager. The aim of this project delivery method is to engage at-risk construction expertise early in the design process to enhance constructabil- ity, manage risk, and facilitate concurrent execution of design and construction without the owner relinquishing control over the details of design as it would in a design-build project. CMR project delivery has long been used in the building industry, but the use of CMR for federal-aid transportation projects requires SEP-14 approval. As a result, its use is rel- atively new in highway projects. A number of state and local transportation agencies have undertaken or experimented with CMR project delivery on road, bridge, and other projects. The objective of this synthesis is to identify and synthesize current methods in which state departments of transportation (DOTs) and other public engineering agencies are applying CMR project delivery to their construction projects. The intended audience is transportation agencies that wish to explore CMR or alternative contracting methods. The synthesis identifies three different models for CMR project delivery in use and effec- tive practices and lessons learned that have been gleaned from the experiences of seven highway case studies (Alaska, Florida, Michigan, Oregon, and Utah DOTs, plus Pinal County and the city of Glendale, both in Arizona) and case studies from the airport, rail transit, and building industries; the Memphis Airport in Tennessee; the Utah Transit Agency; and Texas Tech University. Survey responses were received from 47 state DOTs regarding CMR experience. A formal content analysis of CMR solicitation documents from 25 transportation projects and 29 non-transportation projects from 17 states was also con- ducted. Finally, structured interviews were conducted with both agency and contractor per- sonnel from the case study projects. PREFACE By Gail Staba Senior Program Officer Transportation Research Board

Douglas D. Gransberg, University of Oklahoma, and Jennifer S. Shane, Iowa State Uni- versity, collected and synthesized the information and wrote the report. The members of the topic panel are acknowledged on the preceding page. This synthesis is an immediately use- ful document that records the practices that were acceptable within the limitations of the knowledge available at the time of its preparation. As progress in research and practice con- tinues, new knowledge will be added to that now at hand.

CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY 5 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Background, 5 Synthesis Objective, 6 Project Delivery Methods, 6 Key Definitions, 9 Study Instruments, 10 11 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE, METHODOLOGY, AND CASE STUDIES Introduction, 11 Literature Summary, 11 Synthesis Methodology, 16 Case Study Summary, 20 Rationale for Choosing Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery, 22 Construction Manager-at-Risk Procurement Procedures, 23 Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Administration, 24 Preconstruction Services, 26 Summary, 26 27 CHAPTER THREE PROCEDURES Introduction, 27 State Laws, 27 Project Delivery Procedures, 30 Summary, 33 34 CHAPTER FOUR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK SELECTION METHODS Introduction, 34 Construction Manager-at-Risk Selection Models, 34 Content Analysis Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal Submittal Requirements, 40 Selection Process Details, 41 Selection Process Protests, 46 Construction Manager-at-Risk Selection Impact on Competition, 49 Summary, 49 51 CHAPTER FIVE PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES Introduction, 51 Design-Related Preconstruction Services, 51 Cost-Related Preconstruction Services, 56 Schedule-Related Preconstruction Services, 57 Administrative Preconstruction Services, 59 Preconstruction Fees and Design Cost Impact, 60 Summary, 63

65 CHAPTER SIX PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHING THE GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE Introduction, 65 Project Direct Costs, 65 Construction Manager-at-Risk’s General Conditions and Overhead Costs, 70 Construction Manager-at-Risk Fee, 70 Contingency Development, 71 Guaranteed Maximum Price Administrative Items, 73 Summary, 76 77 CHAPTER SEVEN QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES Introduction, 77 Quality Management in Design Phase, 77 Quality Management in Contruction Phase, 79 Quality Outcomes, 80 Summary, 81 82 CHAPTER EIGHT BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION Introduction, 82 Legislative-Level Barriers, 82 Organizational-Level Barriers, 82 Project-Level Barriers, 84 Conclusions, 84 85 CHAPTER NINE CONCLUSIONS Introduction, 85 Conclusions, 85 Lessons Learned, 87 Further Research, 88 Summary, 90 91 REFERENCES 95 BIBLIOGRAPHY 96 GLOSSARY 98 APPENDIX A NATIONAL SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 100 APPENDIX B CASE STUDY PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE 114 APPENDIX C CASE STUDY PROJECTS

Next: Summary »
Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs explores current methods in which state departments of transportation and other public engineering agencies are applying construction manager-at-risk (CMR) project delivery to their construction projects.

CMR project delivery is an integrated team approach to the planning, design, and construction of a highway project, to help control schedule and budget, and to help ensure quality for the project owner. The team consists of the owner; the designer, who might be an in-house engineer; and the at-risk construction manager. The goal of this project delivery method is to engage at-risk construction expertise early in the design process to enhance constructability, manage risk, and facilitate concurrent execution of design and construction without the owner relinquishing control over the details of design as it would in a design-build project.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!