National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 646: Validating the Fatigue Endurance Limit for Hot Mix Asphalt (2010)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Anderson, R Michael, Carpenter, Samuel H, Daniel, Jo Sias, Prowell, Brian D, Shen, Shihui, Bhattacharjee, Sudip, Swamy, Aravind Krishna, Brown, E Ray, Von Quintus, Harold, Maghsoodloo, Saeed, Transportation Research Board. "Scope." NCHRP Report 646: Validating the Fatigue Endurance Limit for Hot Mix Asphalt. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
6
bottomleft bottomright
Page
6
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-4)
Introduction (5-5)
Scope (6-6)
Arguments for the Existence of the Endurance Limit (7-8)
Strategies to Produce Long-Life Pavements (9-11)
Laboratory Fatigue Tests and Analysis Methods (12-12)
Modeling Fatigue and Relationship to Field Performance (13-14)
Introduction (15-15)
Materials (16-16)
Test Methods (17-19)
Extrapolation Methods to Predict Fatigue Life (20-31)
Existence of the Endurance Limit (32-40)
Estimate of Precision of Beam Fatigue Tests (41-41)
Indirect Tensile Strength as a Surrogate for Endurance Limit Determination (42-43)
Dynamic Modulus and Phase Angle Master Curves (44-48)
Damage Characteristic Curve (49-52)
Evaluation of Endurance Limit (53-58)
Including the Endurance Limit Design Premise into Mechanistic-Empirical-Based Pavement Design Procedures (59-61)
Defining the Endurance Limit - A Survivability Analysis (62-65)
Updated Survivability Analysis Using LTPP Data (66-72)
Estimate of Shift Factors between Laboratory Tests and Field Performance (73-82)
Sensitivity of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Methods to the Endurance Limit (83-87)
Considerations for Incorporating the Endurance Limit into M-E Design Procedures (88-90)
Recommendations (91-92)
References (93-95)
Appendix A - Proposed Standard Practice for Predicting the Endurance Limit of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) for Long-Life Pavement Design (96-104)
Appendix B - Proposed Standard Practice for Predicting the Endurance Limit of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by Pseudo Strain Approach (105-110)
Appendix C - Proposed Standard Practice for Extrapolating Long-Life Beam Fatigue Tests Using the Ratio of Dissipated Energy Change (RDEC) (111-115)
Appendix D - NCHRP 9-38 Beam Fatigue (116-120)
Appendix E - Construction of Characteristic Curve (121-125)
Appendix F - NCHRP 9-38 Beam Fatigue Round Robin (126-127)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (128-128)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 6
6 been termed fatigue endurance limit. If a pavement is designed Objectives and constructed so that under repeated traffic loads no dam- age occurs, then that pavement should last indefinitely without The objectives of this study are to a structural failure. This pavement will still require overlays on some regular basis to maintain the surface in good operating 1. Test the hypothesis that there is an endurance limit in the condition, but the pavement structure should provide a very fatigue behavior of HMA mixtures and measure its value long life. for a representative range of HMA mixtures. 2. Recommend a procedure to incorporate the effects of the endurance limit into mechanistic pavement design Research Problem Statement methods. Work is needed to determine if there is an endurance limit for HMA and, if so, how this information should be used in Scope pavement design. One would not want to design all pave- ments, regardless of traffic level, so that the endurance limit This study included a literature review, laboratory testing, is not exceeded since this would result in the same design and analysis of field data. A mix design, used to construct struc- thickness regardless of traffic level. For very high traffic lev- tural sections at the 2003 National Center for Asphalt Technol- els it might be desirable to design the pavement so that the ogy (NCAT) Test Track, was replicated. Four versions of the endurance limit is not exceeded, but for low traffic levels it mix design were evaluated encompassing the effect of increased is likely that this approach would be too expensive. How- asphalt binder content and polymer modification. The mix- ever, a similar concept could be employed for pavements tures with higher asphalt binder contents were prepared at subject to very low traffic levels to ensure a long life. As always, higher densities to simulate the improvement in compaction the pavement should be designed to provide the lowest life- expected in the field. Beam fatigue and uniaxial tension test- cycle costs. ing were conducted to determine fatigue life. Beam fatigue Hence, there is a need first of all to determine if there is testing was conducted at progressively lower strain levels until an endurance limit for HMA. Once the endurance limit is a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles was achieved. Data determined it is important to determine how this endurance from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) study limit would fit into the new mechanistic pavement design were analyzed to determine if they supported the endurance procedures. limit concept.