Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 121

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 120
120 References Chapter 1 2. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 1. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace 3. Cambridge Systematics, Bay Area/California High Speed Rail Ridership 20072025, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. and Revenue Forecasting Study. Prepared for the Metropolitan Trans- 2. Airports Council International--North America, 2008. portation Commission and California High Speed Rail Authority, 3. Map, Microsoft Streets and Trips, 2007, copyright Microsoft July 2007. Corporation and its Suppliers. 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administra- 4. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of tion, and California High Speed Rail Authority, "Bay Area to Central the BTS. Valley High-Speed Train (HST) Program Environmental Impact 5. Performance data accessed from Research and Innovative Technol- Report, Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)." May, 2008; ogy Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, http://www. Calculated from Table 3.2-12. "2030 Intercity Trip Table Summary for the Base Case Scenario." 6. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No. FAA2008 5. U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, High Speed Ground Trans- portation for America. 1997. Ridership forecasts developed by 0036], RIN 2120AF90, Policy Regarding Airport Rates and CRA International for Volpe National Transportation Systems Charges. Published in the Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, Center. January 17, 2008 Notices, p. 3312. 6. Cambridge Systematics, FRA Commercial Feasibility Studies, and 7. Goldberg, B. and D. Chesser, "Sitting on the Runway: Current Air- other sources, summarized in Desert Xpress Ridership Review. Pre- craft Taxi Times Now Exceed Pre-9/11 Experience," U.S. DOT BTS pared for the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, February Special Report, May 2008. 2008. 8. U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff, Your Flight 7. Ohio Passenger Rail News, Vol. 1 Issue 3, February 2009. Has Been Delayed Again: Flight Delays Cost Passengers, Airlines, and 8. Amtrak, showing results for the first quarter of 2008. the U.S. Economy Billions, May 2008. 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, "Analysis of the Benefits of 9. Adler, T., C. Falzarano, and G. Spitz, "Modeling Service Trade-offs High-Speed Rail on the Northeast Corridor," Office of the in Air Itinerary Choices," Transportation Research Record 1915, Inspector General, Office of the Secretary, Information Memo- Transportation Research Board, National Research Council Wash- randum, June 16, 2008. Ridership forecasts developed by CRA ington, D.C., 2005. International. 10. Louviere, J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis 10. New York State Senate High Speed Rail Task Force Action Program, and Application, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 2008; Chapter Three, pp. 38. Ridership forecasts developed by 11. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Emissions: A Primer, CRA International. Office of Environment and Energy, January 2005. 11. NEC Master Plan, Service Planning Discussion. 12. Center for Clean Air Policy, High Speed Rail and Greenhouse Gas 12. Amtrak "Fact Sheet" from, accessed March, 2008 Emissions in the U.S., January 2006. 13. A Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. DOT, American Travel 13. Smirti, M. and M. Hansen, Assessing the Role of Operator, Passenger Survey, 1995. and Infrastructure Costs in Fleet Planning Under Fuel Price Uncer- 14. tainty, Proceedings of the 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management 15. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Intermodal Transportation: Research and Development Seminar, 2009. Potential Strategies Would Redefine Federal Role in Developing Airport Intermodal Capabilities, 2005. 16. Chapter 2 43BE-8100-A5D1A78D149E. 17. Continental Airlines website. 1. Steer Davies Gleave, Air and Rail Competition and Complementarity 18. Coogan, M., et al. ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports Final Report. Prepared for the EU's Directorate General for Energy by Public Transportation, Transportation Research Board of the and Transportation, August 2006. National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 2008.

OCR for page 120
121 19. I-95 Corridor Coalition, "Intermodal Service at the Newark 5. MASSPORT. Proposed Demand Management Program For Boston Liberty International Airport Train Station: Observations and Logan International Airport. Prepared for the Federal Aviation Lessons Learned"; available at Administration, 2004. management/Upfiles/reports/full268.pdf. 6. U.S. Government Accountability Office, National Airspace System: 20. Strata Consulting, 2008 for ACRP 3-10. DOT and FAA Actions Will Likely Have a Limited Effect on Reduc- ing Delays during Summer 2008 Travel Season. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, and Security, Chapter 3 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. GAO-08-934T, 2008. 1. Plumeau P., "Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the United 7. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and the Office of the Secretary States--Issues and Challenges," Chapter 8 in Competition and Own- of Transportation. Airport Business Practices and Their Impact on ership in Land Passenger Transport: Selected Papers from the 9th Inter- Airline Competition. Task Force Study, October 1999. national Conference (Thredbo 9), Lisbon, September 2005. 2. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration-New England Region, The 8. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. OEP Frequently Asked New England Regional Airport System Plan, 2008. Questions--OEP 35 Airports. 3. "Strategic Initiatives at Logan International Airport," presentation by headquarters_offices/ato/publications/oep/faq/Airports/index.cfm Flavio Lee, Manager of Aviation Planning, Massport, June 23, 2007. (2007). Accessed on February 26, 2009. 4. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, 20062010 FAA Flight Plan. 9. Leo, F. Strategic Initiatives at Logan International Airport. Pre- 5. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Regional Airport System sented at the Regional Airport Planning Committee on June 23, Plan Update 2000, September 2000. 2007. 6. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments website, "Con- 10. Small, K., C. Winston, and C. Evans. Road Work: A New Highway tinuous Airport System Planning" page, Pricing and Investment Policy. Brookings Institution, 1989. transportation/activities/airports/, accessed March 3, 2009. 11. Hecker, J. Reducing Congestion: Congestion Pricing Has Promise 7. Pagnanelli, L., "The Airport System Planning Process: An FAA Per- for Improving Use of Transportation Infrastructure. U.S. General spective," presentation to Planning at the Edge Meeting, April 9, Accounting Office, Testimony Before the Joint Economic Com- 2008. mittee U.S. Congress, May 2003. 12. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. Program Guidance Letter 04-08, Airport Competition Plans. Chapter 4 airtraffic/airports/aip/guidance_letters/media/PGL_04-08.pdf (2004). Accessed on March 10, 2009. 1. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 2. U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationNew England Region, The Chapter 6 New England Regional Airport System Plan, 2008. 3. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace 1. Quoted in Coogan, M. A., Freight Transportation Planning Practices 20072025, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. in the Public Sector, NCHRP Synthesis Report of Highway Practice 230, 1996. 2. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of Chapter 5 the BTS. 1. Hansen, M. M., et al. "Influence of Capacity Constraints on Air- 3. U.S. Government Accountability Office. High Speed Passenger Rail, line Fleet Mix. Research Report," UCB-ITS-RR-2001-6, August Future Development Will Depend on Addressing Financial and 2001. Other Challenges and Establishing a Clear Federal Role. GAO-09- 2. Federal Register at 3310 FR/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, January 17, 317, March 2009. 2008. 4. American Travel Survey, 1995 3. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary and 5. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace Federal Aviation Administration. Policy Regarding Airport Rates 20072025, Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. and Charges. Docket No. FAA-2008-0036. Volume 73, Number 6. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, [Docket No. FAA2008 135, July 14, 2008. 0036], RIN 2120AF90, Policy Regarding Airport Rates and 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, regulations on airport noise Charges. Published in the Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, and access restrictions (14 CFR Part 161), August 2008. January 17, 2008 Notices, p. 3312.