National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6 - What Was Learned, and What Are the Next Steps
Page 120
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Innovative Approaches to Addressing Aviation Capacity Issues in Coastal Mega-regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14363.
×
Page 120
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Innovative Approaches to Addressing Aviation Capacity Issues in Coastal Mega-regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14363.
×
Page 121

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

120 Chapter 1 1. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace 2007–2025, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. 2. Airports Council International—North America, 2008. 3. Map, Microsoft Streets and Trips, 2007, copyright Microsoft Corporation and its Suppliers. 4. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 5. Performance data accessed from Research and Innovative Technol- ogy Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, http://www. transtats.bts.gov/airports.asp. 6. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No. FAA–2008– 0036], RIN 2120–AF90, Policy Regarding Airport Rates and Charges. Published in the Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, January 17, 2008 Notices, p. 3312. 7. Goldberg, B. and D. Chesser, “Sitting on the Runway: Current Air- craft Taxi Times Now Exceed Pre-9/11 Experience,” U.S. DOT BTS Special Report, May 2008. 8. U.S. Senate Joint Economic Committee Majority Staff, Your Flight Has Been Delayed Again: Flight Delays Cost Passengers, Airlines, and the U.S. Economy Billions, May 2008. 9. Adler, T., C. Falzarano, and G. Spitz, “Modeling Service Trade-offs in Air Itinerary Choices,” Transportation Research Record 1915, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council Wash- ington, D.C., 2005. 10. Louviere, J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 11. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Emissions: A Primer, Office of Environment and Energy, January 2005. 12. Center for Clean Air Policy, High Speed Rail and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the U.S., January 2006. 13. Smirti, M. and M. Hansen, Assessing the Role of Operator, Passenger and Infrastructure Costs in Fleet Planning Under Fuel Price Uncer- tainty, Proceedings of the 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2009. Chapter 2 1. Steer Davies Gleave, Air and Rail Competition and Complementarity Final Report. Prepared for the EU’s Directorate General for Energy and Transportation, August 2006. 2. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 3. Cambridge Systematics, Bay Area/California High Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study. Prepared for the Metropolitan Trans- portation Commission and California High Speed Rail Authority, July 2007. 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administra- tion, and California High Speed Rail Authority, “Bay Area to Central Valley High-Speed Train (HST) Program Environmental Impact Report, Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS).” May, 2008; Calculated from Table 3.2-12. “2030 Intercity Trip Table Summary for the Base Case Scenario.” 5. U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, High Speed Ground Trans- portation for America. 1997. Ridership forecasts developed by CRA International for Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. 6. Cambridge Systematics, FRA Commercial Feasibility Studies, and other sources, summarized in Desert Xpress Ridership Review. Pre- pared for the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, February 2008. 7. Ohio Passenger Rail News, Vol. 1 Issue 3, February 2009. 8. Amtrak, showing results for the first quarter of 2008. 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, “Analysis of the Benefits of High-Speed Rail on the Northeast Corridor,” Office of the Inspector General, Office of the Secretary, Information Memo- randum, June 16, 2008. Ridership forecasts developed by CRA International. 10. New York State Senate High Speed Rail Task Force Action Program, 2008; Chapter Three, pp. 3–8. Ridership forecasts developed by CRA International. 11. NEC Master Plan, Service Planning Discussion. 12. Amtrak “Fact Sheet” from www.amtrak.com, accessed March, 2008 13. A Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. DOT, American Travel Survey, 1995. 14. http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/public/show/missedconn. 15. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Intermodal Transportation: Potential Strategies Would Redefine Federal Role in Developing Airport Intermodal Capabilities, 2005. 16. http://www.pvdairport.com/main.aspx?guid=8BA8B370-031D- 43BE-8100-A5D1A78D149E. 17. Continental Airlines website. 18. Coogan, M., et al. ACRP Report 4: Ground Access to Major Airports by Public Transportation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 2008. References

121 19. I-95 Corridor Coalition, “Intermodal Service at the Newark Liberty International Airport Train Station: Observations and Lessons Learned”; available at http://66.167.232.132/pm/project management/Upfiles/reports/full268.pdf. 20. Strata Consulting, 2008 for ACRP 3-10. Chapter 3 1. Plumeau P., “Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the United States—Issues and Challenges,” Chapter 8 in Competition and Own- ership in Land Passenger Transport: Selected Papers from the 9th Inter- national Conference (Thredbo 9), Lisbon, September 2005. 2. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration-New England Region, The New England Regional Airport System Plan, 2008. 3. “Strategic Initiatives at Logan International Airport,” presentation by Flavio Lee, Manager of Aviation Planning, Massport, June 23, 2007. 4. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, 2006–2010 FAA Flight Plan. 5. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Regional Airport System Plan Update 2000, September 2000. 6. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments website, “Con- tinuous Airport System Planning” page, http://www.mwcog.org/ transportation/activities/airports/, accessed March 3, 2009. 7. Pagnanelli, L., “The Airport System Planning Process: An FAA Per- spective,” presentation to Planning at the Edge Meeting, April 9, 2008. Chapter 4 1. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 2. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration–New England Region, The New England Regional Airport System Plan, 2008. 3. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace 2007–2025, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. Chapter 5 1. Hansen, M. M., et al. “Influence of Capacity Constraints on Air- line Fleet Mix. Research Report,” UCB-ITS-RR-2001-6, August 2001. 2. Federal Register at 3310 FR/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, January 17, 2008. 3. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary and Federal Aviation Administration. Policy Regarding Airport Rates and Charges. Docket No. FAA-2008-0036. Volume 73, Number 135, July 14, 2008. 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, regulations on airport noise and access restrictions (14 CFR Part 161), August 2008. 5. MASSPORT. Proposed Demand Management Program For Boston Logan International Airport. Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, 2004. 6. U.S. Government Accountability Office, National Airspace System: DOT and FAA Actions Will Likely Have a Limited Effect on Reduc- ing Delays during Summer 2008 Travel Season. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety, and Security, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. GAO-08-934T, 2008. 7. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. Airport Business Practices and Their Impact on Airline Competition. Task Force Study, October 1999. 8. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. OEP Frequently Asked Questions—OEP 35 Airports. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/ headquarters_offices/ato/publications/oep/faq/Airports/index.cfm (2007). Accessed on February 26, 2009. 9. Leo, F. Strategic Initiatives at Logan International Airport. Pre- sented at the Regional Airport Planning Committee on June 23, 2007. 10. Small, K., C. Winston, and C. Evans. Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. Brookings Institution, 1989. 11. Hecker, J. Reducing Congestion: Congestion Pricing Has Promise for Improving Use of Transportation Infrastructure. U.S. General Accounting Office, Testimony Before the Joint Economic Com- mittee U.S. Congress, May 2003. 12. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. Program Guidance Letter 04-08, Airport Competition Plans. http://www.faa.gov/airports_ airtraffic/airports/aip/guidance_letters/media/PGL_04-08.pdf (2004). Accessed on March 10, 2009. Chapter 6 1. Quoted in Coogan, M. A., Freight Transportation Planning Practices in the Public Sector, NCHRP Synthesis Report of Highway Practice 230, 1996. 2. ACRP 3-10 Database, derived from the DB1B and T-100 data of the BTS. 3. U.S. Government Accountability Office. High Speed Passenger Rail, Future Development Will Depend on Addressing Financial and Other Challenges and Establishing a Clear Federal Role. GAO-09- 317, March 2009. 4. American Travel Survey, 1995 5. MITRE Corporation, Capacity Needs in the National Airspace 2007–2025, Federal Aviation Administration, May 2007. 6. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, [Docket No. FAA–2008– 0036], RIN 2120–AF90, Policy Regarding Airport Rates and Charges. Published in the Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 12/Thursday, January 17, 2008 Notices, p. 3312.

Next: Appendix A - Airport Interviews and Technology Issues »
Innovative Approaches to Addressing Aviation Capacity Issues in Coastal Mega-regions Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report 31: Innovative Approaches to Addressing Aviation Capacity Issues in Coastal Mega-regions examines the aviation capacity issues in the two coastal mega-regions located along the East and West coasts of the United States. The report explores integrated strategic actions to that could potentially address the constrained aviation system capacity and growing travel demand in the high-density, multijurisdictional, multimodal, coastal mega-regions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!