Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 8
8
TABLE 1
AGENCIES PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY
Agency System
U.S. Deployments
City of Longview, TX ACS Lite
W.E. Stilson Consulting Group, LLC, Columbus, OH ACS Lite
City of Little Rock, AR InSync
California Department of Transportation -- District 7, CA LA ATCS
Culver City, CA LA ATCS
Los Angeles Department of Transportation, CA LA ATCS
City of Chesapeake, VA OPAC
Town of Cary, NC OPAC
Virginia Department of Transportation, VA OPAC
Pinellas County, FL OPAC, RHODES
City of Tucson, AZ RHODES
Washington State DOT, WA RHODES
City of Chula Vista, CA SCATS
City of Gresham, OR SCATS
City of Menlo Park, CA SCATS
City of Santa Rosa, CA SCATS
City of Sunnyvale, CA SCATS
Cobb County, GA SCATS
Delaware Department of Transportation, DE SCATS
Florida DOT District 4, FL SCATS
Minnesota Department of Transportation, MN SCATS
Pasco County, FL SCATS
Road Commission for Oakland County, MI SCATS
Utah Department of Transportation, UT SCATS
City of Anaheim, CA SCOOT
City of Ann Arbor, MI SCOOT
Collier County, FL SCOOT
Orange County, FL SCOOT
Reedy Creek Improvement District, FL SCOOT
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., MN SCOOT
International Deployments
Econolite Canada Inc., Canada RHODES
Dublin City Council, Ireland SCATS
New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland, NZ SCATS
RTA, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia SCATS
UOCT, Concepcion, Chile SCATS
VicRoads, Victoria, Australia SCATS
City of Blackpool Council, UK SCOOT
City of Red Deer, Canada SCOOT
City of Southampton, UK SCOOT
City of Toronto, Canada SCOOT
Derby City Council, UK SCOOTS
Greater Manchester Urban Traffic Control Unit, SCOOTS
Halifax Regional Municipality, Canada SCOOTS
Hampshire County Council, UK SCOOTS
I Mo TS Siemans Ltd., Beijing, China SCOOTS
after they left their respective agencies. Also, in few instances, ANALYSIS APPROACH
individuals from agencies that do not currently run ATCSs
were interviewed. Some of these agencies went through an The analysis approach had two major components. First, when-
ATCS procurement process but decided not to install a system. ever ATCS users responded to a multiple-choice question,
Other agencies had only probationary deployments of their results were reported in the text without (or with minimal)
ATCSs, which were removed after the trial periods. Finally, further manipulation. For the questions considered to be very
some agencies that shut down their ATCSs were also inter- important, the descriptions of the results were accompanied by
viewed. Overall, the response rate from North American ATCS corresponding charts or tables. In the event of open-ended
users was slightly more than 80%. questions, answers were categorized before being presented.
