National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 648: Mixing and Compaction Temperatures of Asphalt Binders in Hot-Mix Asphalt (2010)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Watson, Donald E, West, Randy C, Turner, Pamela A, Casola, John R, Transportation Research Board. "Shear Rate Dependency." NCHRP Report 648: Mixing and Compaction Temperatures of Asphalt Binders in Hot-Mix Asphalt. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
14
bottomleft bottomright
Page
14
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-4)
A Note on Units of Viscosity (5-5)
Background on the Development of Mixing and Compaction Temperature Criteria (6-7)
Effect of Temperature on Degradation of Asphalt Binders (8-8)
Mixing and Compaction Temperatures for Modified Asphalt Binders (9-9)
Survey of Current Practices for Determining Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (10-12)
Zero Shear Viscosity (13-13)
Shear Rate Dependency (14-14)
Workability (15-15)
Shear Rates During Mixing and Compaction (16-18)
Summary of Key Findings from the Literature Review (19-19)
Overview of the Experimental Research Plan (20-21)
Organization of the Test Plan (22-22)
Part 2: Mixture Tests (23-23)
Binder Tests (24-29)
Mixture Tests (30-30)
Summary of Research Plan (31-32)
Phase Angle Method (33-33)
SEP Tests (34-36)
Analysis of Binder Degradation (37-42)
Mixture Coating Tests (43-44)
Mixture Coating Tests with Incompletely Dried Aggregate (45-45)
Workability Tests (46-46)
Compaction Tests (47-52)
Indirect Tensile Creep Compliance and Strength (53-58)
Correlation of Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (59-65)
Comparison of SSF and Phase Angle Methods (66-67)
Validation Experiment Results and Analysis (68-71)
Summary of Key Findings (72-72)
Independent Validation (73-73)
Training (74-75)
References (76-77)
Appendix A - Responses of Survey on Agency Specifications Regarding Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (78-83)
Appendix B - Mix Design Data for Base Mix and Other Compaction Experiment Mixes (84-85)
Appendix C - Draft AASHTO Standard for Steady Shear Flow and Phase Angle Methods (86-135)
Appendix D - Statistical Analyses of the Steady Shear Flow and Phase Angle Methods (136-147)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (148-148)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 14
14 temperatures were about 40°C below the equiviscous tem- 400 peratures. They recommended that the equiviscous method 350 be used to determine mixing and compaction temperatures Viscosity (PaS) 300 for Newtonian binders and the ZSV method be used for 250 modified binders. 200 150 76°C Extrapolated High Shear Rate Viscosity 100 82°C 50 88°C Yildirim et al. (43) presented an approach that estimates 0 92°C high shear rate binder viscosity from rotational viscosity 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 measurements for the determination of mixing and com- Shear Stress, Pa paction temperatures. The shear rate of 490 1/s was selected Figure 6. Steady shear viscosity over a range of from experimental work with mixtures compacted in a SGC. shear stresses. The same mixtures were prepared with four different binders and then compacted in the SGC over a range of relatively low temperatures (between 50°C and 95°C) to amplify the effect of temperature on mix density. It was hypothesized that tures ranging from 76°C to 94°C (169°F to 201°F). At high equivalent mix densities would occur when the viscosities of shear stresses, around 500 Pa, the viscosities of modified binders were the same. To find the point where binder vis- binders approach a steady state (i.e., very small change in vis- cosities were the same, the binders were tested in a Brookfield cosity with increasing shear stress). This is illustrated in Fig- viscometer at shear rates ranging from 0.1 1/s to 93 1/s. These ure 6. Using a log-log temperature-viscosity chart, the viscosi- viscosity data were extrapolated to find the shear rate where ties from the 500-Pa shear flow tests are extrapolated out to the unmodified asphalt and the modified asphalts had the 180°C (356°F). As with unmodified binder using the equivis- same viscosity. The hypothesis was that the shear rate at which cous principle, the recommended mixing temperature is the viscosities of binders intersect is equivalent to the shear based on a viscosity of 0.17 ± 0.02 Pa s. The recommended rate that the mix experiences in the gyratory mold during compaction temperature from the steady shear flow tech- compaction. The average equiviscous shear rate for the eight nique is 0.35 ± 0.03 Pa s, which is higher than the equiviscous pairs of mixtures was 487 1/s, which was rounded to 490 1/s. compaction range of 0.28 ± 0.03 Pa s. Reinke indicated that the The extrapolated viscosity of binders at 490 1/s was referred mixing and compaction temperatures derived from the steady to as the high shear rate viscosity. Using a shear rate of 490 1/s, shear flow method for the few polymer-modified binders eval- the traditional viscosity criteria of 0.17 ± 0.02 Pa s for mix- uated matched well to the temperature ranges successfully ing, and 0.28 ± 0.03 Pa s for compaction, they determined used in practice. mixing and compaction temperatures for the four modified binders to be 10°C to 40°C (18°F to 72°F) below the respec- Shear Rate Dependency tive temperatures from AASHTO T 312. This method was criticized on several points (44). One As noted previously, Shenoy (36) proposed a technique of issue with this approach was the use of unrealistically low selecting mixing temperatures based on shear rate dependency compaction temperatures and then using viscosity measure- and other factors. The study included only two polymer- ments at those temperatures to extrapolate viscosity-shear modified asphalts, Styrelf® and Novophalt®. The binders and rate data. The accuracy of the estimates for viscosities at the a diabase filler were mixed at four temperatures ranging from recommended shear rate of 490 1/s was questioned. At higher 150 to 200°C (302 to 392°F) and tested in the Brookfield vis- temperatures typical of the range normally used in the labo- cometer with three spindles to generate viscosities over a range ratory, the binders would have exhibited less shear thinning of shear rates. The ratio of viscosities for the filled binder behavior and thus the extrapolations would be different. divided by the unfilled binder showed a pessimum point for the Novophalt® around 180°C (356°F). For the Styrelf®, the viscosity ratio was at an apparent minimum around 163°C. Steady Shear Flow Shenoy selected the mixing temperature range for the binders Reinke (45) presented another concept, which he called the based on a table of pass/fail criteria for shear-rate dependency, steady shear flow test, to determine mixing and compaction fluidity, Arrhenius plot smoothness, degradation, aging, and temperatures. This approach uses a DSR with a 500-micron viscosity ratio. This yielded mixing temperatures of 180°C gap and a 25-mm-diameter plate geometry. The viscosities of (356°F) for the Novophalt® binder and a range of 163°C to binders are tested over a range of shear stresses at tempera- 180°C (325°F to 356°F) for the Styrelf® binder.