Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 15

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 14
14 temperatures were about 40C below the equiviscous tem- 400 peratures. They recommended that the equiviscous method 350 be used to determine mixing and compaction temperatures Viscosity (PaS) 300 for Newtonian binders and the ZSV method be used for 250 modified binders. 200 150 76C Extrapolated High Shear Rate Viscosity 100 82C 50 88C Yildirim et al. (43) presented an approach that estimates 0 92C high shear rate binder viscosity from rotational viscosity 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 measurements for the determination of mixing and com- Shear Stress, Pa paction temperatures. The shear rate of 490 1/s was selected Figure 6. Steady shear viscosity over a range of from experimental work with mixtures compacted in a SGC. shear stresses. The same mixtures were prepared with four different binders and then compacted in the SGC over a range of relatively low temperatures (between 50C and 95C) to amplify the effect of temperature on mix density. It was hypothesized that tures ranging from 76C to 94C (169F to 201F). At high equivalent mix densities would occur when the viscosities of shear stresses, around 500 Pa, the viscosities of modified binders were the same. To find the point where binder vis- binders approach a steady state (i.e., very small change in vis- cosities were the same, the binders were tested in a Brookfield cosity with increasing shear stress). This is illustrated in Fig- viscometer at shear rates ranging from 0.1 1/s to 93 1/s. These ure 6. Using a log-log temperature-viscosity chart, the viscosi- viscosity data were extrapolated to find the shear rate where ties from the 500-Pa shear flow tests are extrapolated out to the unmodified asphalt and the modified asphalts had the 180C (356F). As with unmodified binder using the equivis- same viscosity. The hypothesis was that the shear rate at which cous principle, the recommended mixing temperature is the viscosities of binders intersect is equivalent to the shear based on a viscosity of 0.17 0.02 Pa s. The recommended rate that the mix experiences in the gyratory mold during compaction temperature from the steady shear flow tech- compaction. The average equiviscous shear rate for the eight nique is 0.35 0.03 Pa s, which is higher than the equiviscous pairs of mixtures was 487 1/s, which was rounded to 490 1/s. compaction range of 0.28 0.03 Pa s. Reinke indicated that the The extrapolated viscosity of binders at 490 1/s was referred mixing and compaction temperatures derived from the steady to as the high shear rate viscosity. Using a shear rate of 490 1/s, shear flow method for the few polymer-modified binders eval- the traditional viscosity criteria of 0.17 0.02 Pa s for mix- uated matched well to the temperature ranges successfully ing, and 0.28 0.03 Pa s for compaction, they determined used in practice. mixing and compaction temperatures for the four modified binders to be 10C to 40C (18F to 72F) below the respec- Shear Rate Dependency tive temperatures from AASHTO T 312. This method was criticized on several points (44). One As noted previously, Shenoy (36) proposed a technique of issue with this approach was the use of unrealistically low selecting mixing temperatures based on shear rate dependency compaction temperatures and then using viscosity measure- and other factors. The study included only two polymer- ments at those temperatures to extrapolate viscosity-shear modified asphalts, Styrelf and Novophalt. The binders and rate data. The accuracy of the estimates for viscosities at the a diabase filler were mixed at four temperatures ranging from recommended shear rate of 490 1/s was questioned. At higher 150 to 200C (302 to 392F) and tested in the Brookfield vis- temperatures typical of the range normally used in the labo- cometer with three spindles to generate viscosities over a range ratory, the binders would have exhibited less shear thinning of shear rates. The ratio of viscosities for the filled binder behavior and thus the extrapolations would be different. divided by the unfilled binder showed a pessimum point for the Novophalt around 180C (356F). For the Styrelf, the viscosity ratio was at an apparent minimum around 163C. Steady Shear Flow Shenoy selected the mixing temperature range for the binders Reinke (45) presented another concept, which he called the based on a table of pass/fail criteria for shear-rate dependency, steady shear flow test, to determine mixing and compaction fluidity, Arrhenius plot smoothness, degradation, aging, and temperatures. This approach uses a DSR with a 500-micron viscosity ratio. This yielded mixing temperatures of 180C gap and a 25-mm-diameter plate geometry. The viscosities of (356F) for the Novophalt binder and a range of 163C to binders are tested over a range of shear stresses at tempera- 180C (325F to 356F) for the Styrelf binder.