National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 648: Mixing and Compaction Temperatures of Asphalt Binders in Hot-Mix Asphalt (2010)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Watson, Donald E, West, Randy C, Turner, Pamela A, Casola, John R, Transportation Research Board. "Analysis of Binder Degradation." NCHRP Report 648: Mixing and Compaction Temperatures of Asphalt Binders in Hot-Mix Asphalt. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
37
bottomleft bottomright
Page
37
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-4)
A Note on Units of Viscosity (5-5)
Background on the Development of Mixing and Compaction Temperature Criteria (6-7)
Effect of Temperature on Degradation of Asphalt Binders (8-8)
Mixing and Compaction Temperatures for Modified Asphalt Binders (9-9)
Survey of Current Practices for Determining Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (10-12)
Zero Shear Viscosity (13-13)
Shear Rate Dependency (14-14)
Workability (15-15)
Shear Rates During Mixing and Compaction (16-18)
Summary of Key Findings from the Literature Review (19-19)
Overview of the Experimental Research Plan (20-21)
Organization of the Test Plan (22-22)
Part 2: Mixture Tests (23-23)
Binder Tests (24-29)
Mixture Tests (30-30)
Summary of Research Plan (31-32)
Phase Angle Method (33-33)
SEP Tests (34-36)
Analysis of Binder Degradation (37-42)
Mixture Coating Tests (43-44)
Mixture Coating Tests with Incompletely Dried Aggregate (45-45)
Workability Tests (46-46)
Compaction Tests (47-52)
Indirect Tensile Creep Compliance and Strength (53-58)
Correlation of Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (59-65)
Comparison of SSF and Phase Angle Methods (66-67)
Validation Experiment Results and Analysis (68-71)
Summary of Key Findings (72-72)
Independent Validation (73-73)
Training (74-75)
References (76-77)
Appendix A - Responses of Survey on Agency Specifications Regarding Mixing and Compaction Temperatures (78-83)
Appendix B - Mix Design Data for Base Mix and Other Compaction Experiment Mixes (84-85)
Appendix C - Draft AASHTO Standard for Steady Shear Flow and Phase Angle Methods (86-135)
Appendix D - Statistical Analyses of the Steady Shear Flow and Phase Angle Methods (136-147)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (148-148)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 37
37 1.4 y = 0.0424x + 0.1168 in Figure 22. Note that the y-axis (Jnr) scales of these graphs R2 = 0.5459 are different. For all of the modified binders, the maximum Jnr 1.2 was less than 20 1/Pa. However, for the unmodified binders, 1 much of the data was above this level and, in one case (as Mass Loss (%) 130 C shown in Figure 22), exceeded 100 1/Pa. Further analysis of 0.8 150 C these results is provided in the next section. 0.6 170 C 190 C 0.4 Analysis of Binder Degradation 0.2 Four binder characteristics were examined for evidence of binder degradation due to exposure to high temperatures: 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 · Changes in the true grade critical high temperature of the Opacity (%) binders; Figure 20. Comparison of mass loss and opacity data. · Changes in the true grade critical low temperature of the binders; · Changes in the phase angle of the binders at their respec- Results of Re-Graded Binders tive grade temperatures; and Binder grading results for the original binder materials and · Changes in the MSCR non-recoverable creep compliance. the residues from the SEP tests are shown in Table 14. True grades for the samples are shown based on the critical low Table 16 shows the change in the critical high temperatures, that is, the change in critical high temperature from the origi- temperatures determined from the bending beam rheometer nal, unaged binder to the re-graded binder after SEP condition- (BBR) test and the direct tension test (DTT). Also shown are ing at each temperature (i.e., SEP residue Tc - Original Tc). The the phase angles for each binder at the high PG temperature. data show that the critical high temperatures increased with These results are discussed in a later section regarding analy- higher SEP temperatures. Increases in high temperature grades sis of binder degradation. are considered beneficial to rutting resistance. This trend is expected since exposure to high temperatures increases molec- MSCR Tests ular size through oxidation and polymerization and therefore stiffens the binders. The three binders with the greatest increase Table 15 is a summary of the results from the MSCR tests. in the critical high temperature were I, O, and H. The high tem- The information shown in this table is the non-recoverable perature grade for the air-blown Binder I changed the most creep compliance results that indicate the degree to which a with a two-grade increase. Those that changed the least were binder recovers shear strains resulting from a range of stresses. unmodified Binder K and modified Binder C, with an increase Binders that are modified with elastomeric polymers will typ- in critical high temperature of 4.6°C and 4.4°C, respectively. ically exhibit a high degree of recovery or, inversely, have very Although there are differences among the binders in the mag- low values of non-recoverable compliance. Following the nitude of change of the high temperature grade due to the SEP AASHTO TP 70 protocol, binders are normally tested after conditioning, there is no evidence of binder degradation from rolling-thin-film oven (RTFO) conditioning at the binder's this data. high PG temperature. However, initial MSCR tests on RTFO- Table 17 shows the change in the critical low temperature for aged samples after the SEP procedure showed that the RTFO the binders. For most binders, the critical low temperature aging masked the effects of the SEP tests. Therefore, no after the SEP testing was based on the DTT. Overall, the low RTFO conditioning was performed on the SEP-conditioned critical temperatures typically increased several degrees from binders to better assess the effects of the SEP temperatures the original binders, but not enough to change the grade for on the binders. For this study, the binders were tested after most binders. This indicates that pavements with these binders four temperatures (58°C, 64°C, 70°C, and 76°C) in the SEP would be only slightly more likely to experience thermal crack- test. MSCR tests were conducted on the original and SEP ing after exposure to the temperatures in the SEP test. Binders conditioned binder samples. Results are reported as non- that had the greatest increase in critical low temperature were recoverable creep compliance, Jnr, at two standard levels of I, J, N and O. Of these, J, N, and O barely had a one-grade stress, 100 and 3200 Pa. change at the low temperature end; Binder I did not change Example plots of the change in Jnr with increasing test low temperature grade. There was no general trend of increas- temperature and SEP conditioning are shown in Figures 21 ing critical low temperature with higher temperatures, and and 22. Results for a modified Binder, H, are shown in Fig- most modified binders increased slightly less than the ure 21, and the results of an unmodified Binder, E, are shown unmodified binders. Therefore, there is no strong evidence of

OCR for page 38
38 Table 14. Results of grading of binders before and after SEP testing. SEP Test Temperature, °C Binder Test Original 130 150 170 190 Original DSR 85.4 91.7 89.6 92.1 95.6 Phase Angle @ 82°C 65.8 64.1 65.2 65.8 62.4 RTFO DSR 65.8 64.1 65.2 65.8 62.4 PAV DSR 24.1 23.0 25.4 26.7 26.9 M BBR Stiffness -26.4 -27.3 -26.1 -28.7 -27.7 BBR m-value -19.5 -17.7 -16.4 -17.3 -17.3 DTT -24.8 -17.7 -17.3 -19.6 -21.5 True Grade - BBR 85.4 -19.5 88.4 -17.7 89.6 -16.4 90.8 -17.3 92.2 -17.3 True Grade - DTT 85.4 -24.8 88.4 -17.7 89.6 -17.3 90.8 -19.6 92.2 -21.5 Original DSR 96.6 88.9 94.6 98.7 97.7 Phase Angle @ 82°C 70.0 69.6 71.4 66.5 66.1 RTFO DSR 84.3 83.0 85.7 88.9 91.0 PAV DSR 15.0 25.7 23.2 20.2 24.3 N BBR Stiffness -33.1 -23.5 -24.4 -30.0 -30.5 BBR m-value -25.5 -22.3 -24.1 -23.8 -27.0 DTT -27.8 -18.4 -20.3 -20.5 -20.8 True Grade - BBR 84.3 -25.5 83.0 -22.3 85.7 -24.1 88.9 -23.8 91.0 -19.5 True Grade - DTT 84.3 -27.8 83.0 -18.4 85.7 -20.3 88.9 -20.5 91.0 -20.8 Original DSR 82.5 89.9 90.6 90.4 89.9 Phase Angle @ 76°C 67.1 64.0 63.3 61.8 63.1 RTFO DSR 85.5 94.3* 87.9 88.7 89.8 PAV DSR 20.3 22.5 22.2 18.6 20.9 G BBR Stiffness -27.1 ° -27.2 -25.8 -28.1 -26.7 BBR m-value -24.2 -24.3 -23.4 -23.5 -22.3 DTT -25.6 -23.9 -22.3 -24.3 -21.2 True Grade - BBR 82.5 -24.2 89.9 -24.3 87.9 -23.4 88.7 -23.5 89.8 -22.3 True Grade - DTT 82.5 -25.6 89.9 -23.9 87.9 -22.3 88.7 -24.3 89.8 -21.2 Original DSR 78.7 81.5 85.9 86.3 88.4 Phase Angle @ 76°C 72.3 70.2 68.4 67.7 66.7 RTFO DSR 78.3 82.3 79.7 75.3 88.0 PAV DSR 20.3 22.0 22.7 25.3 26.3 H BBR Stiffness -27.9 -28.0 -26.9 -26.8 -27.3 BBR m-value -27.7 -28.0 -27.3 -26.0 -26.4 DTT -26.1 -23.7 -22.4 -21.0 -22.7 True Grade - BBR 78.3 -27.7 81.5 -28.0 79.7 -26.9 86.3 -26.0 88.0 -26.4 True Grade - DTT 78.3 -26.1 81.5 -23.7 79.7 -22.4 86.3 -21.0 88.0 -22.7 Original DSR 77.8 79.3 85.3 80.0 91.3 Phase Angle @ 70°C 62.4 64.0 63.6 63.3 57.2 RTFO DSR 75.1 76.2 76.6 77.9 79.5 PAV DSR 6.7 6.7 9.0 7.0 12.6 C BBR Stiffness -39.6 -39.0 -41.0 -42.7 -41.0 BBR m-value -38.9 -38.1 -38.1 -40.3 -38.1 DTT -34.9 -36.8 -36.1 -37.7 -28.2 True Grade - BBR 75.1 -38.9 76.2 -38.1 76.6 -38.1 77.9 -40.3 79.5 -38.1 True Grade - DTT 75.1 -34.9 76.2 -36.8 76.6 -36.1 77.9 -37.7 79.5 -28.2 Original DSR 71.8 77.3 76.5 81.9 84.6 Phase Angle @ 70°C 80.2 78.2 77.8 74.8 73.4 RTFO DSR 74.8 78.3 79.9 80.6 83.9 PAV DSR 17.5 20.1 18.9 22.1 22.6 I BBR Stiffness -34.8 -33.9 -39.0 -30.8 -35.9 BBR m-value -29.2 -28.3 -27.8 -28.0 -23.3 DTT -25.8 -27.0 -25.4 -23.8 -23.2 True Grade - BBR 71.8 -29.2 77.3 -28.3 76.5 -27.8 80.6 -28.0 83.9 -23.3 True Grade - DTT 71.8 -25.8 77.3 -27.0 76.5 -25.4 80.6 -23.8 83.9 -23.2

OCR for page 39
39 Table 14. (Continued). Original DSR 69.3 72.8 72.6 74.4 75.7 Phase Angle @ 64°C 71.8 68.7 68.9 67.1 65.6 RTFO DSR 69.8 71.1 71.6 72.4 74.5 PAV DSR 10.4 10.9 10.9 11.1 12.4 B BBR Stiffness -37.3 -37.8 -38.5 -38.5 -38.3 BBR m-value -37.9 -37.7 -36.5 -36.2 -36.6 DTT -34.1 -34.9 -35.1 -33.0 -34.1 True Grade - BBR 69.3 -37.3 71.1 -37.7 71.6 -36.5 72.4 -36.2 74.5 -36.6 True Grade - DTT 69.3 -34.1 71.1 -34.9 71.6 -35.1 72.4 -33.0 74.5 -34.1 Original DSR 68.4 71.6 72.4 74.3 73.6 Phase Angle @ 64°C 83.5 85.4 85.2 83.6 83.6 RTFO DSR 67.8 70.2 71.1 76.5 74.3 PAV DSR 30.5 31.5 25.4 26.0 33.1 F BBR Stiffness -24.9 -23.4 -24.0 -23.6 -23.9 BBR m-value -23.5 -22.8 -22.7 -25.0 -22.2 DTT -21.3 -18.7 -18.2 -15.9 -18.5 True Grade - BBR 67.8 -23.5 70.2 -22.8 71.1 -22.7 74.3 -14.1 73.6 -22.2 True Grade - DTT 67.8 -21.3 70.2 -18.7 71.1 -18.2 74.3 -15.9 73.6 -18.5 Original DSR 65.6 69.1 70.2 74.1 76.0 Phase Angle @ 64°C 79.2 83.5 82.9 80.3 78.8 RTFO DSR 68.2 70.5 71.0 73.6 77.7 PAV DSR 19.2 20.1 20.6 20.2 22.1 O BBR Stiffness -29.7 -27.9 -28.0 -27.7 -27.3 BBR m-value -30.1 -27.5 -27.5 -27.5 -26.8 DTT -30.2 -23.8 -23.6 -22.8 -22.0 True Grade - BBR 65.6 -29.7 69.1 -27.5 70.2 -27.5 73.6 -27.5 76.0 -26.8 True Grade - DTT 65.6 -30.2 69.1 -23.8 70.2 -23.6 73.6 -22.8 76.0 -22.0 Original DSR 66.1 68.9 69.8 70.8 71.3 Phase Angle @ 64°C 89.1 88.0 86.7 88.1 88.3 RTFO DSR 65.3 67.1 67.3 68.3 69.9 PAV DSR 32.4 32.1 32.2 32.3 33.7 K BBR Stiffness -13.0 -11.6 -13.8 -11.7 -11.0 BBR m-value -15.8 -15.8 -15.8 -15.0 -14.1 DTT -14.5 -9.0 -12.0 -10.9 -11.5 True Grade - BBR 65.3 -13.0 67.1 -11.6 67.3 -13.8 68.3 -11.7 69.9 -11.0 True Grade - DTT 65.3 -14.5 67.1 -9.0 67.3 -12.0 68.3 -10.9 69.9 -11.5 Original DSR 64.3 69.1 71.6 72.0 74.8 Phase Angle @ 64°C 89.4 86.9 88.4 88.2 86.6 RTFO DSR 64.7 69.2 69.4 71.2 72.4 PAV DSR 27.0 31.1 27.9 29.1 30.0 J BBR Stiffness -21.2 -19.0 -23.9 -22.2 -29.8 BBR m-value -20.7 -19.7 -21.2 -20.5 -19.5 DTT -21.0 -14.3 -14.5 -13.6 -13.4 True Grade - BBR 64.3 -20.7 69.1 -19.0 69.4 -21.2 71.2 -20.5 72.4 -19.5 True Grade - DTT 64.3 -21.0 69.1 -14.3 69.4 -14.5 71.2 -13.6 72.4 -13.4 Original DSR 63.2 62.8 63.4 66.0 69.5 Phase Angle @ 58°C 83.0 82.7 82.4 81.1 78.6 RTFO DSR 60.9 63.9 65.6 65.9 71.3 PAV DSR 13.2 13.0 12.7 14.9 14.3 E BBR Stiffness -36.7 -35.2 -35.1 -34.8 -35.0 BBR m-value -33.1 -35.2 -32.5 -34.4 -31.2 DTT -34.7 -30.6 -29.4 -30.0 -29.2 True Grade - BBR 60.9 -33.1 62.8 -32.5 63.4 -32.5 65.9 -34.4 69.5 -31.2 True Grade - DTT 60.9 -34.7 62.8 -30.6 63.4 -29.4 65.9 -30.0 69.5 -29.2 Original DSR 60.3 62.4 64.8 65.2 67.6 Phase Angle @ 58°C 86.7 85.5 84.3 84.0 83.1 RTFO DSR 61.5 62.7 63.2 64.7 65.9 PAV DSR 15.5 15.2 14.8 15.1 15.1 D BBR Stiffness -31.7 -32.3 -31.8 -32.4 -31.1 BBR m-value -32.5 -33.1 -29.6 -31.9 -32.7 DTT -26.0 -29.2 -29.4 -29.0 -28.7 True Grade - BBR 60.3 -31.7 62.4 -32.3 63.2 -29.6 64.7 -31.9 65.9 -31.1 True Grade - DTT 60.3 -26.0 62.4 -29.2 63.2 -29.4 64.7 -29.0 65.9 -28.7

OCR for page 40
40 Table 15. Summary of non-recoverable creep compliance (Jnr, 1/Pa) results from the MSCR tests. Binder Temp, 100 Pa Stress 3200 Pa Stress o ID C Unaged 130 150 170 190 Unaged 130 150 170 190 58 0.0500 0.0474 0.3260 0.1727 0.0801 0.1000 0.1385 0.1326 0.1034 0.0685 64 0.0790 0.0906 0.1581 0.3835 0.0677 0.3200 0.2146 0.4109 0.3815 0.1955 M 70 0.1200 0.2653 0.5203 0.7644 0.4954 1.1600 0.9883 1.2364 1.0724 0.7160 76 0.1900 1.2122 2.9427 1.8101 0.8002 4.3400 3.5709 3.7888 3.2963 2.2566 58 0.0700 0.1168 0.0626 0.0898 0.0830 0.1000 0.1721 0.1075 0.0752 0.0650 64 0.1400 0.2719 0.1100 0.2053 0.4125 0.2600 0.4889 0.2553 0.2035 0.2313 N 70 0.3200 1.6612 0.4064 0.1997 1.8000 0.8100 3.2819 0.5446 0.4046 0.9200 76 0.6400 1.3371 0.1698 1.2114 3.8847 2.5100 4.2000 3.4903 1.0648 2.3238 58 0.1212 0.6695 0.9805 0.1026 0.0795 0.1380 0.1643 0.2130 0.0738 0.0892 64 0.2216 0.2820 0.4007 0.2440 0.0710 0.2766 0.2127 0.3105 0.2366 0.1446 G 70 0.3761 0.4049 0.6539 0.5106 0.5207 0.5261 0.5818 0.7040 0.4514 0.4505 76 0.6632 1.5013 0.9277 0.7518 0.6698 1.3357 1.2024 1.8758 1.3503 0.9594 58 0.4600 0.6478 0.4793 0.2325 0.2693 0.5900 0.3988 0.2392 0.2360 0.2935 64 1.0500 1.0481 1.0372 0.5652 0.8394 1.5800 0.8867 0.7175 0.6685 0.5154 H 70 2.6800 0.6555 2.2746 1.5635 0.7825 4.5700 2.2220 1.7273 2.0313 1.1710 76 5.7200 3.8550 4.2959 3.4807 2.0714 10.4800 5.4825 5.1347 5.2013 3.2522 58 1.0137 0.9253 0.3740 0.2232 0.2759 1.0075 0.5853 0.3754 0.3605 0.2803 64 0.3326 1.2603 0.7737 0.9677 0.4490 1.7533 1.3344 1.1739 1.8443 0.7928 C 70 0.3690 2.8768 2.1784 2.2559 1.8240 5.5538 4.8275 3.5356 3.9806 2.5025 76 5.4942 7.1843 4.3437 4.5098 2.7163 13.2738 12.5172 7.7141 11.6331 7.5678 58 2.4612 1.2553 1.0379 0.5284 0.0386 2.8189 1.0503 1.2532 0.7221 0.4895 64 3.6981 2.2093 1.6739 0.9204 0.1364 5.8972 2.9856 2.5595 1.6446 1.4043 I 70 14.5110 4.8845 4.4979 2.8155 1.7774 15.4491 7.3369 7.4084 4.8200 2.9999 76 17.6200 11.6020 6.4407 1.7802 9.4055 27.6559 16.3003 14.7119 8.3325 10.0338 58 1.1572 1.4219 0.2614 0.7081 0.6351 2.3519 0.9589 0.7046 0.7697 0.7519 64 2.5669 0.3968 0.9438 1.2274 1.5359 6.6602 2.7654 2.6778 1.8109 2.3599 B 70 6.4338 1.5680 2.0909 3.5332 3.8034 16.4549 6.7619 5.0541 5.5288 6.5341 76 18.4670 3.5533 6.7418 5.7535 0.3094 34.8406 12.4888 11.9631 10.7913 11.4966 58 2.9939 1.1228 2.2369 1.5380 2.1366 3.5428 2.7608 2.7867 2.5458 2.5664 64 7.1896 6.1727 5.6663 3.7491 4.5189 8.6328 7.5444 6.9656 6.0781 5.8350 F 70 15.5393 13.3200 12.2410 9.0157 10.6770 18.7640 16.4963 15.0584 12.9425 13.4653 76 32.0430 27.0610 24.8970 23.0810 23.8840 38.9281 33.0313 30.3894 30.4113 27.9788 58 6.0360 3.5217 2.8005 1.1717 0.4555 5.6938 4.5128 3.6350 2.3061 1.9970 64 10.3100 7.2912 2.4976 2.9879 2.0882 12.2366 10.3097 7.4744 5.7025 4.6595 O 70 21.7490 14.6570 12.8270 8.1640 2.7960 28.1559 22.5944 17.2275 13.2616 11.6398 76 27.2230 27.5810 24.8370 18.0570 8.1853 40.2125 41.9750 32.6094 25.0438 19.3758 58 4.8934 3.6084 1.8297 0.4587 1.6453 5.7784 4.4663 4.2838 3.3775 2.6775 64 10.9300 5.4157 4.8001 6.5832 3.4524 12.1772 9.5750 9.9984 9.2616 6.8888 K 70 22.3350 17.0770 16.5430 15.0000 13.2470 32.8875 24.7503 24.4169 21.0691 17.9931 76 35.2620 41.5150 34.8630 13.1870 14.8320 59.6625 53.2031 53.8750 38.6406 35.0313 58 5.4921 3.5265 2.7391 2.4878 0.7402 6.2943 4.5581 4.0203 3.3891 3.2017 64 13.8943 7.1120 6.4143 4.6326 0.6629 16.1071 10.9047 7.8103 7.3150 7.2913 J 70 29.3687 19.7640 11.8350 10.7630 9.2671 34.1458 26.0844 19.8675 16.7050 14.5859 76 58.7047 39.6080 12.1270 25.2900 16.7150 67.6948 51.0125 40.7594 36.2156 35.7234 58 11.3737 7.9921 3.0642 4.3426 2.2957 14.3829 10.7188 7.8388 8.2328 3.9384 64 23.5373 16.9930 13.4830 6.4829 4.7986 29.4433 22.8119 18.1700 15.7816 8.7728 E 70 46.0083 21.6180 22.2620 16.4600 9.0460 57.6240 47.0094 39.0000 27.7828 19.0259 76 92.1573 79.8670 64.1290 38.6380 28.6420 114.3906 92.6563 75.8344 56.0125 39.7531 58 10.1716 3.7658 6.0801 4.0700 4.9074 12.1819 8.7575 8.5525 7.0372 6.3491 64 22.0473 14.0720 10.7090 11.4250 9.5916 26.5592 19.2153 18.1231 12.6216 14.0603 D 70 44.5693 32.5280 23.3700 12.6540 17.1720 53.3438 41.9750 40.8813 30.4881 26.8969 76 83.0037 34.6660 48.3080 47.1410 40.3310 99.6958 45.4875 74.5125 63.8688 56.8281

OCR for page 41
41 Binder H, 3200 Pa Stress 20 18 Unaged 16 SEP 130 14 SEP 150 12 SEP 170 Jnr (1/Pa) SEP 190 10 8 6 4 2 0 52 58 64 70 76 82 Temperature (C) Figure 21. Plot of Jnr for modified Binder H from MSCR tests. Binder E, 3200 Pa Stress 100 Unaged 90 SEP 130 80 SEP 150 SEP 170 70 SEP 190 60 Jnr (1/Pa) 50 40 30 20 10 0 52 58 64 70 76 82 Temperature (C) Figure 22. Plot of Jnr for unmodified Binder E from MSCR tests.

OCR for page 42
42 Table 16. Changes to high temperature grade (°C) Table 18. Changes to Phase Angle (degrees) after SEP test. after SEP tests. SEP Temperature (°C) SEP Temperature (°C) Binder ID True Binder ID True Grade 130 150 170 190 Grade 130 150 170 190 M 85.5 -19.5 3.0 4.2 5.4 6.8 M 85.5 -19.5 -1.73 -0.62 0.05 -3.34 N 84.3 -25.5 -1.3 1.4 4.6 6.7 N 84.3 -25.5 -0.40 1.40 -3.50 -3.90 G 82.5 -24.2 7.4 5.4 6.2 7.3 G 82.5 -24.2 -3.07 -3.76 -5.32 -4.02 H 78.3 -26.1 3.2 1.4 8.0 9.7 H 78.3 -26.1 -2.10 -3.83 -4.57 -5.54 C 75.1 -38.7 1.1 1.5 2.8 4.4 C 75.1 -38.7 1.66 1.18 0.97 -5.21 I 71.8 -29.2 5.5 4.7 8.8 12.1 I 71.8 -29.2 -2.03 -2.44 -5.43 -6.80 B 69.3 -37.3 1.8 2.3 3.1 5.2 B 69.3 -37.3 -3.18 -2.93 -4.73 -6.22 F 67.8 -21.3 2.4 3.3 6.5 5.8 F 67.8 -21.3 1.89 1.70 0.12 0.13 O 65.6 -29.7 3.5 4.6 8.0 10.4 O 65.6 -29.7 4.29 3.67 1.06 -0.42 K 65.3 -13.0 1.8 2.0 3.0 4.6 K 65.3 -13.0 -1.06 -2.40 -1.03 -0.84 J 64.3 -20.7 4.8 5.1 6.9 8.1 J 64.3 -20.7 -2.50 -1.00 -1.20 -2.80 E 60.9 -33.1 1.9 2.5 5.0 8.6 E 60.9 -33.1 -0.31 -0.58 -1.96 -4.45 D 60.3 -31.7 2.1 2.9 4.4 5.6 D 60.3 -31.7 -1.23 -2.35 -2.68 -3.57 Avg. of Modified Binders 2.5 2.7 5.0 6.7 Avg. of Modified Binders -1.5 -1.4 -2.9 -4.7 Avg. of Unmodified Binders 3.1 3.6 6.1 7.9 Avg. of Unmodified Binders -0.1 -0.5 -1.6 -2.7 low temperature degradation due to exposure to higher tem- observed by Airey and Brown (28), had the polymers in the peratures for most binders. modified binders been damaged by the increased tempera- Table 18 shows the change in phase angle as measured in PG tures, the phase angles should have increased, indicating a loss grading of the binders. These data show that generally, phase of elastic behavior. Therefore, the phase angle data indicates angles tend to decrease with increasing SEP temperatures that there are no signs of polymer degradation in the binders. for both modified and unmodified binders. However, a few Figure 23 shows the effect of SEP temperature on non- binders had unusual results. Binders C, F, and O exhibited an recoverable creep compliance, Jnr, for the unmodified binders. initial increase in phase angle at an SEP temperature of 130°C, The data shown in this graph are from the binder high grade then decreased with higher SEP temperatures. A decrease in temperatures and a stress level of 3200 Pa. The trend evident phase angle indicates that the binders became stiffer and more from this chart is that the non-recoverable compliance val- elastic after they were exposed to higher temperatures. As ues decrease with higher SEP temperatures. Conversely, the Table 17. Changes to low temperature grade (°C) after SEP test. 18 SEP Temperature (°C) Binder ID True 130 150 170 190 16 Grade M 85.5 -19.5 1.8 3.1 2.2 2.2 14 N 84.3 -25.5 7.1 5.2 5.0 6.0 12 G 82.5 -24.2 0.3 1.9 0.7 3.0 10 H 78.3 -26.1 2.4 3.7 5.1 3.4 Jnr (1/Pa) 8 C 75.1 -38.7 2.1 2.8 1.2 0.8 6 I 71.8 -29.2 2.2 3.8 5.4 6.0 4 B 69.3 -37.3 -0.4 0.8 1.1 0.7 2 F 67.8 -21.3 2.6 3.1 5.4 2.8 J 0 O 65.6 -29.7 5.9 6.1 6.9 7.7 K K 65.3 -13.0 5.5 2.5 3.6 3.0 D F 0 J 64.3 -20.7 6.7 6.5 7.4 7.6 Binder ID 130 E 150 E 60.9 -33.1 2.5 3.7 3.1 3.9 I 170 D 60.3 -31.7 2.5 2.3 2.7 3.0 O 190 SEP Temp. (C) Avg. of Modified Binders 2.9 2.2 2.7 2.6 Figure 23. MSCR Jnr results at 3200 Pa stress for Avg. of Unmodified Binders 4.0 4.0 4.9 4.9 unmodified binders.