National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 138: Estimating Soft Costs for Major Public Transportation Fixed Guideway Projects (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Art versus Science." TCRP Report 138: Estimating Soft Costs for Major Public Transportation Fixed Guideway Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
18
bottomleft bottomright
Page
18
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Part 1: Guidebook (1-2)
Introduction (3-3)
Chapter 1 - What Are Soft Costs and Why Do They Matter? (4-4)
Chapter 2 - How and Who This Guidebook Helps: Audience and Circumstances (5-5)
Definition of Soft Costs (6-6)
What Are the Components of Soft Costs? (7-7)
Typical versus Less Typical Soft Costs (8-8)
What Soft Costs Are Not: It Depends on Perspective (9-10)
When Does FTA Ask for Soft Cost Estimates? (11-11)
Characteristics of the Federal Process That Affect Soft Costs (12-12)
Federal versus Non-Federal Projects (13-13)
Later Phases (14-15)
How Does This Practice Compare with Actual Costs? (16-17)
Art versus Science (18-18)
Quantifying Soft Costs (19-19)
Four-Step Process (20-24)
Applying These Steps: Two Example Projects (25-29)
Appendix A - FTA Capital Cost Database (30-31)
Appendix B - Soft Cost Estimation Worksheet (32-33)
Appendix C - Glossary (34-36)
Part 2: Final Report (37-39)
S.1. Definition of Soft Costs (40-40)
S.2. Soft Cost Estimation: State of the Practice (41-42)
S.4. A New Approach to Estimate Soft Costs (43-43)
S.5. Future Research Direction (44-44)
1.2. Background (45-45)
1.3. Definition of Soft Costs (46-47)
1.4. Organization of This Report (48-48)
2.1. Papers and Websites (49-49)
2.3. Textbooks and Technical Books (50-50)
2.5. European Sources (51-51)
2.6. Summary and Conclusion (52-52)
3.1. In-Depth Interviews with Professional Cost Estimators (53-54)
3.3. Questionnaire Results: Magnitude of Estimated Soft Costs (55-59)
3.4. Questionnaire Results: Drivers Identified (60-61)
3.5. Questionnaire Results: Impact of Drivers (62-65)
4.2. Data Source: FTA Capital Cost Database (66-67)
4.3. Potential Issues in Soft Cost Categorization (68-69)
4.4. Historical Soft Costs (70-76)
4.5. Relationships between Cost Drivers and Historical Soft Costs (77-87)
5.2. Soft Cost Estimation: State of the Practice (88-88)
5.3. As-Built Cost Analysis (89-89)
5.4. Future Research Directions (90-90)
Bibliography (91-92)
Appendix A - Cost Estimators Interviewed (93-93)
B.1. Data Sources for Project Descriptions (94-94)
B.2. Project Descriptions (95-107)
C.2. Adjustments Addressing Different Cost Categorization (108-108)
C.5. Vehicle Soft Costs (109-109)
C.6. Soft Costs by Mode and Year (110-112)
C.7. Soft Costs by Complexity: Overall Project Size (113-116)
C.8. Soft Costs by Complexity: New versus Extension (117-118)
C.9. Soft Costs by Complexity: Percentage of Guideway Not at Grade (119-120)
C.10. Soft Costs by Complexity: Percentage of Guideway Below Grade (121-122)
C.11. Relationships Among Other Category Unit Costs (123-124)
C.13. Soft Costs and Project Development Budget (125-126)
C.14. Soft Costs and Project Development Schedule (127-129)
C.15. Vertical Profile and Soft Cost Measurement (130-130)
C.16. Isolating Agency-Specific Effects (131-134)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (135-135)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
CHAPTER 6 How to Estimate Soft Costs for a New Project This Guidebook presents a new method, firmly rooted in historical experience, for estimating soft costs for a planned transit project. This section demonstrates a step-by-step process to estimate the relationship between hard costs and soft costs of a given transit project, based on certain known characteristics about the project and its sponsor. What This Method Is for and When to Use It It is important to note the kinds of projects this method is designed for: · Heavy and light rail. This method was developed based on actual historical costs for heavy and light rail projects, with only limited data for commuter rail and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects. Therefore, the following mathematical steps should not be applied to other public transportation capital infrastructure projects, such as commuter rail or BRT projects. · A project in early, conceptual phases. This method is best applicable to projects in early planning phases, approximately until the project has completed an environmental impact statement. After that time, more defined information is likely available for a more bottom-up estimate tailored to the project. This Guidebook's process can then offer a "test of reasonableness" on the detailed, bottom-up estimate. Art versus Science Just as a homeowner cannot tell precisely how much an architect will charge for designing a new kitchen until the kind of remodeling desired is determined, a transit agency cannot tell exactly how much its hard and soft costs will be until the project is defined down to the last turnstile. In addition, every new rail construction project will be slightly different from the last and will encounter unforeseen events along the way, making it impossible to estimate future costs based on historical costs with absolute precision. Therefore, soft cost estimation must blend art with science. Part of a soft cost estimate can be built up in a fairly objective and numerical way by relying on past experience and the known relationships between a project's characteristics and historical costs, and this methodology applies such relationships. For example, a statistical analysis of historical costs demonstrates that heavy rail incurs higher soft costs as a percentage of construction cost--about 6% more (as demonstrated later in Exhibit 27), all other things being equal, so cost estimators can comfortably adjust their figures accordingly. Still another part of an estimate can be generated based on known cost relationships, using some judgment about the project and its context. For instance, history shows that an unusually 20