National Academies Press: OpenBook

Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes (2010)

Chapter: References

« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14389.
×
Page 96
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14389.
×
Page 97

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

96 Adkins et al., Value of Time Savings of Commercial Vehicles, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1967. Adelakun, A. A., Simulating Truck Lane Management Approaches to Improve Efficiency and Safety of Highways in Knoxville, Tennessee, Master of Science thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, December 2008. Anderson, R. M., D. Walker, J. A. Scherocman, and L. E. Epley, Kentucky’s Experience with Large Size Aggregate in Bituminous Hot Mix, Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 60, Seattle, Washing- ton, 1991. Button, Joe W., Emmanuel G. Fernando, and Dan R. Middleton, Synthesis of Pavement Issues Related to High-Speed Corridors, Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 0-4756-1, September 2004. Center for Urban Transportation Research, The Potential for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways in Florida, Research Report 21-17-422-LO, May 2002. Chicago Department of Transportation, Mid-City Freightway, Evaluation of Alternative Alignments and Tolls, November 2006. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Section 658.23. Cothron, A. Scott, Douglas A. Skowronek, and Beverly T. Kuhn, Enforcement Issues on Managed Lanes, Texas Transportation Institute, January 2003. David, J. and Jim March, “Issues in the Financing of Truck-Only Lanes,” Forkenbrock, Public Roads, September 2005. Dorothy, Paul W., The Potential for Exclusive Truck Facilities in Ohio as presented at Ohio Transportation Engineer- ing Conference, 2007. Douglas, James G., Handbook for Planning Truck Facilities on Urban Highways, August 2004. FHWA, Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity Within Selected Crash Geometries, FHWA-HRT-05-051, October 2005. FHWA, Technological Challenges and Policy Implications for LCVs on Exclusive Truck Facilities, I-90 Gap Closing Scenario, Draft Evaluation Results. Georgia Department of Transportation, Truck Only Lane Needs Analysis and Engineering Assessment, April 2008. Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority, Truck Only Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region/Atlanta TOT Facilities Study, July 2005. Gilroy, Leonard C., Robert W. Poole, Jr., Peter Samuel, and Geoffrey Segal, Building New Roads Through Public- Private Partnerships: Frequently Asked Questions, Reason Foundation Policy Brief No. 58. Holguin Veras, Jose, David Sackey, Sajjad Hussein, Victor Ochieng, On the Economic and Financial Feasibility of Toll Truckways, TRB 2003 Annual Meeting. HNTB and Wilbur Smith Associates, I-35 Trade Corridor Study, Recommended Corridor Investment Strate- gies, Texas Department of Transportation, September 1999. Hsing-Chung Chu, Implementing Truck-Only Toll Lanes at the State, Regional, and Corridor Levels: Development of a Planning Methodology, Georgia Institute of Technology, December 2007. Indiana Department of Transportation, I-70 Corridor of the Future Phase II Application, 2007. Kawamura, Kazuya, Commercial Vehicle Value of Time and Perceived Benefit of Congestion Pricing, University of California Berkeley, PhD Dissertation, 1999. Leachman, R. C., et al., Port and Modal Elasticity Study, Southern California Association of Governments, Sep- tember 2005 (http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/People/Faculty/leachman-pubs/PortModal.pdf). Los Angeles County MTA, I-710 Major Corridor Study Final Report, March 2005. Mahboub, K., and E. G. Williams, “Construction of Large-Stone Asphalt Mixes (LSAMs) in Kentucky,” Transporta- tion Research Record 1282, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1990, pp. 41–44. Mason, J. M., Middleton D. R., and Petersen H. C., Operational and Geometric Evaluation of Exclusive Truck Lanes, Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 331-3F. pp. 18–23, May 1986. References

McDevitt, C. F., “Basics of Concrete Barriers,” Public Roads, March 2000. Middleton, Dan, Steve Venglar, Cesar Quiroga, Dominique Lord, and Debbie Jasek, Strategies for Separating Trucks from Passenger Vehicles: Final Report, Research Report 0-4663-2, September 2006. Middleton, Dan, Truck Accommodation Design Guidance: Policy Maker Workshop, Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 4364-3, October 2003. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglass, Inc., Truck Only Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region, July 2005. Poole, Robert W., Jr. and Peter Samuel, Corridors for Toll Truckways: Suggested Locations for Pilot Projects, Policy Study 316, Reason Foundation, February 2004. Poole, Robert W., Jr. and Peter Samuel, Toll Truckways: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement, PowerPoint Presentation. Poole, Robert W., Jr., Miami Toll Truckway: Preliminary Feasibility Study, Reason Foundation, Policy Study 365, November 2007. Poole, Robert W., Jr., Reducing Congestion in Atlanta: A Bold New Approach to Increasing Mobility, Reason Foun- dation and Georgia Public Policy Foundation, Policy Study 351, November 2006. Poole, Robert W., Jr., Safeguarding and Modernizing America’s Highway Infrastructure, Reason Foundation, PowerPoint Presentation. Poole, Robert W., Jr., The Private Sector’s Growing Role in Highway Infrastructure, Reason Foundation Presentation to the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, October 2006. Reich, Stephen, Janet Davis, Martin Catala, Anthony Ferraro, and Sisinnio Concas, The Potential for Reserved Truck Lanes and Truckways in Florida, Center for Urban Transportation Research, Research Report 21-17-422-LO, May 2002. Samuel, Peter, Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Jose Holguin Veras, Toll Truckways: A New Path Toward Safer and More Efficient Freight Transportation, Reason Foundation, Policy Study 294, June 2002. Shladover, Steven E., Advanced Vehicle Technologies and Exclusive Truck Lanes: Research from California PATH Program, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January 2006. Shladover, Steven E., Improving Freight Movement by Using Automated Trucks on Dedicated Truck Lanes: A Chicago Case Study, California PATH Intellimotion, Volume 12, No. 2, 2006. Smalkoski, Brian, and Levinson, D. (2005), Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Operators, Journal of the Trans- portation Research Forum 44:1 89–102. Southern California Association of Governments, Goods Movement in Southern California: The Challenge, the Opportunity, and the Solution, September 2005. Southern California Association of Governments, I-15 Comprehensive Corridor Study, SCAG, December 2005. Southern California Association of Governments, SR 60 Truck Lane Feasibility Study Final Report, February 2001. Texas Department of Transportation/I-35 Steering Committee, I-35 Trade Corridor Study—Recommended Corridor Investment Strategies, September 1999. Texas Transportation Institute, The Feasibility of Exclusive Truck Lanes for the Houston-Beaumont Corridor, Research Report 393-3F, pp. 72–76, March 1987. Thompson, M., F. Gomez-Ramirez, and M. Bejarano, ILLI-PAVE Based Flexible Pavement Design Concepts for Multiple Wheel Heavy Gear Load Aircraft, Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 2002. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004 Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance, U.S. Department of Transportation, Report to Congress (www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2004cpr). U.S. Department of Transportation, Western Uniformity Scenario Analysis: A Regional Truck Size and Weight Sce- nario Requested by the Western Governors’ Association, April 2004. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Highway Finance: State’s Expanding Use of Tolling Illustrates Diverse Challenges and Strategies, U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report to Congressional Requesters, June 2006 (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06554.pdf). VanderWerf, Joel, Steven Shladover, and Mark A. Miller, Conceptual Development and Performance Assessment for the Deployment Staging of Advanced Vehicle Control and Safety Systems, California PATH, 2004. VDOT, I-81 Corridor Improvement Study, Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 2005. Woudsma, C., T. Litman, and G. Weisbrod, A Report on the Estimation of Unit Values of Land Occupied by Trans- portation Infrastructures in Canada, Transport Canada, 2006. Yin, Yafeng, Mark A. Miller, and Steven E. Shladover, Assessment of the Applicability of Cooperative Vehicle- Highway Automation Systems to Freight Movement in Chicago, Transportation Research Board Annual Meet- ing, January 2004. References 97

Next: Appendices »
Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes Get This Book
×
 Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP) have jointly released NCHRP Report 649/NCFRP Report 3: Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes. The report examines major issues and concepts that should be understood in developing new applications of commercial motor vehicle-only (CMV-only) lanes as a potential method for both easing congestion and reducing the number of traffic accidents on highways.

Appendices A through D for NCHRP Report 649/NCFRP Report 3 are available online as follows:

  • Appendix A: NCHRP Project 03-73 Separation of Vehicles—CMV-Only Lanes Task 7—Interim Report
  • Appendix B: Performance Evaluation
  • Appendix C: Benefits Monetization Factors and Unit Costs
  • Appendix D: Net Present Value Calculations for Benefit-Cost Analysis

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!