Click for next page ( 44


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 43
43 APPENDIX A Bibliography I/D Systems Problems. Construction Research Congress: Broadening Perspec- tives, ASCE, 2005, pp. 419423. Abu-Hijleh, S. F., and Ibbs, C.W. Schedule-Based Construction Incentives. Theberge, P. Construction Management Aspects of Florida DOT's Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 115, No. 3, Innovative and Alternative Contracting Procedures. Presented 1989, pp. 430443. at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Anderson, S., and Russell, J.S. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for Washington, DC, 1998. Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best-Value Contracting. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001. Arditi, D., Khisty, C. J., and Yasamis, F. Incentive/Disincentive Provisions I/D and Liquidated Damages Rates in Highway Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Allen, R. K. Estimation of Construction Contract Liquidated Damages. Management, Vol. 123, No. 3, 1997, pp. 302307. Cox, D.O., Molenaar, K.R., Ernzen, J.J., Henk, G., Matthews, T.C., Civil Engineering Practice, 10(1), 1995, p. 7. Smith, N., Williams, R.C., Gee, F., Kolb, J., Sanderson, L., Whited, Finch, O. F. Legal Implications in the Use of Penalty and Bonus Provisions G.C., Wight, J.W., and Yakowenko, G. Contract Administration: of Highway Construction Contracts: The Use of Incentive and Dis- Technology and Practice in Europe. FHWA-PL-02-0xx, 2002. incentive Clauses as Liquidated Damages for Quality Control and Curry, D. A. Use of Marginal Cost of Time in Highway Economy Studies. for Early Completion. Selected Studies in Highway Law, 1582-N63- Highway Research Record 77. HRB, National Research Council, 1582-N89, Vol. 3, 1988. Washington, DC, 1965, pp. 48120. Loulakis, M.C., and Mclaughlin, L.P. Enforcing Liquidated Damages: Haney, D. G. Use of Two Concepts of the Value of Time. Highway How Much Is Too Much? Civil Engineering, Vol. 74, No. 9, 2004, Research Record 12. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, p. 96. DC, 1963, pp. 119. McCormick, C.R. Make Liquidated Damages Work. AACE Inter- Ibarra, C. Strategies Used by State DOTs to Accelerate Highway Con- national--Transactions of the Annual Meeting, CDR151-CDR157, struction Projects. 2002 Mentors Program. Papers on Advanced Orlando, FL, 2003. Surface Transportation Systems, pp. 83125. Jaafari, A. Twinning Time and Cost in Incentive-Based Contracts. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1996, pp. 6272. A B National Asphalt Pavement Association. HMA Visions 2005 and Beyond: California Department of Transportation. Work Plan Special Experimen- Construction and Contracting Practices. Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, tal Project #14 Innovative Contracting Techniques Cost-Plus-Time Vol. 10, No. 6, 2005, p. 9. (A+B) Bidding Method. Sacramento, CA, 1994. Umachigi, S. Highway Construction: Improved Procedures to Overcome Ellis, R. D., and Herbsman, Z. J. Cost-Time Bidding Concept: An Challenges and Limitations. M.S. thesis, The State University of Innovative Approach. Transportation Research Record 1282, TRB, New York at Buffalo, 2005. National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1990, pp. 8994. Viljoen, P.S. Incentive Management Techniques for Pavement Rehabil- Herbsman, Z. J. A+B Bidding Method-Hidden Success Story for Highway itation Construction. PhD dissertation, University of California, Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Berkeley, 1981. Vol. 121, No. 4, 1995, pp. 430437. Jones, L., and Vargas, R. A+B Contracting. California Department of I/D Factors and Issues Transportation Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2002, pp. 2225. Kent, D. Making Work Zones Work Better: Innovations in Technolo- Coburn, W.B. Communication on Construction Projects: Process for gies, Practices, and Products Workshop; Innovative Contracting Field Decision Making. Construction Directive Memorandum. Techniques That Consider Driver Impacts: Use of A+B Bidding. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation. Rich- Springfield, IL, 2003 (http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/workshops/ mond, VA, 2004. accessbile/Kent_MWZWB.htm). Kashiwagi, D., Sullivan, K., Greenwood, D., Kovell, J., and Egbu, C. Petring, J., and Helgeson, B. A+B Process Review Report. Albuquerque, Source of Construction Industry Instability and Performance NM, 1999.

OCR for page 43
44 Lane Rental Transportation Center, KTC-02-07/SPR197-99 & SPR218-00-1F. Lexington, 2002. Gaj, S. J. Lane Rental: An Innovative Contracting Practice. TR News, Ryan, J. T., and Carson, J. Valuation of Temporary Transportation No. 162, 1992, pp. 79. Facility Use Losses. Research Bureau--Montana Department of Herbsman, Z., Glagola, J., and Charles, R. Lane Rental--Innovative Transportation, FHWA/MT-02-005/8117-16, Helena, 2002. Way to Reduce Road Construction Time. Journal of Construction Scott, S., Harris, R.A., and Greenwood, D. Assessing the New United Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 411417. Kingdom Protocol for Dealing with Delay and Disruption. Journal Kent, D. Lane Rental Status Report and Issues. NYSDOT Memorandum, of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 130, April 8, 1997. No. 1, 2004, pp. 5059. Trimels, K.A. Lane Rental in Wyoming. Wyoming Department of Strong, K. 2006. Performance Effectiveness of Design-Build, Lane Transportation, Cheyenne, 2000. Rental, and A+B Contracting Techniques. Minnesota Department of Transportation. MN/RC-2006-09, St. Paul, 2006. Strong, K.C., Tometich, J., and Raadt, N. Cost Effectiveness of Design- Evaluation of I/D Projects Build, Lane Rental, and A+B Contracting Techniques. Proc., 2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, Iowa, Bierbaum, R.R. Incentive/Disincentive Clauses: Do They Accelerate 2005. Highway Construction Projects in Iowa? Creative Component for Matters of Science in Transportation Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, 1991. Road User Cost California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Summary Initial Report for A+B Pile Contracts: 06-354503, British Columbia Ministry of Transportation. MicroBENCOST Guide- 09-211504, and 11-085974. Sacramento, CA, 1993. book: Guidelines for the Benefit Cost Analysis of Highway Projects Carpenter, B., Fekpe, E., and Gopalakrishna, D. Performance-Based in British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada, 2005. Contracting for the Highway Construction Industry: An Evaluation Buffington, J. L, Chui, M. K., and Memmot, J. L. Effects of Freeway of the Use of Innovative Contracting and Performance Specification Stage Construction on Nearby Land Uses and Vehicle User Costs. in Highway Construction. Report submitted to Koch Industries, Transportation Research Record 1046, TRB, National Research Inc., 2003. Council, Washington, DC, 1985, pp. 6269. Christiansen, D.L. An Analysis of the Use of Incentive/Disincentive Carr, R. I. Construction Congestion (CO3) Basic Model. Journal of Contracting Provisions for Early Project Completion. In Special Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 2, 2000. Report 212: Transportation Management for Major Highway Recon- pp. 105113. struction, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, Cervarich, M. B. Timing Delays Like Relays: State DOTs Study New Ways pp. 6976. to Speed Construction in Consideration of Cost to Commuters. Colorado Department of Transportation. Special Experimental Project Roads & Bridges, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2002. pp. 3235. No. 14: Colorado A+B Contract Summary. Denver, CO (undated). Daniels, G. Adding up Motorist Costs. Texas Transportation Researcher, Ellis, R., Pyeon, J-H., Herbsman, Z., Minchin, E., Molenaar, K. Eval- Vol. 36, No. 2, 2000, p. 5. uation of Alternative Contracting Techniques on FDOT Con- Daniels, G., Stockton, W. R., and Hundley, R. Estimating Road User struction Projects. RFP-DOT-05/06-9024-JP, Tallahassee, FL, Costs Associated with Highway Construction Projects: Simplified 2007. Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- Federal Highway Administration, Caltrans, and Industry Task Force. tion Research Board, No. 1732, TRB, National Research Council, The Lessons Learned From the Northridge Earthquake. Washington, Washington, DC, 2000, pp. 7079. DC, 1995. Elias, A. M. Development of a Systematic Approach for the Inclusion of McFarland, W.F., Kabat, R.J., and Krammes, R.A. Comparison of Accident Risk Factors in the Calculation of Road User Costs for Con- Contracting Strategies for Reducing Project Construction Time. Final struction Zones. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 1310-1F. 1998. FHWA/TX-94/1310-1F. 1994. Federal Highway Administration. Road User Cost Determination McFarland, W.F., Rollins, J.B., Drammes, R.A., Buffington, J.L., and Methods in Use for Innovative Contracting Projects. U.S. Depart- Memmott, J.L. Project Completion Times and Evaluation of Bidding ment of Transportation, Washington, DC (undated). Strategies with Bonuses and Liquidated Damages. Final Report. Gillespie, J. S. Estimating Road User Costs as a Basis for Incentive/ Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 41. 1987. Disincentive Amounts in Highway Construction Contracts. Virginia Minnesota Department of Transportation. Innovative Contracting in Transportation Research Council, VTRC 98-12. Charlottesville, Minnesota 2000 to 2005. Office of Construction and Innovative 1998. Contracting, St. Paul, 2005. Karan, M., and Haas, R.C.G. User Delay Cost Model for Highway North Dakota Department of Transportation. Evaluation of Innovative Rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record 554, TRB, National Contracting Practices `A+B' Bidding Method, Bismarck, 1996. Research Council, Washington, DC, 1975, pp. 3850. Olguin, E.T., Allison, B.T., and McCullough, B.F. Effectiveness of Levinson, D.M., and Gillen, D. The Full Cost of Intercity Highway Accelerating Highway Rehabilitation in Urban Areas. Research Report Transportation. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 3D, No. 4, SWUTC 60058-1, SWUTC/95/60058-1. Center for Transportation 1998, pp. 207223. Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1995. Mahoney, Kevin M. et al. Appendix B: Work Zone Speed Prediction Pinnacle One. Summary Level Study of A+B Bidding. California Model and User's Manual. In NCHRP Web-Only Document 105: Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2005. Final Report for NCHRP Report 581: Design of Construction Work Rister, B.W., and Graves, C. The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Zones on High-Speed Highways, Transportation Research Board of Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements. Kentucky the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006.

OCR for page 43
45 New Jersey Department of Transportation. Road User Cost Manual, Project Delay Issues Trenton, 2001. Rister, B.W., and Graves, C. The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Al-Saggaf, H.A. The Five Commandments of Construction Project Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements. Kentucky Delay Analysis. Cost Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1998, pp. 3741. Transportation Center, KTC-02-07/SPR197-99 & SPR218-00-1F, Gendell, D.S. Contracting and Contract Issues. In Special Report 212: Lexington, 2002. Transportation Management for Major Highway Reconstruction. TRB, Ryan, J.T., and Carson, J. Valuation of Temporary Transportation National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 7781. Facility Use Losses. Research Bureau--Montana Department of Kallo, G.G. Reliability of Critical Path Method (CPM) Techniques in the Transportation, FHWA/MT-02-005/8117-16, Helena, 2002. Analysis and Evaluation of Delay Claims. Cost Engineering, Vol. 38, Salem, O., Ashraf, G. Improved Models for User Costs Analysis. Ohio No. 5, 1996, pp. 3537. Department of Transportation, Office of Research and Development, Kartam, S. Generic Methodology for Analyzing Delay Claims. Journal Columbus, 2007. of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 6, 1999, Schnabel, R.S. Literature Review of Methods to Determine Road User Costs pp. 409419. In Construction Zones. MS thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Navarrete, G., Ahmad, I., and Najaft, F. Delay Claims and the Use of CPM. 1997. Proc, Annual Conference--Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Wang, Y., and Goodrum, P.M. Use of Conceptual Road User Costs for Vol. 3, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 1999, pp. 227236. a Rapid Roadway Construction Decision Making System. Proc., Supreme Court of Alabama. Milton Construction Company, Inc. v. State Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives, 2005, of Alabama Highway Department, et al. 568 So. 2d 784; 1990 Ala. pp. 979989. LEXIS 667, No. 89-514, 1990. Supreme Court of Alabama. State of Alabama Highway Department v. Milton Construction Company, Inc.; Milton Construction Company, Acceleration Impacts Inc. v. State of Alabama Highway Department, et al. 568 So. 2d 872; 1991 Ala. LEXIS 913, No. 1900596, 1900713, 1991. Al-Kaisy, A., and Nassar, K. Nighttime Construction Issues Revisited. Journal of Construction Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, pp. 139156. Ehrensperger, W. E. Role of a Project Manager's Organization in Scheduling/Determining Time Turnover and Startup. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 1979 Winter Meeting, San Francisco, CA., Vol. 33, 1979, El-Rayes, K. Optimum Planning of a Highway Construction Under pp. 589590. A+B Bidding Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Ferragut, T. Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C059 Accelerated Management, Vol. 127, No. 4, 2001, pp. 261269. Highway Construction: Workshop Series Summary. Transportation Florida Department of Transportation. Construction Project Adminis- Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2003. tration Manual: Contract Duration and Alternative Contracting Techniques, Section 1.2: Establishing Construction Contract Dura- tions. Topic No. 700-000-000. Tallahassee, 2003. Safety Fredlund, D.J., and King, F. Owner's Reviews of Schedules--How Far Should They Go? Transactions of the American Association of Bryden, J.E., and Mace, D.J. NCHRP Report 475: A Procedure for Cost Engineers, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. D.5.1-D.5.9. Assessing and Planning Nighttime Highway Construction and Gorman, T. Benefits of Redefining the Term "Completion Date." Maintenance. Transportation Research Board of the National Transportation Builder, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1999, p. 26. Academies, Washington, DC, 2002. Herbsman, Z.J., and Ellis, R. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 215: Bryden, J.E., and Mace, D.J., NCHRP Report 476: Guidelines for Design and Determination of Contract Time for Highway Construction Projects. Operation of Nighttime Traffic Control for Highway Maintenance TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1995. and Construction. Transportation Research Board of the National Kenner, S., Johnson, R.L., Miller, J.R., Salmen, J.A., and Matt, S.A. Academies, Washington, DC, 2002. Development of Working Day Weather Charts for Transportation Dembe, A.E., Erickson, J.B., Delbos, R.G., and Banks, S.M. The Impact Construction in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of of Overtime and Long Work Hours on Occupational Injuries and Transportation, Office of Research, Study SD97-07-F, Pierre, 1998. Illness: New Evidence from the United States. Occupational and Transportation Research Board. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 79: Environmental Medicine, Vol. 62, 2005, pp. 588597. Contract Time Determination. TRB, National Research Council, Mahoney, K. M., Porter, R. J., Porter, R. J., Taylor, D. R., and Washington, DC, 1981, p. 45. Kulakowski, B. T. NCHRP Report 581: Design of Construction Work Shr, J.R., Thompson, B.P., Russell, J.S., Ran, B., and Tserng, H.P. Deter- Zones on High-Speed Highways. Transportation Research Board of mining Minimum Contract Time for Highway Projects. Transporta- the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2007. tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Martin, P., Stevanovic, A., & Disegni, R., Costs on the I-15 Design- No. 1712, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000, pp. 196201. Build Reconstruction, Report No. UT-03.23. Civil & Environ- mental Engineering Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2003. Contractor Perspectives Riffkin, M., McMurty, T., Heath, S., and Saito, M. Variable Speed Limit on I/D Contracts Signs Effects on Speed and Speed Variation in Work Zones. Utah Department of Transportation Research and Innovation Division. Arditi, D., and Yasamis, F. Incentive/Disincentive Contracts: Perceptions UT-08.01, Salt Lake City, 2008. of Owners and Contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering Speed Management: A Road Safety Manual for Decision Makers and and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 361373. Practitioners. Global Road Safety Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland, Burkett, Z. Construction Delivery: Construction Contractor Perspective. 2008. 1998 Symposium on Innovative Contracting, Orlando, Florida. 1998.

OCR for page 43
46 Specification Kandil, A. A. Multi-Objective Optimization for Large-Scale Highway Construction Projects. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Colorado Department of Transportation. Revision of Section 102: Urbana-Champaign, 2005. Bidding Requirements and Conditions. Colorado Project No. FC Moselhi, O., and Hassanein, A. Optimized Scheduling of Linear Projects. NB(CX)CY 040-5(13), Denver, 1993. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 6, Florida Department of Transportation. Innovative and Alternative 2003, pp. 664673. Contracting Practices. Tallahassee, 1996. Pyeon, J.-H. Development of a Simulation Model to Predict the Impact of Florida Department of Transportation. Liquidated Savings for Early Incentive Contracts on Transportation Construction Project Time Completion, Tallahassee. 1996. Performance. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Department of Transportation. Preparation of Proposals. 2005. Tallahassee, 1996. Shen, L., Derek, D., and Zhang, Z. Optimal Bid Model for Price-Time Georgia Department of Transportation. Department of Transportation Biparameter Construction Contracts. Journal of Construction Engi- State of Georgia Special Provision Project NH-IM-95-1(23), Bryan neering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1999, pp. 204209. County P. I. No. 511150 Project Design Requirements. Savannah, Shr, J.F. Model Development for Cost-Plus-Time Bidding Applied to 1999. Florida Department of Transportation Highway Construction. PhD North Carolina Department of Transportation. Cost/Time (A+B) dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1999. Bidding. Raleigh, 1993. Shr, J.F., and Chen, W.T. A Method to Determine Minimum Contract Virginia Department of Transportation. Communication on Construc- Bids for Incentive Highway Projects. International Journal of Project tion Projects: Process for Field Decision-Making. Construction Management, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2003, pp. 601615. Directive Memorandum, CD-2004-01, Richmond, 2004. Shr, J.F., and Chen, W.T. Setting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/ Disincentive Contracts for Highway Construction Projects. Journal Case Study of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 8493. California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Shr, J.R., Ran, B., and Sung, C.W. Method to Determine Minimum Initial Report for A+B Pilot Contract 06-354504. Test & Evaluation Contract Bid for A+B+I/D Highway Projects. Journal of Construction #014 (A+B), Sacramento, 1993. Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp. 509516. California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Sukumaran, P., Mehmet, E.B., Hong, T.-H., and Hastak, M. Model for Initial Report for Warranty Pilot Contract 02-26404. Test & Eval- Analysis of Factors Affecting Construction Schedule in Highway uation Project #014 Innovative Contracting Practices (Warranty), Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 6, Sacramento, 1996. 2006, pp. 508517. Federal Highway Administration. Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones. A Case Study: Work Zone Travel Time System: Reduc- ing Congestion with the Use of a Traffic Management Contract Innovative Contracting Incentive During the Reconstruction of Arizona State Route 68. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2004. Federal Highway Administration. Briefing FHWA Initiatives to FMI. Partnering Close-Out Meeting: Del Camino Frontage Road. Col- Encourage Quality Through Innovative Contracting Practices Special orado Department of Transportation, Summary of A+B Bidding Experimental Project No. 14. U. S. Department of Transportation, Specification, Denver, 1994. Washington, DC, September 1996. Livingston, J. Lessons Learned from a Travel Time Incentive/Disincentive Federal Highway Administration. Briefing FHWA Initiatives to on State Route 68 in Arizona. 2002 Mentors Program: Papers on Encourage Quality Through Innovative Contracting Practices Special Advanced Surface Transportation Systems, College Station, TX, 2002, Experimental Project No. 14, U. S. Department of Transportation, pp. 127139. Washington, DC, January 1998. Maine Department of Transportation. Innovative Contracting Proce- Federal Highway Administration. Briefing on FHWA Innovative dures I-295 Scarborough to Portland Initial Report, Final Report, Contracting Practices, Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP-14): Work Plan, and Special Provisions to Section 102 and 103 Bidding Innovative Contracting. Table of Innovative Contracting Use by Requirements. Augusta, 1997. State. fhwa.dot.gov. Accessed July 31, 2000. Michigan Department of Transportation. Special Experimental Project Hancher, D. E. Contracting Methods for Highway Construction. Trans- No. 14: A+B Bidding, I-696/I-94 Interchange. Memorandum, portation in the New Millennium. TRB, National Research Council, Lansing, 1994. Washington, DC, 2000. Michigan Department of Transportation. User Cost Analysis During Herbsman, Z. J., Chen, W. T., and Epstein, W. C. Time Is Money: Lane Closures Replacement of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Innovative Contracting Methods in Highway Construction. Journal and Safety Upgrading of the I-696/I-94 Interchange. Lansing, 1994. of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 3, 1995, Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Initial Report: A+B Bidding pp. 273281. Method: As Part of Experimental Work Plan for 1020-08-61/72; Scott, S., and Mitchell, K. Alternative Payment and Progress Reporting IM 94-1(114), St. Croix River Bridge IH 94, St. Croix County. Methods: Task #2. Trauner Consulting Services, Philadelphia, PA Madison, 1994. (undated). Scott, S., Molenaar, K. R., Greenberg, D. D., and Smith, N. C. NCHRP Theoretical Model Report 561: Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, El-Rayes, K., and Kandil, A. Time-Cost-Quality Trade-Off Analysis for Washington, DC, 2006. Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Transportation Research Circular 386: Innovative Contracting Practices. Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2005, pp. 477486. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1991.

OCR for page 43
47 Yang, J.-B. and Wang, W.-C. Contractor Selection by the Most Advan- Capuro, F., and Seon, S. Criteria and Guidelines for Innovative Con- tageous Tendering Approach in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese tracting. South Dakota Department of Transportation: Office of Institute of Engineers, Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Research. Study SD95-07, Pierre, 1996. Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2003, pp. 381387. Felker, B. Guidelines for Use of A+B Bidding Provisions. California Department of Transportation Memorandum. Sacramento, 2002. Federal Highway Administration. Contract Administration Core Curricu- Multi-Parameter Bidding lum Participant's Manual and Reference Guide. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2006. Herbsman, Z., and Ellis, R. Multiparameter Bidding System-Innovation Florida Department of Transportation. Alternative Contracting User's in Contract Administration. Journal of Construction Engineering Guide Draft. Tallahassee, 1997. and Management, Vol. 181, No. 1, 1992, pp. 142150. Jaraiedi, M., Plummer, R. W., and Aber, M. S. Incentive/Disincentive Guidelines for Highway Construction Contracts. Journal of Construc- Outsourcing tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 1, 1995, pp. 112120. Maryland State Highway Agency. Maryland State Highway Authority Government Accountability Office. Increased Reliance on Contractors Guidelines for the Use of Bidding Procedures, Liquidated Damages, Can Pose Oversight Challenges for Federal and State Officials: Road User Benefit Cost, Incentive/Disincentives, Special Bidding Report to the Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infra- Methods, A+B Bidding Methods. Baltimore, 1994. structure, House of Representatives. GAO-08-198. Washington, New York State Department of Transportation. Guidelines for the Use DC, 2008. of Time-Related Contract Provision. Albany, 1999. New York State Department of Transportation. Implementation Guide- lines for A+B Bidding. Albany (undated). Guidelines/Reference Document New York State Department of Transportation. Implementation Guide- lines for Lane Rental and A+B Projects. Albany (undated). American Association of State Highway and Transportation. Primer on Ohio Department of Transportation (2006). Innovative Contracting Contracting: For the Twenty-First Century, 2006: A Report of the Manual. Cleveland, 2006. Contract Administration Task Force of the AASHTO Subcommittee Sillars, D.N. Establishing Guidelines for Incentive/Disincentive Con- on Construction, 5th ed. Washington, DC, 2005. tracting at ODOT. FHWA-OR-RD-07-07. SPR 630. 2007. Anderson, S. NCHRP Guidelines Detail Innovative Contracting Methods. Trauner Consulting Services. Criteria and Guidelines for Innovative Texas Transportation Researcher. Vol. 36, No. 2, 2000, p. 7. Contracting. South Dakota Department of Transportation Office Anderson, S., and Russell, J.S. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for of Research--Study SD95-07, Philadelphia, PA, 1996. Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best-Value Contracting. TRB, Utah Department of Transportation. Lane Rental Guidelines. Salt Lake National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001. City, 2005.