Time-Related Incentive and Disincentive Provisions in Highway Construction Contracts (2010)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

43 I/D Systems Abu-Hijleh, S. F., and Ibbs, C.W. Schedule-Based Construction Incentives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 115, No. 3, 1989, pp. 430–443. Anderson, S., and Russell, J.S. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best-Value Contracting. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001. Arditi, D., Khisty, C. J., and Yasamis, F. Incentive/Disincentive Provisions in Highway Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123, No. 3, 1997, pp. 302–307. Cox, D.O., Molenaar, K.R., Ernzen, J.J., Henk, G., Matthews, T.C., Smith, N., Williams, R.C., Gee, F., Kolb, J., Sanderson, L., Whited, G.C., Wight, J.W., and Yakowenko, G. Contract Administration: Technology and Practice in Europe. FHWA-PL-02-0xx, 2002. Curry, D. A. Use of Marginal Cost of Time in Highway Economy Studies. Highway Research Record 77. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1965, pp. 48–120. Haney, D. G. Use of Two Concepts of the Value of Time. Highway Research Record 12. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1963, pp. 1–19. Ibarra, C. Strategies Used by State DOTs to Accelerate Highway Con- struction Projects. 2002 Mentors Program. Papers on Advanced Surface Transportation Systems, pp. 83–125. Jaafari, A. Twinning Time and Cost in Incentive-Based Contracts. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1996, pp. 62–72. National Asphalt Pavement Association. HMA Visions 2005 and Beyond: Construction and Contracting Practices. Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2005, p. 9. Umachigi, S. Highway Construction: Improved Procedures to Overcome Challenges and Limitations. M.S. thesis, The State University of New York at Buffalo, 2005. Viljoen, P.S. Incentive Management Techniques for Pavement Rehabil- itation Construction. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1981. I/D Factors and Issues Coburn, W.B. Communication on Construction Projects: Process for Field Decision Making. Construction Directive Memorandum. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation. Rich- mond, VA, 2004. Kashiwagi, D., Sullivan, K., Greenwood, D., Kovell, J., and Egbu, C. Source of Construction Industry Instability and Performance Problems. Construction Research Congress: Broadening Perspec- tives, ASCE, 2005, pp. 419–423. Theberge, P. Construction Management Aspects of Florida DOT’s Innovative and Alternative Contracting Procedures. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1998. I/D and Liquidated Damages Rates Allen, R. K. Estimation of Construction Contract Liquidated Damages. Civil Engineering Practice, 10(1), 1995, p. 7. Finch, O. F. Legal Implications in the Use of Penalty and Bonus Provisions of Highway Construction Contracts: The Use of Incentive and Dis- incentive Clauses as Liquidated Damages for Quality Control and for Early Completion. Selected Studies in Highway Law, 1582-N63- 1582-N89, Vol. 3, 1988. Loulakis, M.C., and Mclaughlin, L.P. Enforcing Liquidated Damages: How Much Is Too Much? Civil Engineering, Vol. 74, No. 9, 2004, p. 96. McCormick, C.R. Make Liquidated Damages Work. AACE Inter- national—Transactions of the Annual Meeting, CDR151-CDR157, Orlando, FL, 2003. AB California Department of Transportation. Work Plan Special Experimen- tal Project #14 Innovative Contracting Techniques Cost-Plus-Time (A+B) Bidding Method. Sacramento, CA, 1994. Ellis, R. D., and Herbsman, Z. J. Cost-Time Bidding Concept: An Innovative Approach. Transportation Research Record 1282, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1990, pp. 89–94. Herbsman, Z. J. A+B Bidding Method-Hidden Success Story for Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 4, 1995, pp. 430–437. Jones, L., and Vargas, R. A+B Contracting. California Department of Transportation Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2002, pp. 22–25. Kent, D. Making Work Zones Work Better: Innovations in Technolo- gies, Practices, and Products Workshop; Innovative Contracting Techniques That Consider Driver Impacts: Use of A+B Bidding. Springfield, IL, 2003 (http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/workshops/ accessbile/Kent_MWZWB.htm). Petring, J., and Helgeson, B. A+B Process Review Report. Albuquerque, NM, 1999. A P P E N D I X A Bibliography

Lane Rental Gaj, S. J. Lane Rental: An Innovative Contracting Practice. TR News, No. 162, 1992, pp. 7–9. Herbsman, Z., Glagola, J., and Charles, R. Lane Rental—Innovative Way to Reduce Road Construction Time. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 411–417. Kent, D. Lane Rental Status Report and Issues. NYSDOT Memorandum, April 8, 1997. Trimels, K.A. Lane Rental in Wyoming. Wyoming Department of Transportation, Cheyenne, 2000. Evaluation of I/D Projects Bierbaum, R.R. Incentive/Disincentive Clauses: Do They Accelerate Highway Construction Projects in Iowa? Creative Component for Matters of Science in Transportation Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, 1991. California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Summary Initial Report for A+B Pile Contracts: 06-354503, 09-211504, and 11-085974. Sacramento, CA, 1993. Carpenter, B., Fekpe, E., and Gopalakrishna, D. Performance-Based Contracting for the Highway Construction Industry: An Evaluation of the Use of Innovative Contracting and Performance Specification in Highway Construction. Report submitted to Koch Industries, Inc., 2003. Christiansen, D.L. An Analysis of the Use of Incentive/Disincentive Contracting Provisions for Early Project Completion. In Special Report 212: Transportation Management for Major Highway Recon- struction, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 69–76. Colorado Department of Transportation. Special Experimental Project No. 14: Colorado A+B Contract Summary. Denver, CO (undated). Ellis, R., Pyeon, J-H., Herbsman, Z., Minchin, E., Molenaar, K. Eval- uation of Alternative Contracting Techniques on FDOT Con- struction Projects. RFP-DOT-05/06-9024-JP, Tallahassee, FL, 2007. Federal Highway Administration, Caltrans, and Industry Task Force. The Lessons Learned From the Northridge Earthquake. Washington, DC, 1995. McFarland, W.F., Kabat, R.J., and Krammes, R.A. Comparison of Contracting Strategies for Reducing Project Construction Time. Final Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 1310-1F. FHWA/TX-94/1310-1F. 1994. McFarland, W.F., Rollins, J.B., Drammes, R.A., Buffington, J.L., and Memmott, J.L. Project Completion Times and Evaluation of Bidding Strategies with Bonuses and Liquidated Damages. Final Report. Texas Transportation Institute, Research Report 41. 1987. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Innovative Contracting in Minnesota 2000 to 2005. Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting, St. Paul, 2005. North Dakota Department of Transportation. Evaluation of Innovative Contracting Practices ‘A+B’ Bidding Method, Bismarck, 1996. Olguin, E.T., Allison, B.T., and McCullough, B.F. Effectiveness of Accelerating Highway Rehabilitation in Urban Areas. Research Report SWUTC 60058-1, SWUTC/95/60058-1. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 1995. Pinnacle One. Summary Level Study of A+B Bidding. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2005. Rister, B.W., and Graves, C. The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements. Kentucky Transportation Center, KTC-02-07/SPR197-99 & SPR218-00-1F. Lexington, 2002. Ryan, J. T., and Carson, J. Valuation of Temporary Transportation Facility Use Losses. Research Bureau—Montana Department of Transportation, FHWA/MT-02-005/8117-16, Helena, 2002. Scott, S., Harris, R.A., and Greenwood, D. Assessing the New United Kingdom Protocol for Dealing with Delay and Disruption. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 50–59. Strong, K. 2006. Performance Effectiveness of Design-Build, Lane Rental, and A+B Contracting Techniques. Minnesota Department of Transportation. MN/RC-2006-09, St. Paul, 2006. Strong, K.C., Tometich, J., and Raadt, N. Cost Effectiveness of Design- Build, Lane Rental, and A+B Contracting Techniques. Proc., 2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, Iowa, 2005. Road User Cost British Columbia Ministry of Transportation. MicroBENCOST Guide- book: Guidelines for the Benefit Cost Analysis of Highway Projects in British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada, 2005. Buffington, J. L, Chui, M. K., and Memmot, J. L. Effects of Freeway Stage Construction on Nearby Land Uses and Vehicle User Costs. Transportation Research Record 1046, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1985, pp. 62–69. Carr, R. I. Construction Congestion (CO3) Basic Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 2, 2000. pp. 105–113. Cervarich, M. B. Timing Delays Like Relays: State DOTs Study New Ways to Speed Construction in Consideration of Cost to Commuters. Roads & Bridges, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2002. pp. 32–35. Daniels, G. Adding up Motorist Costs. Texas Transportation Researcher, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2000, p. 5. Daniels, G., Stockton, W. R., and Hundley, R. Estimating Road User Costs Associated with Highway Construction Projects: Simplified Method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 1732, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000, pp. 70–79. Elias, A. M. Development of a Systematic Approach for the Inclusion of Accident Risk Factors in the Calculation of Road User Costs for Con- struction Zones. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, 1998. Federal Highway Administration. Road User Cost Determination Methods in Use for Innovative Contracting Projects. U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, DC (undated). Gillespie, J. S. Estimating Road User Costs as a Basis for Incentive/ Disincentive Amounts in Highway Construction Contracts. Virginia Transportation Research Council, VTRC 98-12. Charlottesville, 1998. Karan, M., and Haas, R.C.G. User Delay Cost Model for Highway Rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record 554, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1975, pp. 38–50. Levinson, D.M., and Gillen, D. The Full Cost of Intercity Highway Transportation. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 3D, No. 4, 1998, pp. 207–223. Mahoney, Kevin M. et al. Appendix B: Work Zone Speed Prediction Model and User’s Manual. In NCHRP Web-Only Document 105: Final Report for NCHRP Report 581: Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006. 44

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Road User Cost Manual, Trenton, 2001. Rister, B.W., and Graves, C. The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements. Kentucky Transportation Center, KTC-02-07/SPR197-99 & SPR218-00-1F, Lexington, 2002. Ryan, J.T., and Carson, J. Valuation of Temporary Transportation Facility Use Losses. Research Bureau—Montana Department of Transportation, FHWA/MT-02-005/8117-16, Helena, 2002. Salem, O., Ashraf, G. Improved Models for User Costs Analysis. Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Research and Development, Columbus, 2007. Schnabel, R.S. Literature Review of Methods to Determine Road User Costs In Construction Zones. MS thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, 1997. Wang, Y., and Goodrum, P.M. Use of Conceptual Road User Costs for a Rapid Roadway Construction Decision Making System. Proc., Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives, 2005, pp. 979–989. Acceleration Impacts Al-Kaisy, A., and Nassar, K. Nighttime Construction Issues Revisited. Journal of Construction Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, pp. 139–156. Ehrensperger, W. E. Role of a Project Manager’s Organization in Turnover and Startup. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society 1979 Winter Meeting, San Francisco, CA., Vol. 33, 1979, pp. 589–590. Ferragut, T. Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C059 Accelerated Highway Construction: Workshop Series Summary. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2003. Safety Bryden, J.E., and Mace, D.J. NCHRP Report 475: A Procedure for Assessing and Planning Nighttime Highway Construction and Maintenance. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2002. Bryden, J.E., and Mace, D.J., NCHRP Report 476: Guidelines for Design and Operation of Nighttime Traffic Control for Highway Maintenance and Construction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2002. Dembe, A.E., Erickson, J.B., Delbos, R.G., and Banks, S.M. The Impact of Overtime and Long Work Hours on Occupational Injuries and Illness: New Evidence from the United States. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 62, 2005, pp. 588–597. Mahoney, K. M., Porter, R. J., Porter, R. J., Taylor, D. R., and Kulakowski, B. T. NCHRP Report 581: Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2007. Martin, P., Stevanovic, A., & Disegni, R., Costs on the I-15 Design- Build Reconstruction, Report No. UT-03.23. Civil & Environ- mental Engineering Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2003. Riffkin, M., McMurty, T., Heath, S., and Saito, M. Variable Speed Limit Signs Effects on Speed and Speed Variation in Work Zones. Utah Department of Transportation Research and Innovation Division. UT-08.01, Salt Lake City, 2008. Speed Management: A Road Safety Manual for Decision Makers and Practitioners. Global Road Safety Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. Project Delay Issues Al-Saggaf, H.A. The Five Commandments of Construction Project Delay Analysis. Cost Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1998, pp. 37–41. Gendell, D.S. Contracting and Contract Issues. In Special Report 212: Transportation Management for Major Highway Reconstruction. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1987, pp. 77–81. Kallo, G.G. Reliability of Critical Path Method (CPM) Techniques in the Analysis and Evaluation of Delay Claims. Cost Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1996, pp. 35–37. Kartam, S. Generic Methodology for Analyzing Delay Claims. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 6, 1999, pp. 409–419. Navarrete, G., Ahmad, I., and Najaft, F. Delay Claims and the Use of CPM. Proc, Annual Conference—Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Vol. 3, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 1999, pp. 227–236. Supreme Court of Alabama. Milton Construction Company, Inc. v. State of Alabama Highway Department, et al. 568 So. 2d 784; 1990 Ala. LEXIS 667, No. 89-514, 1990. Supreme Court of Alabama. State of Alabama Highway Department v. Milton Construction Company, Inc.; Milton Construction Company, Inc. v. State of Alabama Highway Department, et al. 568 So. 2d 872; 1991 Ala. LEXIS 913, No. 1900596, 1900713, 1991. Scheduling/Determining Time El-Rayes, K. Optimum Planning of a Highway Construction Under A+B Bidding Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 127, No. 4, 2001, pp. 261–269. Florida Department of Transportation. Construction Project Adminis- tration Manual: Contract Duration and Alternative Contracting Techniques, Section 1.2: Establishing Construction Contract Dura- tions. Topic No. 700-000-000. Tallahassee, 2003. Fredlund, D.J., and King, F. Owner’s Reviews of Schedules—How Far Should They Go? Transactions of the American Association of Cost Engineers, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. D.5.1-D.5.9. Gorman, T. Benefits of Redefining the Term “Completion Date.” Transportation Builder, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1999, p. 26. Herbsman, Z.J., and Ellis, R. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 215: Determination of Contract Time for Highway Construction Projects. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1995. Kenner, S., Johnson, R.L., Miller, J.R., Salmen, J.A., and Matt, S.A. Development of Working Day Weather Charts for Transportation Construction in South Dakota. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Office of Research, Study SD97-07-F, Pierre, 1998. Transportation Research Board. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 79: Contract Time Determination. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1981, p. 45. Shr, J.R., Thompson, B.P., Russell, J.S., Ran, B., and Tserng, H.P. Deter- mining Minimum Contract Time for Highway Projects. Transporta- tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1712, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000, pp. 196–201. Contractor Perspectives on I/D Contracts Arditi, D., and Yasamis, F. Incentive/Disincentive Contracts: Perceptions of Owners and Contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, 1998, pp. 361–373. Burkett, Z. Construction Delivery: Construction Contractor Perspective. 1998 Symposium on Innovative Contracting, Orlando, Florida. 1998. 45

Specification Colorado Department of Transportation. Revision of Section 102: Bidding Requirements and Conditions. Colorado Project No. FC NB(CX)CY 040-5(13), Denver, 1993. Florida Department of Transportation. Innovative and Alternative Contracting Practices. Tallahassee, 1996. Florida Department of Transportation. Liquidated Savings for Early Completion, Tallahassee. 1996. Florida Department of Transportation. Preparation of Proposals. Tallahassee, 1996. Georgia Department of Transportation. Department of Transportation State of Georgia Special Provision Project NH-IM-95-1(23), Bryan County P. I. No. 511150 Project Design Requirements. Savannah, 1999. North Carolina Department of Transportation. Cost/Time (A+B) Bidding. Raleigh, 1993. Virginia Department of Transportation. Communication on Construc- tion Projects: Process for Field Decision-Making. Construction Directive Memorandum, CD-2004-01, Richmond, 2004. Case Study California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Initial Report for A+B Pilot Contract 06-354504. Test & Evaluation #014 (A+B), Sacramento, 1993. California Department of Transportation Division of Construction. Initial Report for Warranty Pilot Contract 02-26404. Test & Eval- uation Project #014 Innovative Contracting Practices (Warranty), Sacramento, 1996. Federal Highway Administration. Intelligent Transportation Systems in Work Zones. A Case Study: Work Zone Travel Time System: Reduc- ing Congestion with the Use of a Traffic Management Contract Incentive During the Reconstruction of Arizona State Route 68. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2004. FMI. Partnering Close-Out Meeting: Del Camino Frontage Road. Col- orado Department of Transportation, Summary of A+B Bidding Specification, Denver, 1994. Livingston, J. Lessons Learned from a Travel Time Incentive/Disincentive on State Route 68 in Arizona. 2002 Mentors Program: Papers on Advanced Surface Transportation Systems, College Station, TX, 2002, pp. 127–139. Maine Department of Transportation. Innovative Contracting Proce- dures I-295 Scarborough to Portland Initial Report, Final Report, Work Plan, and Special Provisions to Section 102 and 103 Bidding Requirements. Augusta, 1997. Michigan Department of Transportation. Special Experimental Project No. 14: A+B Bidding, I-696/I-94 Interchange. Memorandum, Lansing, 1994. Michigan Department of Transportation. User Cost Analysis During Lane Closures Replacement of Continuously Reinforced Concrete and Safety Upgrading of the I-696/I-94 Interchange. Lansing, 1994. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Initial Report: A+B Bidding Method: As Part of Experimental Work Plan for 1020-08-61/72; IM 94-1(114), St. Croix River Bridge IH 94, St. Croix County. Madison, 1994. Theoretical Model El-Rayes, K., and Kandil, A. Time-Cost-Quality Trade-Off Analysis for Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2005, pp. 477–486. Kandil, A. A. Multi-Objective Optimization for Large-Scale Highway Construction Projects. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2005. Moselhi, O., and Hassanein, A. Optimized Scheduling of Linear Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 6, 2003, pp. 664–673. Pyeon, J.-H. Development of a Simulation Model to Predict the Impact of Incentive Contracts on Transportation Construction Project Time Performance. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2005. Shen, L., Derek, D., and Zhang, Z. Optimal Bid Model for Price-Time Biparameter Construction Contracts. Journal of Construction Engi- neering and Management, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1999, pp. 204–209. Shr, J.F. Model Development for Cost-Plus-Time Bidding Applied to Florida Department of Transportation Highway Construction. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1999. Shr, J.F., and Chen, W.T. A Method to Determine Minimum Contract Bids for Incentive Highway Projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2003, pp. 601–615. Shr, J.F., and Chen, W.T. Setting Maximum Incentive for Incentive/ Disincentive Contracts for Highway Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp. 84–93. Shr, J.R., Ran, B., and Sung, C.W. Method to Determine Minimum Contract Bid for A+B+I/D Highway Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp. 509–516. Sukumaran, P., Mehmet, E.B., Hong, T.-H., and Hastak, M. Model for Analysis of Factors Affecting Construction Schedule in Highway Work Zones. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 6, 2006, pp. 508–517. Innovative Contracting Federal Highway Administration. Briefing FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Quality Through Innovative Contracting Practices Special Experimental Project No. 14. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, September 1996. Federal Highway Administration. Briefing FHWA Initiatives to Encourage Quality Through Innovative Contracting Practices Special Experimental Project No. 14, U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, January 1998. Federal Highway Administration. Briefing on FHWA Innovative Contracting Practices, Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP-14): Innovative Contracting. Table of Innovative Contracting Use by State. fhwa.dot.gov. Accessed July 31, 2000. Hancher, D. E. Contracting Methods for Highway Construction. Trans- portation in the New Millennium. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000. Herbsman, Z. J., Chen, W. T., and Epstein, W. C. Time Is Money: Innovative Contracting Methods in Highway Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 3, 1995, pp. 273–281. Scott, S., and Mitchell, K. Alternative Payment and Progress Reporting Methods: Task #2. Trauner Consulting Services, Philadelphia, PA (undated). Scott, S., Molenaar, K. R., Greenberg, D. D., and Smith, N. C. NCHRP Report 561: Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006. Transportation Research Circular 386: Innovative Contracting Practices. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1991. 46

Yang, J.-B. and Wang, W.-C. Contractor Selection by the Most Advan- tageous Tendering Approach in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2003, pp. 381–387. Multi-Parameter Bidding Herbsman, Z., and Ellis, R. Multiparameter Bidding System-Innovation in Contract Administration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 181, No. 1, 1992, pp. 142–150. Outsourcing Government Accountability Office. Increased Reliance on Contractors Can Pose Oversight Challenges for Federal and State Officials: Report to the Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infra- structure, House of Representatives. GAO-08-198. Washington, DC, 2008. Guidelines/Reference Document American Association of State Highway and Transportation. Primer on Contracting: For the Twenty-First Century, 2006: A Report of the Contract Administration Task Force of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction, 5th ed. Washington, DC, 2005. Anderson, S. NCHRP Guidelines Detail Innovative Contracting Methods. Texas Transportation Researcher. Vol. 36, No. 2, 2000, p. 7. Anderson, S., and Russell, J.S. NCHRP Report 451: Guidelines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best-Value Contracting. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001. Capuro, F., and Seon, S. Criteria and Guidelines for Innovative Con- tracting. South Dakota Department of Transportation: Office of Research. Study SD95-07, Pierre, 1996. Felker, B. Guidelines for Use of A+B Bidding Provisions. California Department of Transportation Memorandum. Sacramento, 2002. Federal Highway Administration. Contract Administration Core Curricu- lum Participant’s Manual and Reference Guide. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2006. Florida Department of Transportation. Alternative Contracting User’s Guide Draft. Tallahassee, 1997. Jaraiedi, M., Plummer, R. W., and Aber, M. S. Incentive/Disincentive Guidelines for Highway Construction Contracts. Journal of Construc- tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 121, No. 1, 1995, pp. 112–120. Maryland State Highway Agency. Maryland State Highway Authority Guidelines for the Use of Bidding Procedures, Liquidated Damages, Road User Benefit Cost, Incentive/Disincentives, Special Bidding Methods, A+B Bidding Methods. Baltimore, 1994. New York State Department of Transportation. Guidelines for the Use of Time-Related Contract Provision. Albany, 1999. New York State Department of Transportation. Implementation Guide- lines for A+B Bidding. Albany (undated). New York State Department of Transportation. Implementation Guide- lines for Lane Rental and A+B Projects. Albany (undated). Ohio Department of Transportation (2006). Innovative Contracting Manual. Cleveland, 2006. Sillars, D.N. Establishing Guidelines for Incentive/Disincentive Con- tracting at ODOT. FHWA-OR-RD-07-07. SPR 630. 2007. Trauner Consulting Services. Criteria and Guidelines for Innovative Contracting. South Dakota Department of Transportation Office of Research—Study SD95-07, Philadelphia, PA, 1996. Utah Department of Transportation. Lane Rental Guidelines. Salt Lake City, 2005. 47