National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Legal Research Digest 32: Reconciling Security, Disclosure, and Record-Retention Requirements in Transit Procurements (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Legal Program (TCRPLEGAL)

Citation Manager

Waite, Jocelyn K, Transportation Research Board. "COVER." TCRP Legal Research Digest 32: Reconciling Security, Disclosure, and Record-Retention Requirements in Transit Procurements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
1
bottomleft bottomright
Page
1
COVER (1-1)
CONTENTS (2-2)
LIST OF ACRONYMS (3-3)
LIKELY QUESTIONS CONCERNING MANAGEMENT OF SECURITY INFORMATION (4-4)
A. Statement of the Problem (5-5)
B. Background of Threats to Public Transit Systems (6-6)
C. Background of Public Records Requirements (7-11)
A. FOIA (12-17)
B. Critical Infrastructure Information/Sensitive Security Information (18-30)
III. STATE LAW SUMMARY (31-31)
A. Public Records Laws - Disclosure Requirements (32-37)
B. Public Records Laws - Security Exemptions (38-39)
C. Public Records Laws - Other Exemptions That May Protect SSI and Other Security Information (40-42)
D. Records Management Laws (43-43)
A. Transit Agency A (44-44)
C. Agency C (45-46)
F. Virginia Department of Transportation (47-47)
A. Minimizing Need to Balance Security and Transparency (48-48)
B. Deciding Whether Information Should Be Disclosed (49-49)
C. Procedures for Maintaining Contract Records Containing CII/SSI/Restricted Security Information (50-52)
D. Issues to Consider in Establishing/Reviewing Security Protocol for Procurement Process (53-53)
VI. CONCLUSIONS (54-56)
APPENDIX A: Federal Statutory and Regulatory Provisions (57-59)
APPENDIX B: State Public Records/Freedom of Information Laws (60-63)
APPENDIX C: Security Exemptions to State Public Records/Freedom of Information Laws (64-69)
APPENDIX D: State Records Management Laws (70-73)
APPENDIX E: Sample Nondisclosure Agreements (74-74)
APPENDIX F: Examples of SSI and Non-SSI (75-75)
APPENDIX G: Checklist for Assessing Adequacy of Management of Security Information (76-78)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (79-79)
BACK COVER (80-80)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1
August 2010 Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Smith Legal Research Digest 32 RECONCILING sECURITY, dISCLOSURE, AND rECORD-rETENTION rEQUIREMENTS IN tRANSIT pROCUREMENTS This report was prepared under TCRP Project J-5, "Legal Aspects of Transit and Intermodal Transportation Programs," for which the Transportation Research Board is the agency coordinating the research. The report was prepared by Jocelyn K. Waite, Esq., Waite & Associates. James B. McDaniel, TRB Counsel for Legal Research Projects, was the principal investigator and content editor. The Problem and Its Solution recently, maintaining the confidentiality of security information not commonly available has come to the The nation's 6,000 plus transit agencies need to have fore. While issues related to such security informa- access to a program that can provide authoritatively tion are most obvious for security contracts, transit researched, specific, limited-scope studies of legal is- agency personnel should also be aware of the poten- sues and problems having national significance and tial for security information being included in com- application to their business. Some transit programs petitive bidding for other types of contracts. At the involve legal problems and issues that are not shared same time, there is also a clear, well-established pub- with other modes; as, for example, compliance with lic interest in ensuring that publicly funded projects transit-equipment and operations guidelines, FTA fi- are transparent. nancing initiatives, private-sector programs, and labor There are several major aspects of the procurement or environmental standards relating to transit opera- process for which it is important to be cognizant of tions. Also, much of the information that is needed by security requirements: developing the procurement transit attorneys to address legal concerns is scattered documentation, allowing site visits and access to an- and fragmented. Consequently, it would be helpful to cillary documents not part of the procurement docu- the transit lawyer to have well-resourced and well- mentation, responding to requests for information documented reports on specific legal topics available from parties other than bidders and contractors, and to the transit legal community. managing procurement documents. The Legal Research Digests (LRDs) are developed Transit agencies must also be cognizant of dis- to assist transit attorneys in dealing with the myriad closure requirements under both federal and state of initiatives and problems associated with transit law that will affect their ability to protect security start-up and operations, as well as with day-to-day le- information. gal work. The LRDs address such issues as eminent There are requirements relevant to transit agencies' domain, civil rights, constitutional rights, contract- efforts to balance the competing needs of open gov- ing, environmental concerns, labor, procurement, risk ernment and public security. These legal requirements management, security, tort liability, and zoning. The include federal and state open records requirements, transit legal research, when conducted through the including security exemptions; post-September 11, TRB's legal studies process, either collects primary 2001, federal requirements for specified types of se- data that generally are not available elsewhere or per- curity information; and federal and state record reten- forms analysis of existing literature. tion requirements. This digest should be useful to attorneys, trans- Applications portation officials, engineers, information specialists, security personnel, record retention staff, and policy Transit agencies have historically been aware of the makers. confidentiality required in the bidding process. More TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES