Click for next page ( 92


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 91
91 References 1. National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Com- 13. Canales, Roberto, and Anthony Roper. Realign NCDOT. North mission. Did You Know--Demographic and Economic Trends. Carolina Department of Transportation. [Online] November 13, National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commis- 2008. [Cited: April 14, 2009.] sion website. [Online] July 7, 2008. [Cited: October 14, 2009.] http:// 14. Tracker--Measures of Departmental Performance. Missouri Depart- transportationfortomorrow.org/global/did_you_know.aspx. ment of Transportation. [Online] 2009. [Cited: June 3, 2009.] 2. Nokes, Sebastian. The Definitive Guide to Project Management: The 15. Repairing U.S. Bridges Would Cost $140 Billion. CNN.com. fast track to getting the job done on time and on budget. New York: [Online] July 28, 2008. [Cited: June 23, 2009.] http://www.cnn.com/ Prentice Hall, 2007. 2008/US/07/28/bridge.report/index.html#cnnSTCOther1. 3. Program Management. Wikipedia. [Online] [Cited: October 10, 16. National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Com- 2009.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_(management)#cite_ mission. Transportation for Tomorrow: Report of the National Surface note-0. Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission. [Online] 4. Gleick, James. The Paradigm Shift. The New York Times website. December 2007. http://transportationfortomorrow.org/final_ [Online] December 29, 1996. [Cited: September 25, 2009.] http:// report/ www.nytimes.com/1996/12/29/magazine/the-paradigm-shifts. 17. Streamlining and Integrating ROW and Utility Processes with html. Planning, Environmental, and Design Processes in Australia and 5. Raymond, Susan. The Coming Paradigm Shift in Philanthropy: Canada. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway It's not about the money. On Philanthropy website. [Online] Administration. [Online] June 2009. September 5, 2008. [Cited: September 25, 2009.] http://www. 18. Agency Challenges to Integrating Context Sensitive Solutions. onphilanthropy.com/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7591. Federal Highway Administration website. [Online] March 2006. 6. Federal Highway Administration. Collaborative Leadership: Suc- [Cited: June 24, 2009.] http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/context/ cess stories in transportation mega projects. Federal Aid Program challenges.cfm. Administration website. [Online] 2004. [Cited: September 28, 2009.] 19. Missouri Department of Transportation and American Council of http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/mega/collaborative.cfm. Engineering Companies. Application Brochure. Practical Design: 7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation 2009 Awards for Excellence. Jefferson City: Missouri Department of Officials. A Primer on Performance-Based Highway Program Man- Transportation, 2009. agement. Washington: 2008. 20. Contest Sensitive Solutions. Illinois Department of Transporta- 8. George, Ryan, Lansford C. Bell, and W. Edward Back. Critical tion website. [Online] April 2004. http://www.dot.state.il.us/css/ Activities in the Front End Planning Process. Journal of Manage- cssguide.pdf. ment in Engineering. [Online] April 2008. [Cited: June 22, 2009.] 21. Transportation Planning. California Department of Transportation 9. Barber, Elizabeth. Benchmarking the Management of Projects: A website. [Online] [Cited: April 8, 2009.] http://www.cot.ca.gov/hq/ review of current thinking. International Journal of Project Man- tpp/offices/osp/ctp.html. agement. [Online] August 2004. 22. U.S. Department of Transportation. Highway Statistic Series 2007. 10. North Carolina Department of Transportation. North Carolina Policy Information. Federal Highway Administration website. Interagency Leadership Team. North Carolina Department of Trans- [Online] October 2008. [Cited: April 23, 2009.] http://www.fhwa. portation website. [Online] June 2006. http://ncilt.org. dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2007/pdf/hm81.pdf. 11. McMillan, Elizabeth. Considering Organisation Structure and 23. 20072008 Fiscal Year Highlights. California Department of Trans- Design from a Complexity Paradigm Perspective. Conference Pro- portation website. [Online] 2008. [Cited: April 6, 2009.] http:// ceedings of the Manufacturing Complexity Network Conference, www.dot.ca.gov/docs/2008FiscalYearHighlights.pdf. April 2002, University of Cambridge Department of Engineer- 24. People Statistics--Population. Statemaster.com. [Online] 2005. ing, Institute for Manufacturing. Cambridge, UK. [Online] http:// [Cited: April 6, 2009.] http://www.statemaster.com/graph/peo_pop- ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/mcn/pdf_files/part5_5.pdf people-population. 12. Combs, Susan. Paving the Way: A review of the Texas Department 25. Crane, Randall, Abel Valenzuela, Dan Chatman, Lisa Schweitzer, of Transportation. Texas Department of Transportation. [Online] Peter J. Wong, Chris Williamson, and Erik Kancler. California January 2001. [Cited: December 19, 2007.] Travel Trends and Demographic Study. University of California

OCR for page 91
92 Transportation Center website. [Online] December 2002. [Cited: 44. Four Year Bridge Investment Plan. Maine Department of Trans- April 9, 2009.] http://policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/chatman/Excerpt portation website. [Online] April 8, 2008. [Cited: April 27, 2009.] TravelStudy.pdf. http://www.maine.gov/mdot/bridgeinfo/bidocs/Bridge%20Invest 26. California Transportation Plan 2025. Sacramento: California ment%20Narrative%20Final%204-8-08%20_2_.pdf. Department of Transportation, 2006. 45. Maryland Department of Transportation 2009 Annual Attainment 27. How is Transportation Funded in California? Budget Backgrounder: Report. Maryland Department of Transportation. [Online] 2009. Making dollars make sense. California Budget Project. [Online] Sep- [Cited: September 14, 2009 and October 6, 2009.] http://www.mdot. tember 2006. [Cited: April 6, 2009.] http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2006/ state.md.us/Planning/Plans%20Programs%20Reports/Reports/ 0609_transportationprimer.pdf. Attainment%20Reports/2009_Attainment_Report.pdf. 28. Taylor, Mac. California Spending Plan 200809. Legislative Analyst's 46. Highway Needs Inventory Overview. Maryland Department of Office website. [Online] November 2008. [Cited: April 6, 2009.] Transportation website. [Online] 2009. [Cited: September 14, 2009.] http://www.lao.ca.gov/2008/spend_plan/spending_plan_08-09.pdf. http://www.sha.maryland.gov/oppen/hni_K.pdf. 29. Schrank, David and Tom Lomax. TTI Urban Mobility Information, 47. U.S. Department of Commerce. Gross Domestic Product by State. 2007 Annual Urban Mobility Report, National Congestion Tables. Bureau of Economic Analysis website. [Online] 2009. http://www. Texas Transportation Institute website. [Online] September 2007. bea.gov/regional/gsp/. [Cited: January 9, 2009.] http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/congestion. 48. U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics 30. Land, Richard. Personal communication. July 28, 2008. Division. Median Household Income (in 2008 Inflation-Adjusted 31. Tom Warne and Associates, LLC. A National Assessment of Dollars) by State Ranked from Highest to Lowest Using 3-Year Transportation Strategies and Practices: Lessons for California. Average: 20062008. State Median Income, Annual Social and Eco- California Taxpayers' Association website. [Online] February 12, nomic Supplement, U.S. Census Bureau website. [Online] Septem- 2008. [Cited: February 28, 2008.] http://www.caltax.org/Capital ber 21, 2009. [Cited: October 1, 2009.] http://www.census.gov/ ProgramDeliveryAssessment2-12-08.pdf. hhes/www/income/statemedfaminc.html. 32. Project Management--Chronology. California Department of 49. MDOT Office of Planning and Capital Programming. Maryland Transportation website. [Online] 2007. [Cited: April 6, 2009.] http:// Statewide Freight Plan. Maryland Department of Transportation www.dot.ca.gov/hq/projmgmt/chron_1960.htm. website. [Online] September 2009. [Cited: October 6, 2009.] http:// 33. NEPA Delegation. California Department of Transportation website. www.mdot.state.md.us/Planning/Freight%20Planning/Update/ [Online] 2007. [Cited: April 8, 2009.] http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/ Statewide%20Freight%20Plan%202009.pdf. env/nepa_pilot/html/nepa_delegation_pilot_program.htm. 50. MDOT Overview--FY 2010 Budget Allowance. Maryland Depart- 34. Caltrans Strategic Plan 20072012. California Department of Trans- ment of Transportation website. [Online] 2009. [Cited: July 28, portation website. [Online] December 17, 2007. [Cited: April 1, 2009.] http://www.mdot.state.md.us/Transportation%20Revenues 2009.] http://www.dot.ca.gov/perf/StrategicPlan20072012_with_ %20and%20Expenses/Documents/MDOT%20Overview%20Pre Bookmarks.pdf. sentation%20-%20FY%202010.ppt. 35. Transportation System Performance Measures: A California Trans- 51. Maryland Transportation Plan 2009. Maryland Department of portation Plan Module. [Powerpoint Presentation]. San Diego: Transportation website. [Online] January 2009. [Cited: October 1, California Department of Transportation, 1998. 2009.] http://www.mdot.state.md.us/Planning/Plans%20Programs 36. Performance Measures for California Transportation System Users %20Reports/Reports/MTP/09MTP.pdf. and Investors. Sacramento: UCLA Extension Public Policy, 1997. 37. U.S. States--Area and Ranking. Enchanted Learning website. 52. Maryland Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Plan- [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 27, 2009.] http://www.enchanted ning Organizations. Statewide Transportation Improvement learning.com/usa/states/area.shtml. Program FY20082012. Maryland Department of Transportation 38. List of U.S. States by Population Density. Wikipedia website. website. [Online] 2008. [Cited: October 6, 2009.] http://www. [Online] [Cited: April 27, 2009.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ mdot.state.md.us/Planning/STIPandTIP/STIPandTIP. List_of_U.S._states_by_population_density. 53. Maryland State Highway Administration. Contest Sensitive Design 39. Selected Measures for Identifying Peer States. Federal Highway (CSD)/Thinking Beyond the Pavement. Maryland Department Administration website. [Online] 2005. [Cited: April 27, 2009.] of Transportation website. [Online] [Cited: October 6, 2009.] http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs05/htm/ps1.htm. http://www.sha.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=332. 40. Federal Functional Classification of Highways. Maine Department 54. Maryland State Highway Administration. Accelerating Transporta- of Transportation website. [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 26, 2009.] tion Programs and Projects from Conception to Completion. Baltimore, http://www.maine.gov/mdot/maines-transportation-systems/ August 21, 2008. classification-highways%20.php. 55. Design-Build. Wikipedia.com. [Online] Wikimedia Foundation, 41. Keeping Our Bridges Safe. Maine Department of Transportation Inc., July 24, 2009. [Cited: August 11, 2009.] http://en.wikipedia.org/ website. [Online] November 26, 2007. http://www.maine.gov/ wiki/Design-build. mdot/pdf/Keeping%20Our%20Bridges%20Safe.1107.pdf. 56. KCI Technologies, Inc. Maryland Department of Transportation 42. Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 20082030. Maine I-270 Multi-Modal Corridor C/M Opportunity. Maryland State Department of Transportation website. [Online] December 2008. Highway Administration Business Center. [Online] July 2005. [Cited: [Cited: April 26, 2009.] http://www.maine.gov/mdot/connecting August 7, 2009.] http://www.i-270corridorp3.com/images/prjtinfo/ maine/pdf/finalreportdec2008/connecting%20maine%20planning current_practices/dispatchServlet.pdf. %20our%20trans%20future_web_all.pdf. 57. Choplin, Lisa. Maryland's Best Value (Competitive Sealed Proposal) 43. Interviews and panel discussion with Maine Department of Trans- Pilot Program. 2005 Standing Committee on Quality Conference portation administration and management personnel. Augusta, [Online] April 6, 2005. [Cited: August 11, 2009.] cms.transportation. May 2223, 2008. org/sites/quality/docs/LChoplin_BestValue.pdf.

OCR for page 91
93 58. A Conversation for Moving Missouri Forward. Missouri Department 2007. [Cited: August 2008.] http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/ of Transportation website. [Online] April 9, 2009. [Cited: July 19, capital/pd/pipeline_listing.shtm. 2009.] http://www.modot.org/conversation/documents/Move 74. NJDOT Asset Management Plan (Draft). New Jersey Department MoForwardBrochure.pdf. of Transportation. 2008. 59. Missouri Department of Transportation. Report to the Joint 75. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Transformation Committee on Transportation Oversight. Transportation for the Management Team. Improving How NCDOT Delivers Trans- Next Generation website. [Online] 2008. [Cited: August 8, 2009.] portation Services to North Carolinians. North Carolina Depart- http://www.modot.org/newsandinfo/reports/2008Accountability ment of Transportation website. [Online] October 3, 2007. [Cited: Report/ExecutiveSummary.pdf. March 19, 2009.] http://www.ncdot.org'programs/dashboard/ 60. Wendell Cox Consultancy. Land Use by US State: 1990: Urban, content/download/070927_BOT_Report.v15.pdf. Agricultural & Open Space. Demographia.com. [Online] 1991. 76. U.S. Department of Transportation. Policy Information--High- [Cited: September 30, 2009.] http://www.demographia.com/ way Statistic Series 2007. Federal Highway Administration website. db-landstate.htm. [Online] October 2008. [Cited: March 14, 2009.] http://www. 61. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Table 1-1: Missouri's Public fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2007/pdf/hm81.pdf. Road Length, Miles by Functional System. State Transportation Sta- 77. 2008 NCDOT Annual Performance Report Executive Summary. tistics. Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research North Carolina Department of Transportation website. [Online] and Innovative Technical Administration, 2000. http://bts.gov January 9, 2009. [Cited: March 25, 2009.] http://www.ncdot. 62. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Table 5-3: Highway Vehicle org/programs/dashboard/content/download/08_ExecSummary_ Miles Traveled (VMT): 2002, 2007. State Transportation Statistics. Organizational_Performance_Rpt.pdf. Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and 78. Rural Data Bank--Population in North Carolina. North Carolina Innovative Technical Administration, 2008. http://bts.gov Rural Economic Development Center, Inc. website. [Online] June 8, 63. MoDOT News and Information. Missouri Department of Trans- 2007. [Cited: April 15, 2009.] http://www.ncruralcenter.org/ portation website. [Online] July 8, 2009. [Cited: September 17, 2009.] databank/datasheet.asp?topic=Population. http://www.modot.mo.gov/newsandinfo/District0News.shtml? 79. U.S. Census Bureau News. U.S. Census Bureau website. [Online] action=displaySSI&newsId=33740. March 19, 2009. [Cited: April 25, 2009.] http://www.census.gov/ 64. Missouri Department of Transportation. 2007 Application for Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/013426.html. the Missouri Quality Award. Missouri Quality Award website. 80. The New NCDOT. North Carolina Department of Transporta- [Online] 2007. http://www.mqa.org/pdf/2007-MoDOT%20App% tion website. [Online] November 2008. [Cited: March 19, 2009.] 20Summary.pdf. http://www.ncdot.org/programs/dashboard/content/download/ 65. Interviews and panel discussion with Missouri Department of NewNCDOT.pdf. Transportation administration and management personnel. 81. List, George F., Robert S. Foyle, Henry Canipe, John Cameron, Jefferson City, June 2425, 2008. and Eric Stromberg. Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina: 66. MoDOT Tracker: Measures of departmental performance. Missouri An investigation of the issues with recommendations for action. Department of Transportation website. [Online] July 2009. [Cited: North Carolina Department of Transportation website. [Online] August 21, 2009.] http://www.modot.org/about/general_info/ May 13, 2008. [Cited: March 19, 2009.] http://www.osbm.state. Tracker.htm. nc.us/files/pdf_files/05132008StatewideLogisticsPlan.pdf. 67. Missouri Department of Transportation. Partnership Develop- 82. Volume 4: Funding. Transformation Final Report. North Carolina ment Process. Partnership Development website. [Online] Janu- Department of Transportation. August 2007. http://ncdot.gov/ ary 2009. [Cited: August 25, 2009.] http://www.modot.mo.gov/ performance/reports/default.html partnershipdevelopment/index.htm. 83. What is Merger 01? North Carolina Department of Transportation 68. MoDOT's Approach to Program Management. Missouri Depart- website. [Online] [Cited: March 17, 2009.] http://www.ncdot.gov/ ment of Transportation website. [Online] Spring 2007. [Cited: Sep- doh/preconstruct/pe/MERGER01/default.html. tember 3, 2009.] http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/documents/ 84. Interviews and panel discussion with North Carolina Department Programmanagementsupportdocument.pdf. of Transportation administration and management personnel. 69. Complete Tracker Document. Missouri Department of Transporta- Raleigh, June 26, 2008. tion website. [Online] July 2009. [Cited: September 11, 2009.] http:// 85. Varnedoe, Steve. Highway Performance Based Management www.modot.mo.gov/about/general_info/Tracker.htm. Workshop. North Carolina Department of Transportation website. 70. Organizational Results Division, Missouri Department of Trans- [Online] November 1718, 2005. [Cited: April 20, 2009.] http:// portation. Practical Design Case Study--Staff Summary. Missouri www.ncdot.org/doh/operations/dp_chief_eng/maintenance/road_ Department of Transportation website. [Online] May 2007. [Cited: main/PerfBasedMgt/Steve.pdf. September 9, 2009.] http://library.modot.mo.gov/RDT/reports/ 86. North Carolina Interagency Leadership Team Strategic Plan 2006. Ri07003/ss07005.pdf. North Carolina Department of Transportation website. [Online] 71. Swift, Earl. How We Can Save Our Roads. Parade Magazine. 2006. [Cited: April 20, 2009.] http://www.ncdot.org/programs/ March 3, 2009. environment/development/interagency/ncilt/download/ILT_ 72. FY 20082012 Statewide Capital Investment Strategy. New Jersey StrategicPlan.pdf. Department of Transportation website. [Online] March 30, 2007. 87. Celebrating 10 Years of Innovation--Continuous Process Im- [Cited: October 10, 2008.] http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/ provement. North Carolina Department of Transportation web- capital/cis/. site. [Online] 2008. [Cited: April 20, 2009.] http://www.ncdot.org/ 73. NJDOT Capital Project Delivery Pipeline Activity Listing. New _includes/download/external.html?pdf=http%3A//www.ncdot.org/ Jersey Department of Transportation website. [Online] October 10, programs/cpi/download/CPI_ResultsBook.pdf.

OCR for page 91
94 88. Laying the Foundation for a Successful Transformation. North 100. Pass Through Financing. Texas Department of Transportation Carolina Department of Transportation website. [Online] October website. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 13, 2009.] ftp://ftp. 2007. [Cited: March 18, 2009.] http://www.ncdot.gov/programs/ dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/library/pubs/bus/open4biz/pass_ dashboard/. through_finance_feb09.pdf. 89. Mission and Vision. Texas Department of Transportation website. 101. Texas Department of Transportation Commission Meeting Tran- [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 20, 2009.] http://www.txdot.gov/ script. Texas Department of Transportation website. [Online] July 18, about_us/mission.htm. 2007. [Cited: April 20, 2009.] http://www.txdot.gov/about_us/ 90. Texas State and County Quickfacts. U.S. Census Bureau website. commission/2007_meetings/transcripts/jul18_special.htm. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2009.] http://quickfacts. 102. Strategic Direction & Performance Measures: UDOT's final four, census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html. 2008. Utah Department of Transportation website. [Online] April 91. Texas Metropolitan Mobility Plan: Breaking the gridlock. Austin: 2009. [Cited: April 29, 2009.] http://www.dot.state.ut.us/main/ Texas Department of Transportation, Public Information Office, uconowner.gf?n=4309713963076909. 2003. 103. State and County Quick Facts. U.S. Census Bureau website. [On- 92. Texas--Transportation. City Data website. [Online] Advameg, Inc., line] April 2009. [Cited: April 29, 2009.] http://quickfacts.census. April 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2009.] http://www.city-data.com/ gov/qfd/states/49000.html. states/Texas-Transportation.html. 104. U.S. Census Bureau News, Utah is Fastest Growing State. U.S. 93. TxDOT Facts. Texas Department of Transportation website. [Online] Census Bureau website. [Online] December 2008. [Cited: April April 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2009.] http://www.dot.state.tx.us/ 29, 2009.] http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/ TPP/hwy/txdotfacts.htm. archives/population/013049.html. 94. 2010 Project Selection Process. Texas Department of Transportation 105. UDOT Mission, Objectives and Funding. Utah Department of website. [Online] November 2008. [Cited: April 17, 2009.] ftp:// Transportation website. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 29, 2009.] ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/fin/2010projectselection.pdf. http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pg:7603072591194658:::1: 95. Texas Transportation Priorities: Building on Success. Austin: Texas T,V:33. Department of Transportation, Government and Business Enter- 106. Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) by County by Ownership. Utah prise Division, 2006. Department of Transportation website. [Online] July 2008. [Cited: 96. Goals and Strategies. Texas Department of Transportation website. April 29, 2009.] http://www.udot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n= [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 17, 2009.] http://www.txdot.gov/ 2612690019773666066. about_us/goals_strategy.htm. 107. Streamlining Project Delivery: Project Delivery Handbook. Salt Lake 97. Interviews and panel discussion with Texas Department of Trans- City: Utah Department of Transportation, 2008. portation administration and management personnel. Austin, 108. UDOT Construction Manager General Contract (CMGC) Annual September 18, 2008. Report, 2007. Utah Department of Transportation website. [Online] 98. TxDOT Administration. Texas Department of Transportation 2007. [Cited: April 29, 2009.] http://www.dot.state.ut.us/main/ website. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 17, 2009.] http:// uconowner.gf?n=1135040022049311030. www.txdot.gov/about_us/administration/default.htm. 109. U.S. Department of Transportation. Tri-Met's Construction 99. Innovative Connectivity in Texas. Texas Department of Trans- Manager/General Contractor Approach. Federal Transit Adminis- portation website. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 13, 2009.] tration website. [Online] April 2009. [Cited: April 29, 2009.] http:// ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/library/reports/innovative_ www.fta.dot.gov/publications/reports/other_reports/publications_ connectivity.pdf. 1363.html.