National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 669: Models for Predicting Reflection Cracking of Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays (2010)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Zhou, Fujie, Lytton, Robert L, Hu, Sheng, Luo, Rong, Tsai, Fang-Ling, Lee, Sang Ick, Transportation Research Board. "System Identification Process." NCHRP Report 669: Models for Predicting Reflection Cracking of Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
28
bottomleft bottomright
Page
28
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Organization of the Report (1-1)
Material Properties (2-2)
Calibration to Field Data (3-3)
Use in Design (4-4)
Available Reflection Cracking Models (5-5)
Selection of a Reflection Cracking Model (6-6)
Process of Constructing a Calibrated Reflection Cracking Model (7-7)
Collection of Pavement Structure Data (8-9)
Traffic Data Collection (10-10)
Axle Load Distribution Factor (11-12)
Categorizing Traffic Load (13-13)
Finite Element Method for Calculating SIF (14-16)
Method of Predicting SIF (17-18)
Modeling of Cumulative Axle Load Distribution (19-19)
Probability Density on Tire Patch Length (20-25)
Reflection Cracking Amount and Severity Model (26-26)
Calibration of Field Reflection Cracking Model (27-27)
System Identification Process (28-28)
Parameter Adjustment and Adaption Algorithm (29-29)
Calibrating Reflection Cracking Model of Test Sections (30-32)
Heat Transfer in Pavement (33-33)
The Bottom Boundary Condition (34-34)
Stiffness, Tensile Strength, Compliance, and Fracture Properties of Mixtures (35-35)
Artificial Neural Network Algorithms for Witczak's Complex Modulus Models (36-37)
Models of Paris and Erdogan's Law Fracture Coefficients A and n (38-38)
Computational Method for Crack Growth Due to Traffic (39-40)
Computational Method for Viscoelastic Thermal Stresses (41-41)
Computation-to-Field Calibration Coefficients (42-43)
Validation of the Calibration Coefficients (44-47)
Mechanistic Prediction of Crack Growth (48-48)
Calibration of Calculated Overlay Life to the Observed Distress (49-49)
Predictions of Overlay Reflection Cracking (50-54)
Calibration of the Computational Model to Field Data (55-55)
Suggested Research (56-57)
References (58-59)
Appendices (60-60)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (61-61)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 28
28 % Reflective Crack Length Figure 23. Reflection cracking amount data from test sections in New York City. is minimized. The process used to achieve the calibration, when the error between observed and predicted crack lengths which determines and in the reflection cracking model, was minimized. Since the predicted crack length is calcu- was conducted using available field reflection cracking data lated by the calibrated model at each test section, a solution and an iterative method of the System Identification method was required to determine the parameters and process (details of the calibration process are presented in in the model. In this study, the system identification process Appendix L). was used. The purpose of the system identification process is to develop System Identification Process a mathematical model which describes the behavior of a sys- tem (real physical process). The actual system and the mathe- The reflection cracking amount and severity model at a matical model are identified when the error between them is given severity level was considered to have been calibrated minimized or satisfies the error criteria; otherwise, the model 100 90 80 % Reflective Crack Length 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Age, days Control GlassGrid Pavetrack Hatelit Petrogrid Pavedry Stargrid Add 1"HMA HotinPlace PFC w/ LevelUp PFC w/ SealCoat Figure 24. Low severity reflection cracking amount data in Amarillo, Texas.