National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Weiner, Richard, Koffman, David, Thatcher, Russell H, Procopio, Thomas, Ferris, Caroline, Davis, Mary, Morris, Clementine, Rodman, Will, Jacobson, Lisa, Golden, Marilyn, Transportation Research Board. "Workforce Status." TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
24
bottomleft bottomright
Page
24
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-4)
Study Issues, Goals, and Methodology (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-7)
An Overview of Paratransit Vehicle Operator Issues (8-8)
FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Reviews (9-9)
Demographic Factors Affecting Availability of Qualified Workers (10-10)
Impact of Management Characteristics and Practices (11-11)
Shortage of Vehicle Operators in Other Sectors: Fixed-Route Transit, School Bus, and Trucking (12-12)
Successful Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining Transit Vehicle Operators (13-13)
Workforce Planning: A Tool for Facilitating Vehicle Operator Availability (14-14)
Successful Approaches Cited in Other Transportation Sectors (15-17)
Attractiveness of the Operator Position (18-18)
How Providers Attract Applicants (19-19)
Factors Adversely Affecting Operator Satisfaction and Performance (20-20)
Implications of Findings (21-22)
Responses (23-23)
Workforce Status (24-24)
Pre-Qualification Requirements (25-25)
Training Completion Rates (26-26)
Annual Post-Training Turnover Rates (27-27)
Use of Split Shifts (28-29)
Pay Rates (30-30)
Impact of Wages on Turnover (31-31)
Union Representation and Impacts on Wages (32-32)
Types of Fringe Benefits Provided (33-33)
Level of Fringe Benefits Provided (34-34)
Relationship Between Paratransit and Fixed-Route Workforces (35-36)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment (37-38)
Efforts Made to Improve Recruitment (39-40)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Retention (41-41)
Efforts Made To Improve Retention (42-44)
Innovative Procurement Strategies (45-48)
Developing an Employee Profile and Pre-Qualifications (49-49)
Competitive Wages (50-50)
Recruitment Efforts (51-51)
Providing Effective Training and Tools (52-52)
Training (53-53)
Workable Schedules (54-54)
Management Support (55-55)
Underlying Causal Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment and Retention (56-56)
Compensation, Turnover, Productivity, and Total Cost (57-57)
Compensation and Recruitment and Training Costs (58-58)
Purpose of the Analysis and Data Sources (59-59)
Regression Analysis (60-60)
Starting Wage, Provider Type, and Turnover (61-61)
Health Care Coverage, Provider Type, and Turnover (62-62)
Summary of Findings (63-64)
Methodology (65-65)
Productivity Results - DART, Dallas, TX (66-67)
Productivity Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (68-68)
Methodology (69-69)
On-Time Performance Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (70-70)
Complaint Rate Results - DART, Dallas, TX (71-71)
Summary of Findings (72-73)
Methodology (74-74)
Charlotte Area Transit System Special Transportation Service (75-76)
MV Transportation, Denver, CO (77-77)
Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD (78-78)
Observations (79-79)
The Other Costs of Turnover (80-80)
Characteristics of Successful ADA Paratransit Operators (81-82)
Effective Recruiting Approaches (83-86)
Comprehensive Pre-Employment Screening (87-87)
Realistic Job Previews (88-89)
Compensation (90-91)
Training in Advanced Technologies (92-92)
Providing a Supportive Work Environment (93-95)
Best Practice: Early and Ongoing Input and Involvement (96-96)
Best Practice: Mentoring (97-98)
Chapter 9 - Benefits and Issues Related to Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (99-99)
Costs and Benefits of Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (100-102)
Varieties of Integration (103-103)
Instituting Full Workforce Integration and Wage Parity: Chelan-Douglas Public Transit Benefit Area (Link Transit), Wenatchee, WA (104-104)
Integration of an Alternative to Paratransit: The City of Annapolis Department of Transportation (Annapolis Transit), Annapolis, MD (105-105)
The Dynamics of Recently Instituting Wage Parity: Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT (106-107)
Approach and Methodology (108-108)
Lessons Learned (109-110)
Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Denver, CO (111-111)
Community Transit, Everett, WA (112-112)
Access Services, Inc. (ASI), Los Angeles, CA (113-114)
Madison Metro Transit, Madison, WI (115-115)
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA (116-116)
Palm Tran CONNECTION, Lake Worth, FL (117-117)
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department, Phoenix, AZ (118-118)
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego, CA (119-119)
San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), San Mateo, CA (120-121)
King County Metro Transit (Metro), Seattle/King County, WA (122-123)
Chapter 11 - Future Research Needs (124-125)
References (126-127)
Bibliography (128-128)
Appendixes (129-129)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (130-130)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 24
24 Table 3-1. Distribution of survey respondents. and 53 provided services in-house. Responses are shown in Figure 3-1. Number of ADA Paratransit Number of Respondents Vehicle Operators Overall, 20 of the 83 agencies (24%) indicated that vehicle 2-25 13 operator recruitment and retention had no impact on ser- 26-50 9 vices. Another 18 agencies (22%) indicated that vehicle oper- 51-75 13 76-100 10 ator recruitment had minimal impact. Twenty-five agencies 101-200 18 (30%) indicated a moderate impact, and 18 agencies (22%) 201+ 6 Total 69 indicated a significant impact. Responses varied significantly depending on whether ser- vices were operated in-house or contracted. Nineteen of the 20 entities that reported "No Impact" were transit agencies Perceived Impacts of Operator that operated services in-house. Eleven of the 18 that indi- Recruitment and Retention cated "Minimal Impact" were also in-house operations. On (Public Entities) the other hand, 15 of the 25 that reported "Moderate Impact" Public transit agencies were asked to indicate what impact were contracted operations, but 11 of the 18 that reported vehicle operator recruitment and retention had on ADA para- "Significant Impacts" were in-house operations. transit services in their area. They were asked to indicate if there had been no impact, minimal adverse impact, a moderate Workforce Status adverse impact, or a significant adverse impact. A "Not Sure" response option was also provided. A total of 83 responses In order to gauge the seriousness of the issue from providers to this question were received from public transit agencies. as well as administering agencies, a second question about As noted in the beginning of this section, responses were impacts was asked. All entities that operated service, both received from a total of 76 different public transit agencies. In public entities that provided service in-house as well as pri- a few cases, multiple responses to this question were received vate contractors, were asked to indicate the status of their from the same transit agency. Thirty of these contracted out paratransit vehicle operator workforces. They were asked to Public Transit Agencies (Contracted)-30 Responses 20 Public Transit Agencies (In-house Operations)-53 Responses 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 No Impact Minimal Adverse Moderate Adverse Significant Adverse Not Sure Impact Impact Impact Figure 3-1. Perceived impacts of vehicle operator recruitment and retention.