National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Weiner, Richard, Koffman, David, Thatcher, Russell H, Procopio, Thomas, Ferris, Caroline, Davis, Mary, Morris, Clementine, Rodman, Will, Jacobson, Lisa, Golden, Marilyn, Transportation Research Board. "Methodology." TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
74
bottomleft bottomright
Page
74
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-4)
Study Issues, Goals, and Methodology (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-7)
An Overview of Paratransit Vehicle Operator Issues (8-8)
FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Reviews (9-9)
Demographic Factors Affecting Availability of Qualified Workers (10-10)
Impact of Management Characteristics and Practices (11-11)
Shortage of Vehicle Operators in Other Sectors: Fixed-Route Transit, School Bus, and Trucking (12-12)
Successful Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining Transit Vehicle Operators (13-13)
Workforce Planning: A Tool for Facilitating Vehicle Operator Availability (14-14)
Successful Approaches Cited in Other Transportation Sectors (15-17)
Attractiveness of the Operator Position (18-18)
How Providers Attract Applicants (19-19)
Factors Adversely Affecting Operator Satisfaction and Performance (20-20)
Implications of Findings (21-22)
Responses (23-23)
Workforce Status (24-24)
Pre-Qualification Requirements (25-25)
Training Completion Rates (26-26)
Annual Post-Training Turnover Rates (27-27)
Use of Split Shifts (28-29)
Pay Rates (30-30)
Impact of Wages on Turnover (31-31)
Union Representation and Impacts on Wages (32-32)
Types of Fringe Benefits Provided (33-33)
Level of Fringe Benefits Provided (34-34)
Relationship Between Paratransit and Fixed-Route Workforces (35-36)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment (37-38)
Efforts Made to Improve Recruitment (39-40)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Retention (41-41)
Efforts Made To Improve Retention (42-44)
Innovative Procurement Strategies (45-48)
Developing an Employee Profile and Pre-Qualifications (49-49)
Competitive Wages (50-50)
Recruitment Efforts (51-51)
Providing Effective Training and Tools (52-52)
Training (53-53)
Workable Schedules (54-54)
Management Support (55-55)
Underlying Causal Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment and Retention (56-56)
Compensation, Turnover, Productivity, and Total Cost (57-57)
Compensation and Recruitment and Training Costs (58-58)
Purpose of the Analysis and Data Sources (59-59)
Regression Analysis (60-60)
Starting Wage, Provider Type, and Turnover (61-61)
Health Care Coverage, Provider Type, and Turnover (62-62)
Summary of Findings (63-64)
Methodology (65-65)
Productivity Results - DART, Dallas, TX (66-67)
Productivity Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (68-68)
Methodology (69-69)
On-Time Performance Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (70-70)
Complaint Rate Results - DART, Dallas, TX (71-71)
Summary of Findings (72-73)
Methodology (74-74)
Charlotte Area Transit System Special Transportation Service (75-76)
MV Transportation, Denver, CO (77-77)
Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD (78-78)
Observations (79-79)
The Other Costs of Turnover (80-80)
Characteristics of Successful ADA Paratransit Operators (81-82)
Effective Recruiting Approaches (83-86)
Comprehensive Pre-Employment Screening (87-87)
Realistic Job Previews (88-89)
Compensation (90-91)
Training in Advanced Technologies (92-92)
Providing a Supportive Work Environment (93-95)
Best Practice: Early and Ongoing Input and Involvement (96-96)
Best Practice: Mentoring (97-98)
Chapter 9 - Benefits and Issues Related to Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (99-99)
Costs and Benefits of Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (100-102)
Varieties of Integration (103-103)
Instituting Full Workforce Integration and Wage Parity: Chelan-Douglas Public Transit Benefit Area (Link Transit), Wenatchee, WA (104-104)
Integration of an Alternative to Paratransit: The City of Annapolis Department of Transportation (Annapolis Transit), Annapolis, MD (105-105)
The Dynamics of Recently Instituting Wage Parity: Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT (106-107)
Approach and Methodology (108-108)
Lessons Learned (109-110)
Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Denver, CO (111-111)
Community Transit, Everett, WA (112-112)
Access Services, Inc. (ASI), Los Angeles, CA (113-114)
Madison Metro Transit, Madison, WI (115-115)
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA (116-116)
Palm Tran CONNECTION, Lake Worth, FL (117-117)
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department, Phoenix, AZ (118-118)
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego, CA (119-119)
San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), San Mateo, CA (120-121)
King County Metro Transit (Metro), Seattle/King County, WA (122-123)
Chapter 11 - Future Research Needs (124-125)
References (126-127)
Bibliography (128-128)
Appendixes (129-129)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (130-130)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 74
74 CHAPTER 7 The Cost of Turnover As part of the study, research was conducted to document Methodology the full cost of vehicle operator recruitment and training. The cost of recruitment and training is one of the elements of the A spreadsheet tool was first developed to gather cost data model developed in Chapter 4 (see Figure 4-7). A more com- and operator applicant/trainee data. The spreadsheet was plete understanding of the cost of recruitment and training designed to capture both labor and other direct costs in four will allow managers of ADA paratransit operators to make general areas: (1) recruitment, (2) interviewing, (3) screen- ing, and (4) training. Examples of the types of costs incurred more informed workforce decisions--particularly the trade- in each area are presented in Table 7-1. offs between better compensation and recruitment and train- Contact persons were identified at each of the three systems. ing costs. The spreadsheet tool was sent to them and follow-up calls Documentation on the full cost of recruitment and training were made to review and answer questions about the spread- was developed by studying three selected ADA paratransit sheet and information needed. Once initial data were pro- operations. The three paratransit operations included in the vided, a second call was made to review and clarify the infor- research and analysis are the following: mation provided. Revisions were made as needed. Revised spreadsheets were then sent back to the system contacts for a · Charlotte Area Transit System's (CATS) Special Trans- final review and verification. In the case of CATS, a member portation Service (STS); of the research team also visited the STS staff in Charlotte to · The MV Transportation contract operation in Denver help gather data from the city. (under contract to the Denver RTD, Regional Transporta- For recruitment and advertising, data was gathered on any tion District); and staff time spent on job fairs, including preparation and/or atten- · The Veolia Transportation contract operation in Balti- dance and time spent on composing advertisements seeking more (under contract to MTA, the Maryland Transit vehicle operators. Direct costs in the recruitment and advertis- Administration). ing category included ad placement fees or other advertising costs, such as placing stickers on buses. Signing bonuses for new Thesethreeoperationswereselected forthefollowingreasons: operators and referral bonuses for current operators were also included in this cost category. · They reflected mid-sized to large paratransit operations: Data gathered for the applicant interviewing cost category CATS has a fleet size of 85 vehicles (72 peak pullout) and included staff time for application review, interview schedul- 84 vehicle operators; MV in Denver has a fleet size of 157 ing, and the time spent conducting the interviews themselves, vehicles and 196 operators; and Veolia in Baltimore has a both at the management and supervisory levels. fleet size of 160 vehicles and 213 operators. For screening, labor hours associated with processing the · They had variation in annual turnover rates: CATS at 14%, screening paperwork were included. Direct costs in this cat- Veolia at 52%, and MV at 57%. egory included DMV driving record check fees, criminal · They had variation in service design, with MV in Denver background checks, drug testing, and physicals. and Veolia in Baltimore representing private contracted The training category included labor costs for all staff operations, and CATS' STS representing an in-house, pub- members participating in training for new vehicle operators, lic operation. including primary classroom instructors, specialized training