National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Weiner, Richard, Koffman, David, Thatcher, Russell H, Procopio, Thomas, Ferris, Caroline, Davis, Mary, Morris, Clementine, Rodman, Will, Jacobson, Lisa, Golden, Marilyn, Transportation Research Board. "Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD." TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
78
bottomleft bottomright
Page
78
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-4)
Study Issues, Goals, and Methodology (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-7)
An Overview of Paratransit Vehicle Operator Issues (8-8)
FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Reviews (9-9)
Demographic Factors Affecting Availability of Qualified Workers (10-10)
Impact of Management Characteristics and Practices (11-11)
Shortage of Vehicle Operators in Other Sectors: Fixed-Route Transit, School Bus, and Trucking (12-12)
Successful Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining Transit Vehicle Operators (13-13)
Workforce Planning: A Tool for Facilitating Vehicle Operator Availability (14-14)
Successful Approaches Cited in Other Transportation Sectors (15-17)
Attractiveness of the Operator Position (18-18)
How Providers Attract Applicants (19-19)
Factors Adversely Affecting Operator Satisfaction and Performance (20-20)
Implications of Findings (21-22)
Responses (23-23)
Workforce Status (24-24)
Pre-Qualification Requirements (25-25)
Training Completion Rates (26-26)
Annual Post-Training Turnover Rates (27-27)
Use of Split Shifts (28-29)
Pay Rates (30-30)
Impact of Wages on Turnover (31-31)
Union Representation and Impacts on Wages (32-32)
Types of Fringe Benefits Provided (33-33)
Level of Fringe Benefits Provided (34-34)
Relationship Between Paratransit and Fixed-Route Workforces (35-36)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment (37-38)
Efforts Made to Improve Recruitment (39-40)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Retention (41-41)
Efforts Made To Improve Retention (42-44)
Innovative Procurement Strategies (45-48)
Developing an Employee Profile and Pre-Qualifications (49-49)
Competitive Wages (50-50)
Recruitment Efforts (51-51)
Providing Effective Training and Tools (52-52)
Training (53-53)
Workable Schedules (54-54)
Management Support (55-55)
Underlying Causal Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment and Retention (56-56)
Compensation, Turnover, Productivity, and Total Cost (57-57)
Compensation and Recruitment and Training Costs (58-58)
Purpose of the Analysis and Data Sources (59-59)
Regression Analysis (60-60)
Starting Wage, Provider Type, and Turnover (61-61)
Health Care Coverage, Provider Type, and Turnover (62-62)
Summary of Findings (63-64)
Methodology (65-65)
Productivity Results - DART, Dallas, TX (66-67)
Productivity Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (68-68)
Methodology (69-69)
On-Time Performance Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (70-70)
Complaint Rate Results - DART, Dallas, TX (71-71)
Summary of Findings (72-73)
Methodology (74-74)
Charlotte Area Transit System Special Transportation Service (75-76)
MV Transportation, Denver, CO (77-77)
Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD (78-78)
Observations (79-79)
The Other Costs of Turnover (80-80)
Characteristics of Successful ADA Paratransit Operators (81-82)
Effective Recruiting Approaches (83-86)
Comprehensive Pre-Employment Screening (87-87)
Realistic Job Previews (88-89)
Compensation (90-91)
Training in Advanced Technologies (92-92)
Providing a Supportive Work Environment (93-95)
Best Practice: Early and Ongoing Input and Involvement (96-96)
Best Practice: Mentoring (97-98)
Chapter 9 - Benefits and Issues Related to Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (99-99)
Costs and Benefits of Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (100-102)
Varieties of Integration (103-103)
Instituting Full Workforce Integration and Wage Parity: Chelan-Douglas Public Transit Benefit Area (Link Transit), Wenatchee, WA (104-104)
Integration of an Alternative to Paratransit: The City of Annapolis Department of Transportation (Annapolis Transit), Annapolis, MD (105-105)
The Dynamics of Recently Instituting Wage Parity: Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT (106-107)
Approach and Methodology (108-108)
Lessons Learned (109-110)
Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Denver, CO (111-111)
Community Transit, Everett, WA (112-112)
Access Services, Inc. (ASI), Los Angeles, CA (113-114)
Madison Metro Transit, Madison, WI (115-115)
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA (116-116)
Palm Tran CONNECTION, Lake Worth, FL (117-117)
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department, Phoenix, AZ (118-118)
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego, CA (119-119)
San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), San Mateo, CA (120-121)
King County Metro Transit (Metro), Seattle/King County, WA (122-123)
Chapter 11 - Future Research Needs (124-125)
References (126-127)
Bibliography (128-128)
Appendixes (129-129)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (130-130)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 78
78 Training pool was narrowed down to 208 applicants. Screening activ- ities, which involved a review of DMV records, criminal back- As a result of the screening process, the number of appli- ground checks, and drug testing results, resulted in a further cants who are selected to be trained was narrowed down from reduction of 6 applicants, leaving 202 for training. Of the 224 to 197, with 27 failing the screening checks or drug tests. trainees, 110 (54%) successfully completing the training, and MV has an operator trainer providing classroom training were hired as operators. 8 hours a day, every weekday of the year. At a wage rate of The calculated attrition rate for this operation is hence $23.29 per hour, this works out to an annual total of $48,443. 52% (110 new operators divided by 213 total operators). Twenty-four hours of behind-the-wheel (BTW) training is provided to each trainee, followed by an additional 38 hours of BTW training in revenue service (accompanied by a Recruitment and Advertising trainer). The hourly cost of the trainer for BTW is $12.25 per The only approach with any significant cost used by Veo- hour. In revenue service, the marginal cost is $1.00 per hour. lia to recruit in Baltimore is recruitment bonuses. Veolia gives Together, the BTW training costs a total of $65,404 for the a $250 referral bonus to any staff member who brings Veolia 197 applicants. And most significantly, training wages were applicants who are eventually hired. In this past year, 10 refer- derived by multiplying the 102 hours of total training at $9.00 ral bonuses were awarded, totaling $2,500 for the year. The per hour for each trainee. This comes to a total of $180,846 cost per applicant recruited works out to $1.39, based on the for the year for all 197 applicants. 1,800 applicants. The recruitment cost per operator hired The sum of the annual training costs thus total $294,693. works out to $23. The cost per applicant trained works out to $1,497. The train- ing cost per operator hired is $2,655. Applicant Interviews Total Costs Veolia reported that the total cost of reviewing applications and interviewing applicants was $105,000. Based on this total MV in Denver spent $7,042 on recruiting, $16,250 on annual cost, the cost per applicant interviewed works out to interviewing, $24,573 on screening, and $304,171 on initial $253. The interviewing cost per operator hired is $955. training for a grand total of $352,036 per year. With 111 oper- ator "graduates" hired from this process, this total figure equates to $3,181 per operator hired. Applicant Screening Following the interviews, approximately half of the appli- Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD cants were dropped from the process, leaving 208 applicants for whom screening is conducted. Screening consists of review- Introduction ing the DMV record brought to the interview by the applicant Veolia Transportation is the largest contractor in Balti- and then conducting criminal background checks and a drug more for the MTA's ADA Paratransit program, called Mobil- testing for each applicant. The criminal background checks ity. For this program, Veolia operates 160 revenue vehicles cost $30.50 each. The drug testing costs $130 each. Together, with 213 full- and part-time vehicle operators. these expenses total $160.50 per applicant, which when mul- Veolia operators receive an $8.00 per hour training wage, tiplied by the 208 applicants yields an annual total direct cost and a $10.25 starting wage. Operators are also eligible for an of $33,384. Staff labor to process the checks and drug test extra $1.25 per hour that is paid each pay period if they have results was not reported. The reported cost per applicant perfect attendance (no unscheduled call-outs or tardiness) screened works out to $161. The screening cost per operator during the period. Fringe benefits include 1 week of paid vaca- is $303. tion to start and health care coverage (with a 25% employee contribution for individual or family coverage). Teams of Training operators are also eligible to earn performance bonuses that can be up to $375 per operator every 3 months (described in As a result of the screening process, the number of appli- more detail in Chapter 8). Veolia also offers unlimited $250 cants who are selected to be trained is winnowed down from referral bonuses, paid after the new hire completes 90 days on 208 to 202, a reduction of only 6 applicants. the job. Veolia reported annual training costs at $129,000. An addi- During this past year, Veolia received 1,800 operator appli- tional $193,920 in operator trainee wages was based on cations as a result of its recruitment efforts. Of these, 415 (23%) 24,240 hours multiplied by a wage rate of $8.00. No additional were interviewed. As a result of the interviews, the applicant direct expenses were reported.