National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations (2010)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Weiner, Richard, Koffman, David, Thatcher, Russell H, Procopio, Thomas, Ferris, Caroline, Davis, Mary, Morris, Clementine, Rodman, Will, Jacobson, Lisa, Golden, Marilyn, Transportation Research Board. "Observations." TCRP Report 142: Vehicle Operator Recruitment, Retention, and Performance in ADA Complementary Paratransit Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
79
bottomleft bottomright
Page
79
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-4)
Study Issues, Goals, and Methodology (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-7)
An Overview of Paratransit Vehicle Operator Issues (8-8)
FTA ADA Paratransit Compliance Reviews (9-9)
Demographic Factors Affecting Availability of Qualified Workers (10-10)
Impact of Management Characteristics and Practices (11-11)
Shortage of Vehicle Operators in Other Sectors: Fixed-Route Transit, School Bus, and Trucking (12-12)
Successful Approaches to Recruiting and Retaining Transit Vehicle Operators (13-13)
Workforce Planning: A Tool for Facilitating Vehicle Operator Availability (14-14)
Successful Approaches Cited in Other Transportation Sectors (15-17)
Attractiveness of the Operator Position (18-18)
How Providers Attract Applicants (19-19)
Factors Adversely Affecting Operator Satisfaction and Performance (20-20)
Implications of Findings (21-22)
Responses (23-23)
Workforce Status (24-24)
Pre-Qualification Requirements (25-25)
Training Completion Rates (26-26)
Annual Post-Training Turnover Rates (27-27)
Use of Split Shifts (28-29)
Pay Rates (30-30)
Impact of Wages on Turnover (31-31)
Union Representation and Impacts on Wages (32-32)
Types of Fringe Benefits Provided (33-33)
Level of Fringe Benefits Provided (34-34)
Relationship Between Paratransit and Fixed-Route Workforces (35-36)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment (37-38)
Efforts Made to Improve Recruitment (39-40)
Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Retention (41-41)
Efforts Made To Improve Retention (42-44)
Innovative Procurement Strategies (45-48)
Developing an Employee Profile and Pre-Qualifications (49-49)
Competitive Wages (50-50)
Recruitment Efforts (51-51)
Providing Effective Training and Tools (52-52)
Training (53-53)
Workable Schedules (54-54)
Management Support (55-55)
Underlying Causal Factors That Impact Vehicle Operator Recruitment and Retention (56-56)
Compensation, Turnover, Productivity, and Total Cost (57-57)
Compensation and Recruitment and Training Costs (58-58)
Purpose of the Analysis and Data Sources (59-59)
Regression Analysis (60-60)
Starting Wage, Provider Type, and Turnover (61-61)
Health Care Coverage, Provider Type, and Turnover (62-62)
Summary of Findings (63-64)
Methodology (65-65)
Productivity Results - DART, Dallas, TX (66-67)
Productivity Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (68-68)
Methodology (69-69)
On-Time Performance Results - LYNX, Orlando, FL (70-70)
Complaint Rate Results - DART, Dallas, TX (71-71)
Summary of Findings (72-73)
Methodology (74-74)
Charlotte Area Transit System Special Transportation Service (75-76)
MV Transportation, Denver, CO (77-77)
Veolia Transportation, Baltimore, MD (78-78)
Observations (79-79)
The Other Costs of Turnover (80-80)
Characteristics of Successful ADA Paratransit Operators (81-82)
Effective Recruiting Approaches (83-86)
Comprehensive Pre-Employment Screening (87-87)
Realistic Job Previews (88-89)
Compensation (90-91)
Training in Advanced Technologies (92-92)
Providing a Supportive Work Environment (93-95)
Best Practice: Early and Ongoing Input and Involvement (96-96)
Best Practice: Mentoring (97-98)
Chapter 9 - Benefits and Issues Related to Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (99-99)
Costs and Benefits of Workforce Integration and Wage Parity (100-102)
Varieties of Integration (103-103)
Instituting Full Workforce Integration and Wage Parity: Chelan-Douglas Public Transit Benefit Area (Link Transit), Wenatchee, WA (104-104)
Integration of an Alternative to Paratransit: The City of Annapolis Department of Transportation (Annapolis Transit), Annapolis, MD (105-105)
The Dynamics of Recently Instituting Wage Parity: Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT (106-107)
Approach and Methodology (108-108)
Lessons Learned (109-110)
Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD), Denver, CO (111-111)
Community Transit, Everett, WA (112-112)
Access Services, Inc. (ASI), Los Angeles, CA (113-114)
Madison Metro Transit, Madison, WI (115-115)
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA (116-116)
Palm Tran CONNECTION, Lake Worth, FL (117-117)
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department, Phoenix, AZ (118-118)
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego, CA (119-119)
San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), San Mateo, CA (120-121)
King County Metro Transit (Metro), Seattle/King County, WA (122-123)
Chapter 11 - Future Research Needs (124-125)
References (126-127)
Bibliography (128-128)
Appendixes (129-129)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (130-130)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 79
79 Together, these two costs total $322,920 for the year. The small. It appears that, because CATS has a comparatively high cost per applicant trained works out to $1,599. The training wage scale--$14.41 per hour plus comprehensive benefits, cost per operator hired is $2,936. CATS does not have to invest in recruitment/advertising, compared to the two contractors who spend between $2,500 Total Costs and $7,042 per year in recruitment costs. When the number of eventual hires is compared to the Over the course of last year, Veolia in Baltimore spent number of applicants recruited, there is a narrow range among $2,500 on recruiting, $105,000 on processing applications the three systems: between 5% and 7%. This becomes a useful and interviewing, $33,384 on screening, and $322,920 on ini- number for budgeting. If managers of ADA paratransit systems tial training for a grand total of $463,804 per year. With 110 know the historic attrition rate, they can estimate how many operator "graduates" hired from this process, this total figure applicants they will need to attract by dividing the number of equates to $4,216 per operator hired. As indicate above, this operators needed by between 0.05 and 0.07. does not include any costs associated with operator trainer There is a relatively narrow range of screening costs per wages, training materials, or management/administrative time operator hired, ranging from $222 per operator hired in Den- to arrange and review screening results. ver to $396 per operator hired in Charlotte. There is a relative narrow range of initial training costs per Summary of Findings operator hired, ranging from $2,583 in Charlotte to $2,936 Tables 7-2 and 7-3 provide a summary of the information per operator hired in Baltimore. Interestingly, if one looks at collected and costs estimated for each system studied. Table training costs per trainee, a comparison between the two con- 7-2 shows the number of applicants recruited, interviewed, tractors in Baltimore and Denver shows that these unit costs screened, trained, and ultimately hired (placed in service). are almost equivalent--$1,541 in Denver versus $1,599 in Table 7-3 shows the estimated costs of recruiting, interview- Baltimore. ing, screening, and training, as well as the total cost for each The biggest difference appears to be in interviewing costs system. Table 7-2 also shows the unit costs per applicant and per operator hired, ranging from a low of $147 per operator per operator hired. hired in Denver to a high of $955 per operator hired in Balti- more. Note that Veolia's total cost of reviewing the 1,800 applications and interviewing the 415 operator candidates in Observations Baltimore at $105,000 is significantly higher than the $16,250 The low number of applicants that CATS needs to recruit spent by MV in reviewing roughly 1,500 applications and to fill the 12 job openings it had in the study year is strikingly interviewing 308 operators. Table 7-2. Numbers of applicants recruited, interviewed, screened, trained, and hired. Applicants Applicants Applicants Applicants Operators Recruited Interviewed Screened Trained Hired CATS/Charlotte 250 25 20 12 12 MV/Denver 1,496 308 224 197 111 Veolia/Baltimore 1,800 415 208 202 110 Table 7-3. Total and unit costs of recruiting, interviewing, screening and training applicants. Recruiting Interviewing Screening Training Total CATA/Charlotte Total Costs $0 $5,400 $4,747 $30,990 $41,137 Per applicant $0 $216 $237 $2,583 NA Per Operator Hired $0 $450 $396 $2,583 $3,428 MV/Denver Total Costs $7,042 $16,250 $24,573 $304,171 $352,036 Per applicant $4.71 $53 $110 $1,541 NA Per Operator Hired $64 $147 $222 $2,749 $3,181 Veolia/Baltimore Total Costs $2,500 $105,000 $33,384 $322,920 $463,804 Per applicant $1.39 $253 $161 $1,599 NA Per Operator Hired $23 $955 $303 $2,936 $4,216