Measuring Transportation Network Performance (2010)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

75 Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Soci- etal Problems. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Adams, L. H., Harrison, F. D., and Vandervalk, A. (2005). Issues and Challenges in Using Existing Data and Tools for Performance Mea- surement. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22–24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36), pp. 131–140. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ conf/CP36.pdf. AASHTO. (1977). Manual on User Benefit Analysis of Highway and Bus- Transit Improvements. Washington, D.C. AASHTO. (2007). State DOT Performance Measurement Programs: Select Examples. Available at http://knowledge.fhwa.dot.gov. Accessed July 25, 2008. Batty, D. (2001). NCHRP Report 450: Transportation Research Thesaurus and User’s Guide. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Bracaglia, F. (2005). NCHRP Web Document 79: Monitoring, Analyzing, and Reporting on the Environmental Streamlining Pilot Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Bremmer, D., Cotton, K. C., and Hamilton, B. (2005). Emerging Perfor- mance Measurement Responses to Changing Political Pressures at State Departments of Transportation: Practitioners’ Perspective. Transporta- tion Research Board, Washington, D.C. Brydia, R. E., Schneider IV, W. H., Mattingly, S. P., Sattler, M. L., and Upayokin, A. (2007). Operations-Oriented Performance Measures for Freeway Management Systems: Year 1 Report (No. FHWA/TX-07/ 0-5292-1). Texas Transportation Institute; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas; Federal Highway Administration. Cambridge Systematics. (1999). Multimodal Transportation: Develop- ment of a Performance-Based Planning Process. National Cooper- ative Highway Research Program Project 8-32(2). Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2000). NCHRP Report 446: A Guidebook for Performance-Based Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2001). NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 07: Devel- opment of a Multimodal Tradeoffs Methodology for Use in Statewide Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2002). NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 11: Techni- cal Methods to Support Analysis of Environmental-Justice Issues. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2004). Transportation Impacts of Smart Growth and Comprehensive Planning Initiatives. Prepared for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and Fed- eral Highway Administration through National Cooperative High- way Research Program Project 25-25(02). Cambridge Systematics. (2005). NCHRP 7-15, Task 1.3: Cost-Effective Measures and Planning Procedures for Travel Time, Delay, and Relia- bility. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2007). NCHRP Research Results Digest 312: Guide to Effective Freeway Performance Measurement. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics. (2009). SHRP 2 Report S2-C02-RR: Performance Measurement Framework for Highway Capacity Decision-making. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrell, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y. H., Arrington, G. B., et al. (2004). TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Edwards, M. R., Peer, R. L., Lindner, E., and Klein, T. H. (2005). NCHRP Report 542: Evaluating Cultural Resource Significance: Implementa- tion Tools. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. FHWA. (2003). Economic Analysis Primer. Office of Asset Manage- ment, FHWA-IF-03-032. Washington, D.C. FHWA. (2008). Statewide Opportunities for Linking Planning and Opera- tions: A Primer. Washington, D.C. Forkenbrock, D. J., and Weisbrod, G. E. (2001). NCHRP Report 456: Guidebook for Assessing the Social and Economic Effects of Transporta- tion Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.; University of Iowa, Iowa City. Halfawy, M. R. (2008). Integration of Municipal Infrastructure Asset Management Processes: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Com- puting in Civil Engineering, 22(3), pp. 216–229. Harrison, R., Schofield, M., Loftus-Otway, L., Middleton, D., and West, J. (2006). Developing Freight Highway Corridor Performance Measure Strategies in Texas (No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5410-1). Texas University, Austin; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas; Federal Highway Administration. Hendren and Meyers. (2006). NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 53 (02): Peer Exchange Series on State and Metropolitan Transportation Planning Issues. Meeting 2: Nontraditional Performance Measures. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C. ICF Consulting. (2005). Handbook on Integrating Land Use Consider- ations into Transportation Projects to Address Induced Growth (No. NCHRP 25-25/Task 03). Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. A P P E N D I X C References

Poister, T., and D. Van Slyke. (2001). Managing Change in State Depart- ments of Transportation. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report SP20-24. Transportation Research Board, Wash- ington, D.C. Pratt and Lomax. (1996). Performance Measures for Multimodal Trans- portation Systems. Randall, J. E. (2007). NCHRP 03-81: Strategies for Integrated Operation of Freeway and Arterial Corridors. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Rose, D. C., Gluck, J., Williams, K., and Kramer, J. (2005). NCHRP Report 548: A Guidebook for Including Access Management in Trans- portation Planning. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Shaw, T. (2003). Performance Measures of Operational Effectiveness for Highway Segments and Systems. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 311. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. TransTech Management, Inc. (2004). NCHRP Web Document 69: Per- formance Measures for Context-Sensitive Solutions—A Guidebook for State DOTs. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C. Accessed July 15, 2008. Available at http://trb. org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_w69.pdf. TRB. (2005). Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems: Summary of the Second National Conference. August 22–24, 2004, Irvine, California, Conference Proceedings 36. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. TRB. (2007). Information Assets to Support Transportation Decision- Making: Report of a Peer Exchange of State Transportation Organi- zations. April 17–18, 2007, Kansas City, Kansas. Transportation Research Circular E-C121. Transportation Research Board, Wash- ington, D.C. Venner, M. (2005). NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 10: Early Mitigation for Net Environmental Benefit: Meaningful Off-Setting Measures for Unavoidable Impacts. Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C. Ward, B. G. (2005). Measuring the Effectiveness of Community Impact Assessment: Recommended Core Measures (No. FDOT BC353-28). University of South Florida, Tampa; Florida Department of Trans- portation, Tallahassee; Federal Highway Administration. 76 Kittelson & Associates, Urbitran, Inc., LKC Consulting Services, Inc., Morpace International, Inc., Queensland University of Technology, and Nakanishi, Y. (2003). A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System. Transit Cooperative Research Pro- gram Report 88. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Larson, M. C. (2005). Organizing for Performance Management. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22–24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36) pp. 99–120. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP36.pdf. Lewis, D. (1991). NCHRP Report 342: Primer on Transportation, Produc- tivity, and Economic Development. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. The Louis Berger Group, Inc. (2002). NCHRP Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effects of Proposed Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Meyer, M. D. (1995). Alternative Performance Measures for Transporta- tion Planning: Evolution Toward Multimodal Planning. Georgia Insti- tute of Technology, prepared for the U.S. DOT, Report Number FTA-GA-26-7000. Meyer, M. (2001). Measuring That Which Cannot Be Measured—At Least According to Conventional Wisdom. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 29–November 1, 2000. Performance Mea- sures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations, pp. 105–125. Available at http://www.trb.org/publications/conf/ reports/cp_26.pdf. Pickrell, S., and Neumann, L. (2001). Use of Performance Measures in Transportation Decision-Making. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, October 29-November 1, 2000. Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations: Sum- mary of the Second National Conference, pp. 17–33. Available at http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/conf/reports/cp_26.pdf. Poister, T. H. (1997). NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 238: Perfor- mance Measurement in State Departments of Transportation. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Poister, T. H. (2005). Performance Measurement in Transportation: State of the Practice. Report of a Conference, Irvine, California, August 22–24, 2004. Second National Conference on Performance Measures (36), pp. 81–98. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/conf/CP36.pdf.