National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints (2010)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "1.1 Problem Statement." NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
5
bottomleft bottomright
Page
5
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
1.1 Problem Statement (5-5)
1.3.2 Data Collection (6-7)
1.3.3 Data Analysis (8-8)
2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost Highway Improvements (9-9)
2.2.4 Low-Cost Operational/Technology Improvements (10-10)
2.2.5 Examples of Low-Cost Operational Improvements (11-11)
2.2.6 Low-Cost Regulatory/Public Policy Improvements (12-12)
2.3.1 Freight Capacity (13-13)
2.3.3 Low-Cost Improvements (14-14)
2.4.3 Performance Indicators (15-15)
2.4.6 Examples of Low-Cost Improvements (16-17)
3.3 System Performance (18-20)
3.4 Highways (21-24)
3.5 Railroads (25-28)
3.6 Intermodal (29-29)
3.7 Deepwater Ports (30-34)
3.8.3 Inland Rivers and Waterways (35-35)
3.8.4 Locks and Dams (36-39)
4.1 Defining and Characterizing Freight Mobility Constraints (40-40)
4.2.1 Highways (41-41)
4.2.2 Railroads (42-42)
4.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (43-43)
4.2.4 Labor Unions (44-44)
4.2.5 Summary (45-46)
4.3.1 Highways (47-48)
4.3.4 Summary (49-52)
5.1.1 Highways (53-53)
5.1.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (54-54)
5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost Improvements (55-55)
5.4.1 Highways Improvement Strategies (56-60)
5.4.2 Railroads Improvement Strategies (61-61)
5.4.3 Deepwater and Inland Waterways Improvement Strategies (62-63)
5.5 Summary of Improvements (64-67)
6.2.1 Characterization of Constraint (68-68)
6.2.2 Selection of Improvements (69-70)
6.2.3 Evaluation of Improvement Options (71-71)
6.5 Integration into Planning Process (72-72)
6.5.1 Transportation Planning Process (73-73)
6.5.2 Project Development Process (74-74)
6.6 Evaluation of Beta Version of Tool (75-75)
7.2 Approach to Developing Catalog of Strategies (76-76)
7.2.1 Highways (77-77)
7.2.2 Railroads (78-81)
7.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (82-86)
8.1 Conclusions (87-87)
8.2 Recommendations for Further Research (88-89)
References (90-92)
Acronyms (93-94)
Appendix A - Methodology User Guide (95-99)
Appendix B - Annotated Bibliography (100-109)
Appendix C - Interview Guide (110-113)
Appendix D - Internet Survey Instrument (114-125)
Appendix E - Low-Cost Improvement Analysis Tool (LCIAT) Evaluation Form (126-126)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (127-127)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 5
5 CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Research Approach 1.1 Problem Statement mobility. These factors have significantly increased interest in addressing freight mobility constraints through imple- Freight transportation has been and continues to be a major mentation of innovative operational strategies, performance- contributor to the U.S. economy. Estimates indicate that the improving regulatory and policy changes, and low-cost capital volumes of freight are expected to double over the next two improvements. decades in the United States. A report (1) noted that the nation's Recent studies and statistics document the inadequate capac- freight ton-miles by all freight modes increased steadily at ity and increasingly costly congestion--not only on the nation's an average rate of 1.2 percent per year between 1980 and 2004. highways but also in metropolitan areas, at water ports, rail- The rapid growth in freight demand over the last 15 years roads, airports, and intermodal facilities. For example, the has produced growing concerns regarding the capacity of the trucking industry faces increasing levels of congestion each freight transportation system to support and sustain safe and year, including that resulting from poorly managed interac- efficient freight mobility. The increasing freight demand and tions between truck and automobile traffic on Interstate high- capacity constraints present several challenges to the manage- ways and local arterials, including traffic associated with inter- ment and operation of the freight transportation system. The modal terminals. As previously stated, the U.S. transportation U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) estimates that network is operating at an unprecedented high level of traffic volumes of goods shipped by trucks and railroads will increase density. For example, the density of traffic on the highway over 2002 levels by 88 percent and 98 percent, respectively, by system has more than doubled over the past 25 years with 2035 (2). During this time the ability to increase freight trans- consequences that include increased congestion, delay, and portation capacity will be constrained by budgetary limita- air emissions. Over the same period, railroad network traffic tions, geographic barriers, population density, and urban land- density has nearly tripled (4). There is no single or simple solu- use development patterns. The consequences of this increased tion for the mobility challenges. The approach should focus freight demand and increased density include increased con- on the entire surface and maritime transportation system rather gestion, delay, air emissions, and operational costs, among than mode-specific solutions. A system-wide approach to trans- others. Furthermore, evolving technologies, growing demand, portation planning and funding would yield desirable results. changing business practices, shifting patterns of commerce, Severe congestion increases the costs and frequency of needed and government policies designed to address safety, security, road maintenance, which in turn takes a toll on throughput environmental, and other public concerns may significantly and vehicle operating costs and productivity during the high- affect transportation system performance. way maintenance season. Freight mobility is constrained not only by physical infra- Many innovative, low-cost improvements are being imple- structure inadequacies but also by operational, regulatory, mented independently by public and private stakeholders [e.g., policy, technological, and financial limitations. Federal, state, state DOTs, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and local transportation agencies' ability to invest in system shippers, freight carriers, port authorities, terminal operators, expansion and new system technology has been significantly railroads, and other groups of stakeholders] to address freight constrained by inadequate revenue. The recent National Sur- mobility problems to meet their specific needs. Although many face Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission promising strategies have been developed and implemented, (3) noted that the nation is investing only about 40 percent of they have not been well documented or evaluated for their pos- the necessary levels to adequately sustain passenger and freight sible applicability or scalability to other regions or localities.