National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints (2010)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost Improvements." NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
55
bottomleft bottomright
Page
55
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
1.1 Problem Statement (5-5)
1.3.2 Data Collection (6-7)
1.3.3 Data Analysis (8-8)
2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost Highway Improvements (9-9)
2.2.4 Low-Cost Operational/Technology Improvements (10-10)
2.2.5 Examples of Low-Cost Operational Improvements (11-11)
2.2.6 Low-Cost Regulatory/Public Policy Improvements (12-12)
2.3.1 Freight Capacity (13-13)
2.3.3 Low-Cost Improvements (14-14)
2.4.3 Performance Indicators (15-15)
2.4.6 Examples of Low-Cost Improvements (16-17)
3.3 System Performance (18-20)
3.4 Highways (21-24)
3.5 Railroads (25-28)
3.6 Intermodal (29-29)
3.7 Deepwater Ports (30-34)
3.8.3 Inland Rivers and Waterways (35-35)
3.8.4 Locks and Dams (36-39)
4.1 Defining and Characterizing Freight Mobility Constraints (40-40)
4.2.1 Highways (41-41)
4.2.2 Railroads (42-42)
4.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (43-43)
4.2.4 Labor Unions (44-44)
4.2.5 Summary (45-46)
4.3.1 Highways (47-48)
4.3.4 Summary (49-52)
5.1.1 Highways (53-53)
5.1.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (54-54)
5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost Improvements (55-55)
5.4.1 Highways Improvement Strategies (56-60)
5.4.2 Railroads Improvement Strategies (61-61)
5.4.3 Deepwater and Inland Waterways Improvement Strategies (62-63)
5.5 Summary of Improvements (64-67)
6.2.1 Characterization of Constraint (68-68)
6.2.2 Selection of Improvements (69-70)
6.2.3 Evaluation of Improvement Options (71-71)
6.5 Integration into Planning Process (72-72)
6.5.1 Transportation Planning Process (73-73)
6.5.2 Project Development Process (74-74)
6.6 Evaluation of Beta Version of Tool (75-75)
7.2 Approach to Developing Catalog of Strategies (76-76)
7.2.1 Highways (77-77)
7.2.2 Railroads (78-81)
7.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (82-86)
8.1 Conclusions (87-87)
8.2 Recommendations for Further Research (88-89)
References (90-92)
Acronyms (93-94)
Appendix A - Methodology User Guide (95-99)
Appendix B - Annotated Bibliography (100-109)
Appendix C - Interview Guide (110-113)
Appendix D - Internet Survey Instrument (114-125)
Appendix E - Low-Cost Improvement Analysis Tool (LCIAT) Evaluation Form (126-126)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (127-127)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 55
55 60 < 6 mos >= 6 mos but < 1 yr >= 1 yr but < 2 yrs 50 >= 2 yrs Percent of Respondents 40 30 20 10 0 Highways Railroads Deepwater Ports Figure 18. Definition of "quickly implementable." (see Figure 18). The following section presents generic defini- and that can be implemented within a short period without tions of quickly implementable low-cost improvements. extended disruption to traffic flow. Such an improvement may be physical, operational, or regulatory, as long as it enables greater throughput from existing facilities. These actions may 5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost be spot (or location-specific) improvements or may be lim- Improvements ited to short sections of the physical infrastructure. Likewise, Based on discussions presented above, the following para- they may be specific to a given supply chain process point, graph presents generic criteria for low-cost, quickly imple- regulation, or mode; they may also be multimodal. Further- mentable improvements and is followed by mode-specific more, low-cost improvements do not involve massive recon- definitions. Table 24 summarizes key characteristics of these struction of infrastructure that usually takes many years to improvements. complete. A "low-cost and quickly implementable" improvement to Highways: A low-cost and quickly implementable improve- address freight mobility constraints may be defined as an ment does not require special programming, time-consuming action that modifies existing geometry and operational fea- environmental clearances, or right-of-way acquisition and are tures of the freight transportation infrastructure system within budget limitations enabling implementation at a district Table 24. Key features of low-cost and quickly implementable improvements. Quickly Mode Characteristics of Low-Cost Actions Implementable · Less than $1 million · Spot or location-specific improvements · No environmental clearances necessary Highways · No right-of-way acquisition Less than 1 year · No special programming required · Implementation at district lowest operation unit level (limited direct HQ oversight) · Class I railroad ­ $1 million to $10 million Less than 2 years Railroads · Regional railroad ­ less than $2 million Less than 1 year · Short-line railroad ­ less than $500,000 Less than 6 months · Less than $1million Deepwater · Physical improvements may involve highway and rail projects Ports & within and outside the port terminals at links serving ports ­ location-specific actions Less than 2 years Inland Waterways · Mainly operational actions including technology deployments · Uniqueness of each port acknowledged