National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints (2010)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "8.1 Conclusions." NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
87
bottomleft bottomright
Page
87
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
1.1 Problem Statement (5-5)
1.3.2 Data Collection (6-7)
1.3.3 Data Analysis (8-8)
2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost Highway Improvements (9-9)
2.2.4 Low-Cost Operational/Technology Improvements (10-10)
2.2.5 Examples of Low-Cost Operational Improvements (11-11)
2.2.6 Low-Cost Regulatory/Public Policy Improvements (12-12)
2.3.1 Freight Capacity (13-13)
2.3.3 Low-Cost Improvements (14-14)
2.4.3 Performance Indicators (15-15)
2.4.6 Examples of Low-Cost Improvements (16-17)
3.3 System Performance (18-20)
3.4 Highways (21-24)
3.5 Railroads (25-28)
3.6 Intermodal (29-29)
3.7 Deepwater Ports (30-34)
3.8.3 Inland Rivers and Waterways (35-35)
3.8.4 Locks and Dams (36-39)
4.1 Defining and Characterizing Freight Mobility Constraints (40-40)
4.2.1 Highways (41-41)
4.2.2 Railroads (42-42)
4.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (43-43)
4.2.4 Labor Unions (44-44)
4.2.5 Summary (45-46)
4.3.1 Highways (47-48)
4.3.4 Summary (49-52)
5.1.1 Highways (53-53)
5.1.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (54-54)
5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost Improvements (55-55)
5.4.1 Highways Improvement Strategies (56-60)
5.4.2 Railroads Improvement Strategies (61-61)
5.4.3 Deepwater and Inland Waterways Improvement Strategies (62-63)
5.5 Summary of Improvements (64-67)
6.2.1 Characterization of Constraint (68-68)
6.2.2 Selection of Improvements (69-70)
6.2.3 Evaluation of Improvement Options (71-71)
6.5 Integration into Planning Process (72-72)
6.5.1 Transportation Planning Process (73-73)
6.5.2 Project Development Process (74-74)
6.6 Evaluation of Beta Version of Tool (75-75)
7.2 Approach to Developing Catalog of Strategies (76-76)
7.2.1 Highways (77-77)
7.2.2 Railroads (78-81)
7.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (82-86)
8.1 Conclusions (87-87)
8.2 Recommendations for Further Research (88-89)
References (90-92)
Acronyms (93-94)
Appendix A - Methodology User Guide (95-99)
Appendix B - Annotated Bibliography (100-109)
Appendix C - Interview Guide (110-113)
Appendix D - Internet Survey Instrument (114-125)
Appendix E - Low-Cost Improvement Analysis Tool (LCIAT) Evaluation Form (126-126)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (127-127)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 87
87 CHAPTER 8 Conclusions and Suggested Research 8.1 Conclusions · Operational Constraints--practices, processes, events, or occurrences that constrain optimal throughput, and efficient This project developed standardized descriptions of the operating conditions. Examples include poor signal phasing, dimensions of the freight transportation system, defined freight port gate processes, technological limitations, outdated sig- mobility constraints in a multimodal context, developed crite- naling systems, and inadequate traveler information. ria for low-cost and quickly implementable improvements to · Regulatory Constraints--Federal, state, or local regulatory address freight mobility constraints, and developed a software requirements that, while intended to provide an environ- application tool to help decision makers in evaluating freight ment for safe and secure operation, have unintended con- mobility constraints and selecting appropriate improvements. sequences that restrict the flow of freight through the sys- The tool is backed by a database of improvement projects for tem. Examples include safety and security requirements, highway, rail, and deepwater ports and implemented by differ- truck restrictions, zoning policies, air quality restrictions, ent agencies. and labor contractual limitations. Freight mobility is constrained not only by physical infra- structure inadequacies but also by operational, regulatory, The predominant type of freight mobility constraint (phys- policy, technological, and financial limitations. The capac- ical, operational, or regulatory) depends on the primary mode ity of the existing freight transportation system can be increased of freight movement. Regulatory restrictions (in particular through innovative operational strategies, performance- Federal, state, and local land use and environmental laws and improving regulatory and policy changes, and low-cost cap- regulations) and operational limitations (including techno- ital improvements. logical limitations/inadequacies) are the most common types of mobility constraints affecting all modes. Definition of Freight Mobility Constraint A freight mobility constraint can be defined as "a physical Criteria for Low-Cost and Quickly or infrastructure deficiency, regulatory requirement (Federal, Implementable Improvement state, or local), or operational action that impedes or restricts Although many innovative, low-cost efforts are being imple- the free flow of freight either at the network level or at a spe- mented by public and private agencies, there are no unique cific location." Mobility constraints increase costs, contribute criteria to define what constitutes a low-cost improvement to system inefficiencies, and delay on-time freight delivery. directed to enhance freight mobility. A "low-cost and quickly The three main types of constraints are: implementable" improvement to address freight mobility con- straints may be defined as: · Physical Constraints--any geometric or infrastructure con- ditions that constrain freight operators from operating at an action that modifies existing geometry and operational designed, safe speeds and within legally required parameters. features of the freight transportation infrastructure system and that can be implemented within a short period without extended Examples include inadequate capacity of the transportation disruption to traffic flow. Such an improvement may be physical, system to meet traffic demand (e.g., mainlines, interchanges, operational, or regulatory, as long as it enables greater through- rail sidings, port terminals) and geometric restrictions or put from existing facilities. These actions may be spot (or location- limitations affecting safe and efficient mobility. specific) improvements or may be limited to short sections of the