National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints (2010)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost Highway Improvements." NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
9
bottomleft bottomright
Page
9
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
1.1 Problem Statement (5-5)
1.3.2 Data Collection (6-7)
1.3.3 Data Analysis (8-8)
2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost Highway Improvements (9-9)
2.2.4 Low-Cost Operational/Technology Improvements (10-10)
2.2.5 Examples of Low-Cost Operational Improvements (11-11)
2.2.6 Low-Cost Regulatory/Public Policy Improvements (12-12)
2.3.1 Freight Capacity (13-13)
2.3.3 Low-Cost Improvements (14-14)
2.4.3 Performance Indicators (15-15)
2.4.6 Examples of Low-Cost Improvements (16-17)
3.3 System Performance (18-20)
3.4 Highways (21-24)
3.5 Railroads (25-28)
3.6 Intermodal (29-29)
3.7 Deepwater Ports (30-34)
3.8.3 Inland Rivers and Waterways (35-35)
3.8.4 Locks and Dams (36-39)
4.1 Defining and Characterizing Freight Mobility Constraints (40-40)
4.2.1 Highways (41-41)
4.2.2 Railroads (42-42)
4.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (43-43)
4.2.4 Labor Unions (44-44)
4.2.5 Summary (45-46)
4.3.1 Highways (47-48)
4.3.4 Summary (49-52)
5.1.1 Highways (53-53)
5.1.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (54-54)
5.2 Criteria for Low-Cost Improvements (55-55)
5.4.1 Highways Improvement Strategies (56-60)
5.4.2 Railroads Improvement Strategies (61-61)
5.4.3 Deepwater and Inland Waterways Improvement Strategies (62-63)
5.5 Summary of Improvements (64-67)
6.2.1 Characterization of Constraint (68-68)
6.2.2 Selection of Improvements (69-70)
6.2.3 Evaluation of Improvement Options (71-71)
6.5 Integration into Planning Process (72-72)
6.5.1 Transportation Planning Process (73-73)
6.5.2 Project Development Process (74-74)
6.6 Evaluation of Beta Version of Tool (75-75)
7.2 Approach to Developing Catalog of Strategies (76-76)
7.2.1 Highways (77-77)
7.2.2 Railroads (78-81)
7.2.3 Deepwater Ports and Inland Waterways (82-86)
8.1 Conclusions (87-87)
8.2 Recommendations for Further Research (88-89)
References (90-92)
Acronyms (93-94)
Appendix A - Methodology User Guide (95-99)
Appendix B - Annotated Bibliography (100-109)
Appendix C - Interview Guide (110-113)
Appendix D - Internet Survey Instrument (114-125)
Appendix E - Low-Cost Improvement Analysis Tool (LCIAT) Evaluation Form (126-126)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (127-127)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 9
9 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 2.1 Introduction In addition, non-recurring events are also known to con- tribute to delay. The most common of these events are listed This chapter documents previous research and practices below along with the percentage share of each event type (7): regarding freight mobility issues. For each of the three prin- cipal surface transportation modes of freight movement, the · Non-fatal crashes (45.5 percent) literature review attempts to capture definitions of mobility · Work zones (24.3 percent) constraints, definitions of low-cost improvements, and strate- · Breakdowns (12.0 percent) gies to address mobility constraints. Finally, the literature · Weather (9.0 percent). review documents examples of low-cost improvements imple- mented to improve freight mobility. An annotated bibliogra- Freight mobility constraints can be caused by physical, oper- phy is also provided in Appendix B. ational, or regulatory factors. Recent National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 3-83, "Low- 2.2 Highways/Trucking Cost Improvements for Recurring Freeway Bottlenecks," iden- tified the following as some of the physical or geometric features 2.2.1 Defining the Freight Mobility Problem that contribute to the occurrence of freeway bottlenecks (8): on Highways and Roadways · On-ramp sections with no auxiliary lane additions or with A number of factors contribute to constrained freight mobil- short deceleration lanes ity, which, when combined, have significant adverse economic, · Weaving sections, particularly out of dropped lanes environmental, safety, and security impacts. One factor is the · Lane drops on basic segments, or following off-ramps or growing demand for freight transportation, as reflected by the tunnel sections, where free flow speed may be reduced increasing volume of domestic and international freight that is · Horizontal curves, where vehicle paths may cross into the moved on the nation's transportation system. next lane According to USDOT estimates, the volume of goods moved · Long upgrades, particularly in the presence of heavy vehicles by truck and rail is projected to increase 98 percent and 88 per- · Narrow lanes on older freeways cent, respectively, from 2002 levels by 2035. As a result of · Lateral obstructions, which reduce free flow speeds. increasing freight demand, congestion is rising and is expected to increase in the future. This congestion will have a number of negative impacts. For example, producers, shippers, and 2.2.2 Definition of Low-Cost consumers will suffer the higher economic costs of an ineffi- Highway Improvements cient freight transportation system (5). While certain improvements may be considered as low- FHWA (6) categorized freight mobility problems related to cost, there is no general definition of the characteristics of such bottlenecks in the following four constraint types: activities. The Minnesota DOT (9) used the following four cri- teria to identify "short-term, low-cost congestion-reduction · Interchange constraints strategies" for specific bottleneck locations: · Highway capacity constraints · Geometry constraints (i.e., steep grade) 1. Projects were required to have the potential of a 50 percent · Intersection-related constraints. reduction in congestion