National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 8 - Conclusions and Suggested Research
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14439.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14439.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14439.
×
Page 92

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

90 1. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Freight in America: A New National Picture. Research and Innovative Technology Administra- tion. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2006. 2. Government Accountability Office. Transportation Programs: Chal- lenges Facing the DOT and Congress. GAO-09-435T. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., March 2009. 3. FHWA. Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission: Transportation for Tomorrow. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2007. 4. Weatherford, B.A., H.H. Willis, and D.S. Oritz. The State of U.S. Railroads. A Review of Capacity and Performance Data. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2008. 5. Government Accountability Office. Freight Transportation: National Policy and Strategies Can Help Improve Freight Mobility, GAO-08- 287, Government Accountability Office Washington, D.C., Jan. 2008. 6. FHWA. An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2005. 7. Chin, S.M., O. Franzese, D.L. Greene, H.L. Hwang, and R.C. Gibson. Temporary Losses of Highway Capacity and Impacts of Performance: Phase 2. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Nov. 2004. 8. Rouphail, N., K. Petty, B. Eads, and J. McDermott. “Low-Cost Improvements for Recurring Freeway Bottlenecks.” Interim Report, NCHRP Project 3-83. Dowling Associates, Oakland, CA, Dec. 2006. 9. Meyer, M. Combating Congestion through Leadership, Innovation and Resources. A Summary Report. National Congestion Summit, Sep. 2007. 10. Latham, F.E. and J. Trombly. Low Cost Traffic Engineering Improve- ments: A Primer. Report No. FHWA-OP-03-078. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., April 2003. 11. Walters, C., S. Cooner, and S. Ranft. Reconsidering Freeway Bottle- necks: Case Studies of Bottleneck Removal Projects in Texas. Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, TX, Dec. 2006. 12. FHWA. Traffic Bottlenecks: A Primer – Focus on Low-Cost Operational Improvements. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., 2007. 13. Shafran, I. and A. Strauss-Weider. NCHRP Report 497: Financing and Improving Land Access to U.S. Intermodal Cargo Hubs. Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 14. FHWA. Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Linking Solutions to Prob- lems. Executive Summary. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 2004. 15. Cambridge Systematics Inc. Twin Cities Ramp Meter Evaluation: Executive Summary. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN, Feb. 2001. 16. Dunn, W. and S. Latoski. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 318: Safe and Quick Clearance of Traffic Incidents. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 17. FHWA. Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies for Congestion Mitigation. Executive Summary. U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Sep. 2005. 18. 511 Deployment Coalition. 511 America’s Traveler Information Number: Deployment Assistance Report #1: Business Models and Cost Considerations. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2002. 19. Lee, E., K. Choi, and S. Lim. Streamlined Strategies for Faster, Less Traffic-Disruptive Highway Rehabilitation in Urban Networks. Pre- sented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008. 20. Government Accountability Office. Surface Transportation: Strategies Are Available for Making Existing Road Infrastructure Perform Better, GAO-07-920, Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., July 2007. 21. Short, J. Survey of Motor Carrier Opinions on Potential Optional Truck Only Toll Lanes on Atlanta Interstate Highways. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2007. 22. Clarke, R.M. Motor Vehicle Size and Weight Considerations. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000. 23. O’Laughlin, R., D. Thomas, and R.M. Rinnan. Chicago Downtown Freight Study. Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., Nov. 2007. 24. The Tioga Group. Goods Movement Truck and Rail Study Executive Summary. Project 99-130. Prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, CA, Jan. 2003. 25. Association of American Railroads. Railroad Facts. AAR, Office of Information and Public Affairs, Washington, D.C., 2006. 26. Cambridge Systematics Inc. National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study. Prepared for American Association of Railroads, Washington, D.C., Sep. 2007. 27. Immel, E. and B. Burgel. Rail Capacity in the I-5 Corridor. Presented for the AASHTO Standing Committee on Rail Transportation, San Diego, CA, Oct. 2004. 28. Maritime Administration. Report to Congress on the Performance of Ports and the Intermodal System. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., June 2005. References

91 29. Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency (CREATE) Program. www.createprogram.org/ Accessed Sep. 23, 2008. 30. North Carolina Department of Transportation Rail Division. www.bytrain.org/track/rghgro.html Accessed June 15, 2008. 31. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. National Dredging Needs Study of U.S. Ports and Harbors: Update 2000. Report 00-R-04. Institute of Water Resources, USACE, Alexandria, VA, 2003. 32. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Maritime Trade and Transpor- tation 1999. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999. 33. Special Report 279: The Marine Transportation System and the Federal Role: Measuring Performance, Targeting Improvement. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2004. 34. Knatz, G. National Port Planning: A Different Perspective. In Trans- portation Research Record 1963. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2006, pp. 52–55. 35. Government Accountability Office. Surface and Marine Transpor- tation: Developing Strategies for Enhancing Mobility: A National Challenge. GAO-02-775. Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., August, 2002. 36. Le-Griffin, H.D. and M. Murphy. Container Terminal Productivity: Experiences at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Proc. National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, CA. Feb. 2006. www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Le-Murphy.pdf Accessed Oct. 3, 2009. 37. Wang, T-F., D-W. Song, and K.P.B. Cullinane. The Applicability of Data Envelopment Analysis to Efficiency Measurement of Con- tainer Ports. Proc. International Association of Maritime Economists, Panama Conference, Nov. 2002. p. 6. 38. PierPass. www.pierpass.org/ Accessed July 25, 2008. 39. Roche Ltée, Groupe-Conseil and Levelton Consultants Ltd. Terminal Appointment System Study. Prepared for Transportation Develop- ment Centre, Transport Canada. Ottawa, March 2006. www.tc.gc.ca/ innovation/tdc/summary/14500/14570e.htm. Assessed Dec. 3, 2009. 40. U.S. Department of Commerce. Trade Stats Express. International Trade Administration. www.ita.doc.gov/ Accessed June 12, 2007. 41. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Pocket Guide to Transportation 2008. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 2008. 42. Battelle. FAF Capacity Analysis: Scenario Analysis Results Report. Project report submitted to Office of Freight Management and Operations. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2002. 43. FHWA. Measuring Improvements in the Movement of Highway and Intermodal Freight. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washing- ton, D.C. 2000. 44. FHWA. NHS Intermodal Freight Connectors: A Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2000. 45. AASHTO. Freight-Rail Bottom Line Report. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2003. 46. Maritime Administration. America’s Marine Highways Map. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. www.marad.dot. gov/ships_shipping_landing_page/mhi_home/mhp_map/mhp_ map.htm Accessed March 23, 2010. 47. FRA, Office of Policy and Communications. Freight Railroads Back- ground. www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/policy/freight2006%20final. pdf Accessed April 30, 2008. 48. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Port and Waterway Facilities. Navi- gation Data Center. USACE, Washington, D.C., 2004. 49. American Trucking Associations. American Trucking Trends: 2005. American Trucking Associations, Arlington, VA, 2006. 50. Maritime Administration. U.S. Water Transportation Statistical Snapshot. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2008. 51. FHWA. Tonnage on Highways, Railroads, and Inland Waterways: 2002 Map. Office of Freight Management and Operations: U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation. Washington, D.C. www.ops.fhwa.dot. gov/freight/freight_analysis/nat_freight_stats/tonhwyrrww2002. htm Accessed Aug. 2008. 52. FHWA. FAF2 Provisional Annual Commodity Origin-Destination Data and Documentation. Office of Freight Management and Operations. U.S. Department of Transportation. www.ops.fhwa. dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf2_pro.htm Accessed Aug. 2008. 53. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Sta- tistics, 2008. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. www.bts.gov/publications/ national_transportation_statistics/ Accessed June 2008. 54. Short, J. and C. Jones. Utilization of Wireless Truck Position Data to Determine Demand for Highways. Proc. 10th International Conference on the Application of Advanced Technologies in Trans- portation. Athens, Greece, 2008. 55. Project description for NCFRP-03, “Freight Performance Mea- sures.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 56. FHWA. Freight Facts and Figures 2008. Office of Freight Manage- ment and Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washing- ton, D.C., 2008. 57. American Trucking Associations. American Trucking Trends: 2006. American Trucking Associations. Arlington, VA, 2007. 58. Battelle. FAF2 Traffic Analysis. Final report prepared for FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations. U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C., 2007. 59. Global Insight Inc. The U.S. Truck Driver Shortage: Analysis and Forecasts. Prepared for American Trucking Associations, Alexandria, VA, May 2005. 60. AAR. U.S. Freight Railroad Productivity, Briefing Paper. Association of American Railroads, Feb. 2008. www.aar.org/ViewContent. asp?Content_ID=285 Accessed on April 17, 2008. 61. ICF International. Comparative Evaluation of Rail and Truck Fuel Efficiency on Competitive Corridors. Final Report prepared for Federal Railroad Administration. Washington, D.C., Nov. 2009. 62. Association of American Railroads. Railroad Facts Book. Association of American Railroads, Office of Information and Public Affairs, Washington, D.C., 1964–2007. 63. Association of American Railroads. 2007 Railroad Facts Book. Asso- ciation of American Railroads, Office of Information and Public Affairs, Washington, D.C., 2008. 64. Congressional Budget Office. Freight Rail Transportation: Long-Term Issues. The U.S. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2006. 65. Stover, J.F. American Railroads, 2nd ed. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1997, p. 194. 66. Dennis, S.M. Changes in Railroad Rates Since The Staggers Act. Transportation Research Part E 37, 2000, pp. 55–69. 67. Spychalski, J.C. and P.F. Swan. U.S. Rail Freight Performance Under Downsized Regulation. Utility Policy, Vol. 12 Issue 3, 2004, pp. 165–179. 68. Boyer, K.D. Why Do Freight Transportation Demand Curves Slope Down? Proc. Allied Social Sciences Association, New Orleans, LA, 2001. 69. Czerniak, R., S. Gaiser, and D. Gerard. The Use of Intermodal Performance Measures by State Departments of Transportation.

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., 1994. 70. Hinkelman, E.G. Dictionary of International Trade, 6th ed. Novato, CA, 2005. 71. American Association of Port Authorities. www.aapa-ports.org/ Industry/content.cfm?ItemNumber=1022&navItemNumber=901, Accessed Sep 19, 2008. 72. Maritime Administration. National Port Gateway and Freight Cor- ridor Strategy. Draft Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 2008. 73. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The US Waterway System Trans- portation Facts. Navigation Data Center, USACE, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2007. 74. Maritime Administration. Industry Survey Series: Mainstream Con- tainer Services. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003. 75. Georgia Ports Authority. AnchorAge, Volume 47, No. 1, 2007. 76. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Employment Statistics Survey, Detailed Data Files. www.bls.gov. Accessed Sep 2009. 77. Inland Rivers Ports and Terminals Association. www.irpt.net Accessed Sep 19, 2008. 78. American Waterway Operators. Factsheet www.americanwaterways. com/industry_stats/facts_about_ind/factsabout.pdf Accessed Sep 19, 2008. 79. ASCE. Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. www.asce.org/ reportcard/2005/page.cfm?id=36 Accessed Sep 19, 2008. 80. Center for Ports and Waterways. A Modal Comparison of Domestic Freight Transportation Effects on the General Public. Texas Trans- portation Institute, Houston, TX, 2007. 81. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Part 3 – Waterways Harbors Great Lakes. Navigation Data Center, USACE, Washington, D.C., 2006. 82. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Inland Marine Transportation System Improvement Report. USACE, Washington, D.C., Sep. 2008. 83. Florida Department of Transportation. Florida’s Strategic Inter- modal System. www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/sis/ Accessed July 2008. 84. Utah Department of Transportation. System Planning and Pro- gramming. http://udot.utah.gov/main/f?p=100:pg:0::::V,T:,53. Accessed July 2008. 85. Cambridge Systematics Inc. Ohio Freight Mobility, Access, and Safety Strategies. Project report prepared for Ohio Department of Trans- portation, Columbus, OH, May 2006. 86. I-95 Corridor Coalition. www.i95coalition.org/i95/Default.aspx Accessed July 2008. 87. California Environmental Protection Agency. “Goods Movement in California.” Jan 2005. www.arb.ca.gov/gmp/docs/policy.pdf Accessed Oct. 2009. 88. American Trucking Associations. Freight Performance Measures Analysis of 30 Freight Bottlenecks. American Trucking Associations, Arlington, VA, March 2009. 89. FHWA. Estimated Cost of Freight Involved in Highway Bottleneck. Final report. Office of Transportation Policy Studies. U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation. Washington, D.C., Nov. 2008. 90. Cambridge Systematics Inc. Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study. Technical Memorandum prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission, Dec 2006. 91. AASHTO. America’s Freight Challenge. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., May 2007. 92. Global Insight Inc. Houston Region Freight Transportation Profile. Technical Memorandum: Freight and Goods Movement. Prepared for Houston-Galveston Area Council. June 2009. 93. Martinez, R.E. NS and Public-Private Partnerships: The Heartland Corridor and The Crescent Corridor. October 2007. http://trans portation.northwestern.edu/docs/0000/Martinez_presentation.pdf. Accessed August 2009. 94. I-95 Corridor Coalition. Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study. Sum- mary Report. I-95 Corridor Coalition, April 2002. 95. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Tonnage for Selected U.S. Ports in 2008. USACE, Navigation Data Center. www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ ndc/wcsc/portton08.htm Accessed March 2010. 96. FHWA. Freight Facts and Figures. Office of Freight Management and Operations: U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/nat_freight_stats/ docs/08factsfigures/figure3_15.htm Accessed Nov. 2009. 97. Port of New York/New Jersey. www.panynj.gov/press-room/press- item.cfm?headLine_id=1223 Accessed Sep. 2009. 98. The Hampton Roads Chassis Pool. www.hrcp2.org/Home/tabid/ 37/Default.aspx Accessed Sep. 2009. 99. Port of Tacoma. www.portoftacoma.com/e-port Accessed Sep. 2009. 92

Next: Acronyms »
Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP) Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints explores standardized descriptions of the dimensions of the freight transportation system, identifies freight mobility constraints in a multimodal context, highlights criteria for low-cost and quickly implementable improvements to address the constraints, and includes a software tool to help decision makers in evaluating constraints and selecting appropriate improvements.

The software tool is available for download in a .zip format. A user guide for the software is also available for download.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!