National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 6: Impacts of Public Policy on the Freight Transportation System (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "The Role of Government." NCFRP Report 6: Impacts of Public Policy on the Freight Transportation System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
16
bottomleft bottomright
Page
16
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-7)
Methodology (8-8)
Report Organization (9-9)
The Freight Transportation Modes (10-15)
The Role of Government (16-17)
Security Policy (18-18)
Environmental Policy (19-19)
Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance Policy (20-20)
Infrastructure Finance Policy (21-21)
Trade Policy and Economic Regulation (22-23)
HOS Rules for Truck Drivers (24-25)
HOS Rules for Train Operators (26-26)
Truck Speed Limits and Speed Governor Rules (27-27)
Aircraft Fuel Tank Flammability Rules (28-28)
Restrictions on Locomotive Horns (29-29)
TWIC for Ports and Inland Towboats (30-31)
Federal Emission Standards for Diesel Engines (32-32)
California In-Use Truck Emission Standards (33-33)
Idling Restrictions for Trucks and Locomotives (34-34)
Restrictions on Port Drayage Trucks (35-35)
Restrictions on Disposal of Port Dredging Spoil (36-36)
Water Pollutant Discharge Rules for Vessels (37-37)
International Air Emissions Regulations for Vessels (38-38)
State Truck Route Restrictions (39-39)
Local Policies to Oppose a Railroad Acquisition (40-40)
Truck Size and Weight Rules (41-42)
Level of Investment in Highway Infrastructure (43-43)
Level of Investment in Inland Waterway Infrastructure (44-44)
Highway Tolls and Other User Charges (45-45)
Peak Pricing for Port Trucks (46-46)
Peak Pricing for Airports (47-48)
Case Study 1: Local Land Use Policies Affecting Port Facilities and Other Freight Terminals (49-53)
Case Study 2: Local Truck Access and Parking Policies (54-57)
Case Study 3: Air Cargo Screening Requirements (58-62)
Case Study 4: State and Federal Climate Change Policies (63-71)
Decisionmaker Constituencies (72-72)
Decision Context Framework (73-73)
Summary Discussion (74-75)
Conclusions (76-78)
Appendix A - Interviewees and Focus Group Participants (79-80)
Appendix B - Details on Impacts of Selected Policies (81-95)
Appendix C - Resources (96-101)
Appendix D - Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms (102-104)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (105-105)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 16
16 Source: National Highway Institute Course 139001, "Integrating Freight in the Transportation Planning Process." Figure 2-8. U.S. pipeline network. The Role of Government Administration (FMCSA), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Federal Railroad Administra- Government at all levels has a role in building, operating, tion (FRA), the Coast Guard, the Maritime Administration maintaining, and regulating the freight system, although (MARAD), and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety the specific government roles vary considerably across the Administration (PHMSA). The Environmental Protection modes. Agency (EPA) establishes many environmental rules that affect At the Federal level, the two major government roles in freight carriers. The Transportation Security Administration freight are (1) funding and related cost-recovery policies and (TSA) makes security-related rules. The U.S. Congress may (2) regulation, especially safety and environmental regula- enact regulatory laws in any of these areas. tion. For highways, the Federal government sets overall levels The Surface Transportation Board (STB) is unique in the of Federal aid and, through the earmarking process, takes a extent of its role as a Federal economic regulator. Railroads hand in project selection. Congress must also provide the have monopoly power in some of their markets. STB must financing for highway investment through fuel taxes, other decide rate cases in such markets and make rules regarding user charges, or various credit devices. The Federal govern- these issues. ment has a similar role in providing funding for airport The state role in freight system funding is similar to the Fed- infrastructure. (In this regard, both the FHWA and FAA set eral role. State legislatures set highway funding levels and play standards for highway and runway design.) FAA directly a role in project selection; they are also involved in setting fuel funds and operates the air traffic control system. The U.S. taxes and other user charges to finance the system. States may Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is responsible for main- invest in ports and airports as well. State authorities have taining and improving the inland waterway system, including responsibility to enforce some safety regulations, such as sup- building locks and dredging navigation channels. Railroads porting FMCSA rules and weight limits. State legislatures set and pipelines are in a separate category in terms of funding; speed limits, subject to Federal constraints. States can impose with limited exceptions, they bear the full financial responsi- some environmental regulations, such as requirements for bility for their infrastructure. impact analysis and mitigation for transportation projects. In terms of safety regulation, numerous Federal agencies California is unique among states in its authority to set motor are involved, including FAA, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety vehicle emission standards.

OCR for page 17
17 Local government roles tend to be similar for all modes, operations. Many seaports and airports are owned and man- mostly relating to land use planning and local rules to mini- aged by a public port authority, sometimes created by a local mize the adverse effects of freight facilities, such as noise, government and sometimes created by a state. traffic, and lighting. Decisions in these areas primarily affect Table 2-1 shows the principal Federal and state agencies with trucking and rail, but they can also affect barge and aviation direct policy responsibilities for the freight system. Table 2-1. Summary of major government roles in freight systems. Funding Agencies Regulating Agencies Mode Federal State Federal State Air Congress Legislatures FAA N/A FAA (traffic control, DOTs (airports) EPA airports) TSA PHMSA Truck Congress Legislatures FMCSA (operations) Legislatures FHWA DOTs NHTSA (vehicles) DOT EPA Law enforcement TSA DMV PHMSA Rail minimal minimal STB (economic) Environmental agencies FRA EPA TSA PHMSA Water Congress Legislatures Coast Guard Legislatures Corps of Engineers MARAD Environmental agencies Fed. Maritime Commission TSA PHMSA Pipeline minimal minimal PHMSA Environmental agencies FERC (economic) Offices of pipeline safety