National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 6: Impacts of Public Policy on the Freight Transportation System (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Security Policy." NCFRP Report 6: Impacts of Public Policy on the Freight Transportation System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
18
bottomleft bottomright
Page
18
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-7)
Methodology (8-8)
Report Organization (9-9)
The Freight Transportation Modes (10-15)
The Role of Government (16-17)
Security Policy (18-18)
Environmental Policy (19-19)
Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance Policy (20-20)
Infrastructure Finance Policy (21-21)
Trade Policy and Economic Regulation (22-23)
HOS Rules for Truck Drivers (24-25)
HOS Rules for Train Operators (26-26)
Truck Speed Limits and Speed Governor Rules (27-27)
Aircraft Fuel Tank Flammability Rules (28-28)
Restrictions on Locomotive Horns (29-29)
TWIC for Ports and Inland Towboats (30-31)
Federal Emission Standards for Diesel Engines (32-32)
California In-Use Truck Emission Standards (33-33)
Idling Restrictions for Trucks and Locomotives (34-34)
Restrictions on Port Drayage Trucks (35-35)
Restrictions on Disposal of Port Dredging Spoil (36-36)
Water Pollutant Discharge Rules for Vessels (37-37)
International Air Emissions Regulations for Vessels (38-38)
State Truck Route Restrictions (39-39)
Local Policies to Oppose a Railroad Acquisition (40-40)
Truck Size and Weight Rules (41-42)
Level of Investment in Highway Infrastructure (43-43)
Level of Investment in Inland Waterway Infrastructure (44-44)
Highway Tolls and Other User Charges (45-45)
Peak Pricing for Port Trucks (46-46)
Peak Pricing for Airports (47-48)
Case Study 1: Local Land Use Policies Affecting Port Facilities and Other Freight Terminals (49-53)
Case Study 2: Local Truck Access and Parking Policies (54-57)
Case Study 3: Air Cargo Screening Requirements (58-62)
Case Study 4: State and Federal Climate Change Policies (63-71)
Decisionmaker Constituencies (72-72)
Decision Context Framework (73-73)
Summary Discussion (74-75)
Conclusions (76-78)
Appendix A - Interviewees and Focus Group Participants (79-80)
Appendix B - Details on Impacts of Selected Policies (81-95)
Appendix C - Resources (96-101)
Appendix D - Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms (102-104)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (105-105)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
18 CHAPTER 3 What Public Policies Can Affect the Freight Transportation System? Chapter 2 introduced the role of government at the Federal, The primary safety functions of the Federal Railroad Admin- state, and local level in funding, operating, and regulating the istration (FRA) are inspection procedures and standards for freight transportation system. Many government policies were equipment (cars and locomotives), track, and signals. These developed with the intent to directly affect freight carriers include standards to be met for different track speeds. In the or shippers. Although the magnitude of freight system effects past, Congress legislated some safety rules, such as requiring may be different than expected, and the policies may have that brakes be in operating condition, but most of these (except other unintended spillover effects, the primary cause-effect HOS) are now managed by FRA. Standards for materials and relationship for these policies is usually clear. Other govern- the design of equipment, track, and signals are set by an indus- ment policies affect the freight system more indirectly, in that try body for equipment (the Association of American Railroads the intent of the policy was not to cause a freight system effect. [AAR]) and by a professional association of engineers for track An example of such an indirect impact is the growth in rail- and signals (the American Railway Engineering and Mainte- road transport of Power River Basin coal resulting from the nance Association [AREMA]). HOS rules for train crews are, Clean Air Act. for the most part, set by Congress. In this section, the research team illustrates the many gov- Hazardous materials transport is the focus of much Federal ernment policies that have had or could have freight system policy debate, including the safety of hazmat transportation in effects. The research team has organized this review around general, liability costs to carriers, safety and security risks, and the following nine policy categories: community concerns over hazmat passing through localities. FAA sets safety policy for aircraft that can affect the air cargo · Safety industry. Coast Guard safety rules affect barge operations. · Security The states make decisions regarding highway speed lim- · Land Use its (albeit they are constrained by Federal laws) and play an im- · Environmental portant role enforcing size-and-weight rules for trucks, FMCSA · Energy and Climate Change rules regarding truck operations, speed limits, and other reg- · Infrastructure Operations and Maintenance ulations. State and local governments have recently been in- · Infrastructure Investment volved in policy decisions affecting the use of locomotive horns · Infrastructure Finance at grade crossings and funding for grade-crossing improve- · Trade and Economic Regulation ments using Federal grants. Local governments may establish truck parking policies or other access restrictions in the name of improving pedestrian or vehicle safety. Table 3-1 lists exam- Safety Policy ples of safety policies that may affect the freight system. Safety is a broad area with significant policy-making roles for both the Federal government and states. Much of the reg- Security Policy ulatory decision making is at the Federal level. FMCSA, for example, sets safety rules for trucking, including the hours- Following the events of 9/11, the Federal government has of-service (HOS) rules for drivers and rules for electronic proposed and implemented new rules and regulations related on-board recorders. The National Highway Transportation to transportation security, some of which affect freight. Many Safety Administration (NHTSA) sets vehicle-design standards. of these policies focus on screening workers and restricting